Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Paulin, R

On some conjectures of Samuels and Feige

Authors: Roland Paulin

Abstract: Let $μ_1 \ge \dotsc \ge μ_n > 0$ and $μ_1 + \dotsm + μ_n = 1$. Let $X_1, \dotsc, X_n$ be independent non-negative random variables with $EX_1 = \dotsc = EX_n = 1$, and let $Z = \sum_{i=1}^n μ_i X_i$. Let $M = \max_{1 \le i \le n} μ_i = μ_1$, and let $δ> 0$ and $T = 1 + δ$. Both Samuels and Feige formulated conjectures bounding the probability $P(Z < T)$ from above. We prove that Samuels' conjectur… ▽ More Let $μ_1 \ge \dotsc \ge μ_n > 0$ and $μ_1 + \dotsm + μ_n = 1$. Let $X_1, \dotsc, X_n$ be independent non-negative random variables with $EX_1 = \dotsc = EX_n = 1$, and let $Z = \sum_{i=1}^n μ_i X_i$. Let $M = \max_{1 \le i \le n} μ_i = μ_1$, and let $δ> 0$ and $T = 1 + δ$. Both Samuels and Feige formulated conjectures bounding the probability $P(Z < T)$ from above. We prove that Samuels' conjecture implies a conjecture of Feige. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 4 pages

MSC Class: 60G50 (Primary); 60E15 (Secondary)

Largest values of the Stern sequence, alternating binary expansions and continuants

Authors: Roland Paulin

Abstract: We study the largest values of the $r$th row of Stern's diatomic array. In particular, we prove some conjectures of Lansing. Our main tool is the connection between the Stern sequence, alternating binary expansions and continuants. This allows us to reduce the problem of ordering the elements of the Stern sequence to the problem of ordering continuants. We describe an operation that increases the… ▽ More We study the largest values of the $r$th row of Stern's diatomic array. In particular, we prove some conjectures of Lansing. Our main tool is the connection between the Stern sequence, alternating binary expansions and continuants. This allows us to reduce the problem of ordering the elements of the Stern sequence to the problem of ordering continuants. We describe an operation that increases the value of a continuant, allowing us to reduce the problem of largest continuants to ordering continuants of very special shape. Finally, we order these special continuants using some identities and inequalities involving Fibonacci numbers. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: 11 pages

On the minimal degree of morphisms between algebraic curves

Authors: Roland Paulin

Abstract: Given smooth, projective, geometrically integral algebraic curves $X$ and $Y$ defined over a number field $K$, assuming that there is a non-constant $K$-morphism $\varphi \colon X \to Y$, we give an upper bound on the minimum of the degrees of such morphisms. The proof is based on isogeny estimates between abelian varieties. Given smooth, projective, geometrically integral algebraic curves $X$ and $Y$ defined over a number field $K$, assuming that there is a non-constant $K$-morphism $\varphi \colon X \to Y$, we give an upper bound on the minimum of the degrees of such morphisms. The proof is based on isogeny estimates between abelian varieties. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: 16 pages

On the exact region determined by Kendall's tau and Spearman's rho

Authors: Manuela Schreyer, Roland Paulin, Wolfgang Trutschnig

Abstract: Using properties of shuffles of copulas and tools from combinatorics we solve the open question about the exact region $Ω$ determined by all possible values of Kendall's $τ$ and Spearman's $ρ$. In particular, we prove that the well-known inequality established by Durbin and Stuart in 1951 is only sharp on a countable set with sole accumulation point $(-1,-1)$, give a simple analytic characterizati… ▽ More Using properties of shuffles of copulas and tools from combinatorics we solve the open question about the exact region $Ω$ determined by all possible values of Kendall's $τ$ and Spearman's $ρ$. In particular, we prove that the well-known inequality established by Durbin and Stuart in 1951 is only sharp on a countable set with sole accumulation point $(-1,-1)$, give a simple analytic characterization of $Ω$ in terms of a continuous, strictly increasing piecewise concave function, and show that $Ω$ is compact and simply connected but not convex. The results also show that for each $(x,y)\in Ω$ there are mutually completely dependent random variables whose $τ$ and $ρ$ values coincide with $x$ and $y$ respectively. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2017; v1 submitted 16 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: 24 pages, 4 figures

MSC Class: 62H20; 60E15; 28D05; 05A05

Journal ref: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 79 (2), 613-633 (2017)

Elementary resolution of a family of quartic Thue equations over function fields

Authors: Clemens Fuchs, Ana Jurasić, Roland Paulin

Abstract: We consider and completely solve the parametrized family of Thue equations \begin{eqnarray*}X(X-Y)(X+Y)(X-λY)+Y^4=ξ,\end{eqnarray*} where the solutions $x,y$ come from the ring $\mathbb{C}[T]$, the parameter $λ\in\mathbb{C}[T]$ is some non-constant polynomial and $0\neqξ\in\mathbb{C}$. It is a function field analogue of the family solved by Mignotte, Pethő and Roth in the integer case. A feature o… ▽ More We consider and completely solve the parametrized family of Thue equations \begin{eqnarray*}X(X-Y)(X+Y)(X-λY)+Y^4=ξ,\end{eqnarray*} where the solutions $x,y$ come from the ring $\mathbb{C}[T]$, the parameter $λ\in\mathbb{C}[T]$ is some non-constant polynomial and $0\neqξ\in\mathbb{C}$. It is a function field analogue of the family solved by Mignotte, Pethő and Roth in the integer case. A feature of our proof is that we avoid the use of height bounds by considering a smaller relevant ring for which we can determine the units more easily. Because of this, the proof is short and the arguments are very elementary (in particular compared to previous results on parametrized Thue equations over function fields). △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2015; v1 submitted 10 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

Comments: 8 pages

MSC Class: 11D25

An explicit André-Oort type result for P^1(C) x G_m(C) based on logarithmic forms

Authors: Roland Paulin

Abstract: Using linear forms in logarithms we prove an explicit result of André-Oort type for $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}) \times \mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$. In this variation the special points of $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}) \times \mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$ are of the form $(α, λ)$, with $α$ a singular modulus and $λ$ a root of unity. The qualitative version of our result states that if $\mathcal{C}$ is a closed… ▽ More Using linear forms in logarithms we prove an explicit result of André-Oort type for $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}) \times \mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$. In this variation the special points of $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}) \times \mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$ are of the form $(α, λ)$, with $α$ a singular modulus and $λ$ a root of unity. The qualitative version of our result states that if $\mathcal{C}$ is a closed algebraic curve in $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}) \times \mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$, defined over a number field, not containing a horizontal or vertical line, then $\mathcal{C}$ contains only finitely many special points. The proof is based on linear forms in logarithms. This differs completely from the method used by the author recently in the proof of the same kind of statement, where class field theory was applied. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.

Comments: 9 pages

MSC Class: 11G18 (Primary) 11J86 (Secondary)

An explicit André-Oort type result for P^1(C) x G_m(C)

Authors: Roland Paulin

Abstract: Using class field theory we prove an explicit result of André-Oort type for $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}) \times \mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$. In this variation the special points of $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C})$ are the singular moduli, while the special points of $\mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$ are defined to be the roots of unity. Using class field theory we prove an explicit result of André-Oort type for $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}) \times \mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$. In this variation the special points of $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C})$ are the singular moduli, while the special points of $\mathbb{G}_m(\mathbb{C})$ are defined to be the roots of unity. △ Less

Submitted 10 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.

Comments: 10 pages

MSC Class: 11G18 (Primary); 11R37 (Secondary)