-
On Hilbert's Tenth Problem
Authors:
Michael Pfender
Abstract:
Using an iterated Horner schema for evaluation of diophantine polynomials, we define a partial $μ$-recursive "decision" algorithm decis as a "race" for a first nullstelle versus a first (internal) proof of non-nullity for such a polynomial -- within a given theory T extending Peano Arithmetique PA. If T is diophantine sound, i.e., if (internal) provability implies truth -- for diophantine formulae…
▽ More
Using an iterated Horner schema for evaluation of diophantine polynomials, we define a partial $μ$-recursive "decision" algorithm decis as a "race" for a first nullstelle versus a first (internal) proof of non-nullity for such a polynomial -- within a given theory T extending Peano Arithmetique PA. If T is diophantine sound, i.e., if (internal) provability implies truth -- for diophantine formulae --, then the T-map decis gives correct results when applied to the codes of polynomial inequalities $D(x_1,...,x_m) \neq 0$. The additional hypothesis that T be diophantine complete (in the syntactical sense) would guarantee in addition termination of decis on these formula, i.e., decis would constitute a decision algorithm for diophantine formulae in the sense of Hilbert's 10th problem. From Matiyasevich's impossibility for such a decision it follows, that a consistent theory T extending PA cannot be both diophantine sound and diophantine complete. We infer from this the existence of a diophantine formulae which is undecidable by T. Diophantine correctness is inherited by the diophantine completion T~ of T, and within this extension decis terminates on all externally given diophantine polynomials, correctly. Matiyasevich's theorem -- for the strengthening T~ of T -- then shows that T~, and hence T, cannot be diophantine sound. But since the internal consistency formula Con_T for T implies -- within PA -- diophantine soundness of T, we get that PA derives \neg Con_T, in particular PA must derive its own internal inconsistency formula.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
A positive solution to Hilbert's 10th problem
Authors:
Michael Pfender
Abstract:
Polynome codes and code evaluation; arithmetical theory frames; $μ$-recursive race for decision; decision correctness; decision termination; correct termination in theory $T = PR$ of Primitive Recursion; comparison with the negative result of Matiyasevich; positive solution in p.r. non-infinite-descent theory $πR=PR+(π).$
Polynome codes and code evaluation; arithmetical theory frames; $μ$-recursive race for decision; decision correctness; decision termination; correct termination in theory $T = PR$ of Primitive Recursion; comparison with the negative result of Matiyasevich; positive solution in p.r. non-infinite-descent theory $πR=PR+(π).$
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2014; v1 submitted 2 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Consistency Decision
Authors:
Michael Pfender
Abstract:
The consistency formula for set theory can be stated in terms of the free-variables theory of primitive recursive maps. Free-variable p. r. predicates are decidable by set theory, main result here, built on recursive evaluation of p. r. map codes and soundness of that evaluation in set theoretical frame: internal p. r. map code equality is evaluated into set theoretical equality. So the free-varia…
▽ More
The consistency formula for set theory can be stated in terms of the free-variables theory of primitive recursive maps. Free-variable p. r. predicates are decidable by set theory, main result here, built on recursive evaluation of p. r. map codes and soundness of that evaluation in set theoretical frame: internal p. r. map code equality is evaluated into set theoretical equality. So the free-variable consistency predicate of set theory is decided by set theory, ω-consistency assumed. By Gödel's second incompleteness theorem on undecidability of set theory's consistency formula by set theory under assumption of this ω- consistency, classical set theory turns out to be ω-inconsistent.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
-
Arithmetical Foundations - Recursion. Evaluation. Consistency
Authors:
Michael Pfender
Abstract:
Primitive recursion, mu-recursion, universal object and universe theories, complexity controlled iteration, code evaluation, soundness, decidability, Gödel incompleteness theorems, inconsistency provability for set theory, constructive consistency.
Primitive recursion, mu-recursion, universal object and universe theories, complexity controlled iteration, code evaluation, soundness, decidability, Gödel incompleteness theorems, inconsistency provability for set theory, constructive consistency.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2015; v1 submitted 10 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
RCF4: Inconsistent Quantification
Authors:
Michael Pfender
Abstract:
We exhibit canonical middle-inverse Choice maps within categorical (Free-Variable) Theory of Primitive Recursion as well as in Theory of partial PR maps over the Theory of Primitive Recursion with predicate abstraction. Using these choice-maps, defined by mu-recursion, we address the Consistency problem for a minimal Quantified extension Q of latter two theories: We prove, that Q's exists-define…
▽ More
We exhibit canonical middle-inverse Choice maps within categorical (Free-Variable) Theory of Primitive Recursion as well as in Theory of partial PR maps over the Theory of Primitive Recursion with predicate abstraction. Using these choice-maps, defined by mu-recursion, we address the Consistency problem for a minimal Quantified extension Q of latter two theories: We prove, that Q's exists-defined mu-operator coincides on PR predicates with that inherited from theory of partial PR maps. We strengthen Theory Q by axiomatically forcing the lexicographical order on its omega^omega to become a well-order: "finite descent". Resulting theory admits non-infinit PR-iterative descent schema (pi) which constitutes Cartesian PR Theory piR introduced in RCF2: Evaluation and Consistency.
