Performance of linear solvers in tensor-train format on current multicore architectures
Authors:
Melven Röhrig-Zöllner,
Manuel Joey Becklas,
Jonas Thies,
Achim Basermann
Abstract:
Tensor networks are a class of algorithms aimed at reducing the computational complexity of high-dimensional problems. They are used in an increasing number of applications, from quantum simulations to machine learning. Exploiting data parallelism in these algorithms is key to using modern hardware. However, there are several ways to map required tensor operations onto linear algebra routines ("bu…
▽ More
Tensor networks are a class of algorithms aimed at reducing the computational complexity of high-dimensional problems. They are used in an increasing number of applications, from quantum simulations to machine learning. Exploiting data parallelism in these algorithms is key to using modern hardware. However, there are several ways to map required tensor operations onto linear algebra routines ("building blocks"). Optimizing this mapping impacts the numerical behavior, so computational and numerical aspects must be considered hand-in-hand. In this paper we discuss the performance of solvers for low-rank linear systems in the tensor-train format (also known as matrix-product states). We consider three popular algorithms: TT-GMRES, MALS, and AMEn. We illustrate their computational complexity based on the example of discretizing a simple high-dimensional PDE in, e.g., $50^{10}$ grid points. This shows that the projection to smaller sub-problems for MALS and AMEn reduces the number of floating-point operations by orders of magnitude. We suggest optimizations regarding orthogonalization steps, singular value decompositions, and tensor contractions. In addition, we propose a generic preconditioner based on a TT-rank-1 approximation of the linear operator. Overall, we obtain roughly a 5x speedup over the reference algorithm for the fastest method (AMEn) on a current multicore CPU.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2024; v1 submitted 13 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
Performance of the low-rank tensor-train SVD (TT-SVD) for large dense tensors on modern multi-core CPUs
Authors:
Melven Röhrig-Zöllner,
Jonas Thies,
Achim Basermann
Abstract:
There are several factorizations of multi-dimensional tensors into lower-dimensional components, known as `tensor networks'. We consider the popular `tensor-train' (TT) format and ask: How efficiently can we compute a low-rank approximation from a full tensor on current multi-core CPUs?
Compared to sparse and dense linear algebra, kernel libraries for multi-linear algebra are rare and typically…
▽ More
There are several factorizations of multi-dimensional tensors into lower-dimensional components, known as `tensor networks'. We consider the popular `tensor-train' (TT) format and ask: How efficiently can we compute a low-rank approximation from a full tensor on current multi-core CPUs?
Compared to sparse and dense linear algebra, kernel libraries for multi-linear algebra are rare and typically not as well optimized. Linear algebra libraries like BLAS and LAPACK may provide the required operations in principle, but often at the cost of additional data movements for rearranging memory layouts. Furthermore, these libraries are typically optimized for the compute-bound case (e.g.\ square matrix operations) whereas low-rank tensor decompositions lead to memory bandwidth limited operations.
We propose a `tensor-train singular value decomposition' (TT-SVD) algorithm based on two building blocks: a `Q-less tall-skinny QR' factorization, and a fused tall-skinny matrix-matrix multiplication and reshape operation. We analyze the performance of the resulting TT-SVD algorithm using the Roofline performance model. In addition, we present performance results for different algorithmic variants for shared-memory as well as distributed-memory architectures. Our experiments show that commonly used TT-SVD implementations suffer severe performance penalties. We conclude that a dedicated library for tensor factorization kernels would benefit the community: Computing a low-rank approximation can be as cheap as reading the data twice from main memory. As a consequence, an implementation that achieves realistic performance will move the limit at which one has to resort to randomized methods that only process part of the data.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2022; v1 submitted 29 January, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
