Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Owen, J P
-
Pair correlation functions for identifying spatial correlation in discrete domains
Authors:
Enrico Gavagnin,
Jennifer P. Owen,
Christian A. Yates
Abstract:
Identifying and quantifying spatial correlation are important aspects of studying the collective behaviour of multi-agent systems. Pair correlation functions (PCFs) are powerful statistical tools which can provide qualitative and quantitative information about correlation between pairs of agents. Despite the numerous PCFs defined for off-lattice domains, only a few recent studies have considered a…
▽ More
Identifying and quantifying spatial correlation are important aspects of studying the collective behaviour of multi-agent systems. Pair correlation functions (PCFs) are powerful statistical tools which can provide qualitative and quantitative information about correlation between pairs of agents. Despite the numerous PCFs defined for off-lattice domains, only a few recent studies have considered a PCF for discrete domains. Our work extends the study of spatial correlation in discrete domains by defining a new set of PCFs using two natural and intuitive definitions of distance for a square lattice: the taxicab and uniform metric. We show how these PCFs improve upon previous attempts and compare between the quantitative data acquired. We also extend our definitions of the PCF to other types of regular tessellation which have not been studied before, including hexagonal, triangular and cuboidal. Finally, we provide a comprehensive PCF for any tessellation and metric allowing investigation of spatial correlation in irregular lattices for which recognising correlation is less intuitive.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2018; v1 submitted 10 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Effectiveness of sparse Bayesian algorithm for MVAR coefficient estimation in MEG/EEG source-space causality analysis
Authors:
Kensuke Sekihara,
Hagai Attias,
Julia P. Owen,
Srikantan S. Nagarajan
Abstract:
This paper examines the effectiveness of a sparse Bayesian algorithm to estimate multivariate autoregressive coefficients when a large amount of background interference exists. This paper employs computer experiments to compare two methods in the source-space causality analysis: the conventional least-squares method and a sparse Bayesian method. Results of our computer experiments show that the in…
▽ More
This paper examines the effectiveness of a sparse Bayesian algorithm to estimate multivariate autoregressive coefficients when a large amount of background interference exists. This paper employs computer experiments to compare two methods in the source-space causality analysis: the conventional least-squares method and a sparse Bayesian method. Results of our computer experiments show that the interference affects the least-squares method in a very severe manner. It produces large false-positive results, unless the signal-to-interference ratio is very high. On the other hand, the sparse Bayesian method is relatively insensitive to the existence of interference. However, this robustness of the sparse Bayesian method is attained on the scarifies of the detectability of true causal relationship. Our experiments also show that the surrogate data bootstrapping method tends to give a statistical threshold that are too low for the sparse method.
The permutation-test-based method gives a higher (more conservative) threshold and it should be used with the sparse Bayesian method whenever the control period is available.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