A suitable Cartesian subSystem of Q + wo(omega^omega) above, extension of piR "inside" Theory Q + wo(omega^omega), is shown to admit code self-evaluation: extension of formally partial code evaluation of piR into a "total" self-evaluation for the subSystem. Appropriate diagonal argument then shows inconsistency of this subsystem and (hence) of its extensions Q + wo(omega^omega) and ZF.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2009; v1 submitted 30 January, 2009;
originally announced January 2009.
-
RCF3: Map-Code Interpretation via Closure
Authors:
Michael Pfender
Abstract:
For a (minimal) Arithmetical theory with higher Order Objects, i.e. a (minimal) Cartesian closed arithmetical theory -- coming as such with the corresponding closed evaluation -- we interprete here map codes, out of [A,B] say,into these maps "themselves", coming as elements ("names") within hom-Objects B^A. The interpretation (family) uses a Chain of Universal Objects U_n, one for each Order str…
▽ More
For a (minimal) Arithmetical theory with higher Order Objects, i.e. a (minimal) Cartesian closed arithmetical theory -- coming as such with the corresponding closed evaluation -- we interprete here map codes, out of [A,B] say,into these maps "themselves", coming as elements ("names") within hom-Objects B^A. The interpretation (family) uses a Chain of Universal Objects U_n, one for each Order stratum with respect to "higher" Order of the Objects. Combined with closed, axiomatic evaluation, this interpretation family gives code-self-evaluation. Via the usual diagonal argument, Antinomie RICHARD then can be formalised within minimal higher Order (Cartesian closed) arithmetical theory, and yields this way inconsistency for all of its extensions, in particular for set theories as ZF, of the Elementary Theory of (higher Order) Topoi with Natural Numbers Object as considered by FREYD, as well as already for the Theory of Cartesian Closed Categories with NNO considered by LAMBEK and SCOTT.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2008;
originally announced September 2008.
-
RCF2: Evaluation and Consistency
Authors:
Michael Pfender
Abstract:
We construct here an iterative evaluation of all PR map codes: progress of this iteration is measured by descending complexity within "Ordinal" O := N[ω] of polynomials in one indeterminate, ordered lexicographically. Non-infinit descent of such iterations is added as a mild additional axiom schema (π_O) to Theory PR_A = PR+(abstr) of Primitive Recursion with predicate abstraction, out of forgoi…
▽ More
We construct here an iterative evaluation of all PR map codes: progress of this iteration is measured by descending complexity within "Ordinal" O := N[ω] of polynomials in one indeterminate, ordered lexicographically. Non-infinit descent of such iterations is added as a mild additional axiom schema (π_O) to Theory PR_A = PR+(abstr) of Primitive Recursion with predicate abstraction, out of forgoing part RCF 1. This then gives (correct) "on"-termination of iterative evaluation of argumented deduction trees as well, for theories PR_A+(π_O). By means of this constructive evaluation the Main Theorem is proved, on Termination-conditioned (Inner) Soundness for such theories, Ordinal O extending N[ω]. As a consequence we get Self-Consistency for these theories, namely derivation of its own free-variable Consistency formula.
As to expect from classical setting, Self-Consistency gives (unconditioned) Objective Soundness. Termination-Conditioned Soundness holds "already" for PR_A, but it turns out that at least present derivation of Consistency from this conditioned Soundness depends on schema (π_O) of non-infinit descent in Ordinal O := \N[ω].
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2009; v1 submitted 23 September, 2008;
originally announced September 2008.
-
RCF1: Theories of PR Maps and Partial PR Maps
Authors:
Michael Pfender
Abstract:
We give to the categorical theory PR of Primitive Recursion a logically simple, algebraic presentation, via equations between maps, plus one genuine Horner type schema, namely Freyd's uniqueness of the initialised iterated. Free Variables are introduced - formally - as another names for projections. Predicates χ: A -> 2 admit interpretation as (formal) Objects {A|χ} of a surrounding Theory PRA =…
▽ More
We give to the categorical theory PR of Primitive Recursion a logically simple, algebraic presentation, via equations between maps, plus one genuine Horner type schema, namely Freyd's uniqueness of the initialised iterated. Free Variables are introduced - formally - as another names for projections. Predicates χ: A -> 2 admit interpretation as (formal) Objects {A|χ} of a surrounding Theory PRA = PR + (abstr) : schema (abstr) formalises this predicate abstraction into additional Objects. Categorical Theory P\hat{R}_A \sqsupset PR_A \sqsupset PR then is the Theory of formally partial PR-maps, having Theory PR_A embedded. This Theory P\hat{R}_A bears the structure of a (still) diagonal monoidal category. It is equivalent to "the" categorical theory of μ-recursion (and of while loops), viewed as partial PR maps. So the present approach to partial maps sheds new light on Church's Thesis, "embedded" into a Free-Variables, formally variable-free (categorical) framework.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2008;
originally announced September 2008.
