Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Moustaki, I
-
Model Assessment for a Generalised Bayesian Structural Equation Model
Authors:
Konstantinos Vamvourellis,
Konstantinos Kalogeropoulos,
Irini Moustaki
Abstract:
The paper proposes a novel model assessment paradigm aiming to address shortcoming of posterior predictive $p-$values, which provide the default metric of fit for Bayesian structural equation modelling (BSEM). The model framework of the paper focuses on the approximate zero approach, according to which parameters that would before set to zero (e.g. factor loadings) are now formulated to be approxi…
▽ More
The paper proposes a novel model assessment paradigm aiming to address shortcoming of posterior predictive $p-$values, which provide the default metric of fit for Bayesian structural equation modelling (BSEM). The model framework of the paper focuses on the approximate zero approach, according to which parameters that would before set to zero (e.g. factor loadings) are now formulated to be approximate zero via informative priors (Muthen and Asparouhov, 2012). The introduced model assessment procedure monitors the out-of-sample predictive performance of the fitted model, and together with a list of guidelines we provide, one can investigate whether the hypothesised model is supported by the data. We incorporate scoring rules and cross-validation to supplement existing model assessment metrics for Bayesian SEM. The proposed tools can be applied to models for both categorical and continuous data. The modelling of categorical and non-normally distributed continuous data is facilitated with the introduction of an item-individual random effect that can also be used for outlier detection. We study the performance of the proposed methodology via simulations. The factor model for continuous and binary data is fitted to data on the `Big-5' personality scale and the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2022; v1 submitted 4 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
A Note on Likelihood Ratio Tests for Models with Latent Variables
Authors:
Yunxiao Chen,
Irini Moustaki,
Haoran Zhang
Abstract:
The likelihood ratio test (LRT) is widely used for comparing the relative fit of nested latent variable models. Following Wilks' theorem, the LRT is conducted by comparing the LRT statistic with its asymptotic distribution under the restricted model, a $χ^2$-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of free parameters between the two nested models under comparison.…
▽ More
The likelihood ratio test (LRT) is widely used for comparing the relative fit of nested latent variable models. Following Wilks' theorem, the LRT is conducted by comparing the LRT statistic with its asymptotic distribution under the restricted model, a $χ^2$-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of free parameters between the two nested models under comparison. For models with latent variables such as factor analysis, structural equation models and random effects models, however, it is often found that the $χ^2$ approximation does not hold. In this note, we show how the regularity conditions of Wilks' theorem may be violated using three examples of models with latent variables. In addition, a more general theory for LRT is given that provides the correct asymptotic theory for these LRTs. This general theory was first established in Chernoff (1954) and discussed in both van der Vaart (2000) and Drton (2009), but it does not seem to have received enough attention. We illustrate this general theory with the three examples.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2020; v1 submitted 10 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
