Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Ramaswami, S

Minimal forcing sets for 1D origami

Authors: Mirela Damian, Erik Demaine, Muriel Dulieu, Robin Flatland, Hella Hoffman, Thomas C. Hull, Jayson Lynch, Suneeta Ramaswami

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of finding minimum forcing sets in origami. The origami material folds flat along straight lines called creases that can be labeled as mountains or valleys. A forcing set is a subset of creases that force all the other creases to fold according to their labels. The result is a flat folding of the origami material. In this paper we develop a linear time algorithm th… ▽ More This paper addresses the problem of finding minimum forcing sets in origami. The origami material folds flat along straight lines called creases that can be labeled as mountains or valleys. A forcing set is a subset of creases that force all the other creases to fold according to their labels. The result is a flat folding of the origami material. In this paper we develop a linear time algorithm that finds minimum forcing sets in one dimensional origami. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 21 pages with a 6-page appendix

MSC Class: 05B99 ACM Class: F.2.2

A fast algorithm for computing irreducible triangulations of closed surfaces in $E^d$

Authors: Suneeta Ramaswami, Marcelo Siqueira

Abstract: We give a fast algorithm for computing an irreducible triangulation $T^\prime$ of an oriented, connected, boundaryless, and compact surface $S$ in $E^d$ from any given triangulation $T$ of $S$. If the genus $g$ of $S$ is positive, then our algorithm takes $O(g^2+gn)$ time to obtain $T^\prime$, where $n$ is the number of triangles of $T$. Otherwise, $T^\prime$ is obtained in linear time in $n$. Whi… ▽ More We give a fast algorithm for computing an irreducible triangulation $T^\prime$ of an oriented, connected, boundaryless, and compact surface $S$ in $E^d$ from any given triangulation $T$ of $S$. If the genus $g$ of $S$ is positive, then our algorithm takes $O(g^2+gn)$ time to obtain $T^\prime$, where $n$ is the number of triangles of $T$. Otherwise, $T^\prime$ is obtained in linear time in $n$. While the latter upper bound is optimal, the former upper bound improves upon the currently best known upper bound by a $(\lg n / g)$ factor. In both cases, the memory space required by our algorithm is in $Θ(n)$. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2014; v1 submitted 21 September, 2014; originally announced September 2014.

Comments: 52 pages, a shorter version of this Technical Report is about to be submitted to Elsevier Journal Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications

MSC Class: 05C10; 68U05

Flipturning polygons

Authors: Oswin Aichholzer, Carmen Cortes, Erik D. Demaine, Vida Dujmovic, Jeff Erickson, Henk Meijer, Mark Overmars, Belen Palop, Suneeta Ramaswami, Godfried T. Toussaint

Abstract: A flipturn is an operation that transforms a nonconvex simple polygon into another simple polygon, by rotating a concavity 180 degrees around the midpoint of its bounding convex hull edge. Joss and Shannon proved in 1973 that a sequence of flipturns eventually transforms any simple polygon into a convex polygon. This paper describes several new results about such flipturn sequences. We show that… ▽ More A flipturn is an operation that transforms a nonconvex simple polygon into another simple polygon, by rotating a concavity 180 degrees around the midpoint of its bounding convex hull edge. Joss and Shannon proved in 1973 that a sequence of flipturns eventually transforms any simple polygon into a convex polygon. This paper describes several new results about such flipturn sequences. We show that any orthogonal polygon is convexified after at most n-5 arbitrary flipturns, or at most 5(n-4)/6 well-chosen flipturns, improving the previously best upper bound of (n-1)!/2. We also show that any simple polygon can be convexified by at most n^2-4n+1 flipturns, generalizing earlier results of Ahn et al. These bounds depend critically on how degenerate cases are handled; we carefully explore several possibilities. We describe how to maintain both a simple polygon and its convex hull in O(log^4 n) time per flipturn, using a data structure of size O(n). We show that although flipturn sequences for the same polygon can have very different lengths, the shape and position of the final convex polygon is the same for all sequences and can be computed in O(n log n) time. Finally, we demonstrate that finding the longest convexifying flipturn sequence of a simple polygon is NP-hard. △ Less

Submitted 16 August, 2000; originally announced August 2000.

Comments: 26 pages, 32 figures, see also http://www.uiuc.edu/~jeffe/pubs/flipturn.html

ACM Class: F.2.2; G.2