-
arXiv:1308.3408 [pdf, ps, other]
Bogomolov multipliers for unitriangular groups
Abstract: The Bogomolov multiplier $B_0(G)$ of a finite group $G$ is defined as the subgroup of the Schur multiplier consisting of the cohomology classes vanishing after restriction to all abelian subgroups of $G$. In this paper we give a positive answer to an open problem posed by Kang and Kunyavskiĭ in \cite{KK}. Namely, we prove that if $G$ is either a unitriangular group over $\f$, a quotient of its low… ▽ More
Submitted 14 November, 2013; v1 submitted 15 August, 2013; originally announced August 2013.
Comments: Some errors are corrected in v2
MSC Class: 14E08; 14M20; 13A50
-
arXiv:1307.0738 [pdf, ps, other]
Bogomolov multipliers for some $p$-groups of nilpotency class 2
Abstract: The Bogomolov multiplier $B_0(G)$ of a finite group $G$ is defined as the subgroup of the Schur multiplier consisting of the cohomology classes vanishing after restriction to all abelian subgroups of $G$. The triviality of the Bogomolov multiplier is an obstruction to Noether's problem. We show that if $G$ is a central product of $G_1$ and $G_2$, regarding $K_i\leq Z(G_i), i=1,2$, and… ▽ More
Submitted 18 July, 2016; v1 submitted 2 July, 2013; originally announced July 2013.
Comments: This is the revised version which appeared in Acta Math. Sinica (English Series). arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1304.1890
MSC Class: 14E08; 14M20; 13A50; 12F12
Journal ref: Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, May 2016, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 541-552
-
arXiv:1304.1890 [pdf, ps, other]
Noether's problem for abelian extensions of cyclic $p$-groups II
Abstract: Let $K$ be a field and $G$ be a finite group. Let $G$ act on the rational function field $K(x(g):g\in G)$ by $K$ automorphisms defined by $g\cdot x(h)=x(gh)$ for any $g,h\in G$. Denote by $K(G)$ the fixed field $K(x(g):g\in G)^G$. Noether's problem then asks whether $K(G)$ is rational (i.e., purely transcendental) over $K$. Let $p$ be any prime and let $G$ be a $p$-group of exponent $p^e$. Assume… ▽ More
Submitted 15 September, 2013; v1 submitted 6 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.
Comments: In this version I proved Noether's problem for all $p$-groups of nilpotency class 2, which have the ABC (Abelian-By-Cyclic) property. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1307.0738; and text overlap with arXiv:0911.1162 by other authors
-
arXiv:1301.7284 [pdf, ps, other]
Noether's problem for abelian extensions of cyclic $p$-groups
Abstract: Let $K$ be a field and $G$ be a finite group. Let $G$ act on the rational function field $K(x(g):g\in G)$ by $K$ automorphisms defined by $g\cdot x(h)=x(gh)$ for any $g,h\in G$. Denote by $K(G)$ the fixed field $K(x(g):g\in G)^G$. Noether's problem then asks whether $K(G)$ is rational (i.e., purely transcendental) over $K$. The first main result of this article is that $K(G)$ is rational over $K$… ▽ More
Submitted 30 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.
Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1201.5555; and text overlap with arXiv:1201.5555, arXiv:0911.1162 by other authors
MSC Class: 14E08; 14M20; 13A50; 12F12
Journal ref: Pacific J. Math. 270 (2014) 167-189
-
arXiv:1201.5555 [pdf, ps, other]
Noether's problem for $p$-groups with an abelian subgroup of index $p$
Abstract: Let $K$ be a field and $G$ be a finite group. Let $G$ act on the rational function field $K(x(g):g\in G)$ by $K$-automorphisms defined by $g\cdot x(h)=x(gh)$ for any $g,h\in G$. Denote by $K(G)$ the fixed field $K(x(g):g\in G)^G$. Noether's problem then asks whether $K(G)$ is rational over $K$. Let $p$ be an odd prime and let $G$ be a $p$-group of exponent $p^e$. Assume also that {\rm (i)} char… ▽ More
Submitted 3 September, 2013; v1 submitted 26 January, 2012; originally announced January 2012.
Comments: I added a new theorem for groups of order p^5. The paper will appear in Algebra Colloquium. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:0911.1162 by other authors
MSC Class: 12F12; 13A50; 11R32; 14E08
-
arXiv:1201.2594 [pdf, ps, other]
Galois realizability of groups of orders $p^5$ and $p^6$
Abstract: Let $p$ be an odd prime, and let $k$ be an arbitrary field of characteristic not $p$. In this article we determine the obstructions for the realizability as Galois groups over $k$ of all groups of orders $p^5$ and $p^6$, that have an abelian quotient obtained by factoring out central subgroups of order $p$ or $p^2$. These obstructions are decomposed as products of $p$-cyclic algebras, provided tha… ▽ More
Submitted 5 June, 2012; v1 submitted 12 January, 2012; originally announced January 2012.
Comments: In this version I corrected the statements of the main results. The paper will appear in Central European Journal of Mathematics
-
arXiv:1112.1522 [pdf, ps, other]
On realizability of $p$-groups as Galois groups
Abstract: In this article we survey and examine the realizability of $p$-groups as Galois groups over arbitrary fields. In particular we consider various cohomological criteria that lead to necessary and sufficient conditions for the realizability of such a group as a Galois group, the embedding problem (i.e., realizability over a given subextension), descriptions of such extensions, automatic realizations… ▽ More
Submitted 5 January, 2012; v1 submitted 7 December, 2011; originally announced December 2011.
Comments: In this version is added an example at the end of Section 6. Also, some mistakes are corrected and the references are updated
-
arXiv:1108.5532 [pdf, ps, other]
Noether's problem for central extensions of metacyclic $p$-groups
Abstract: Let $K$ be a field and $G$ be a finite group. Let $G$ act on the rational function field $K(x(g):g\in G)$ by $K$ automorphisms defined by $g\cdot x(h)=x(gh)$ for any $g,h\in G$. Denote by $K(G)$ the fixed field $K(x(g):g\in G)^G$. Noether's problem then asks whether $K(G)$ is rational over $K$. In [M. Kang, Noether's problem for metacyclic $p$-groups, Adv. Math. 203(2005), 554-567], Kang proves th… ▽ More
Submitted 15 September, 2011; v1 submitted 29 August, 2011; originally announced August 2011.
MSC Class: 12F12; 13A50; 11R32; 14E08
-
arXiv:1108.3379 [pdf, ps, other]
Noether's problem for the groups with a cyclic subgroup of index 4
Abstract: Let $G$ be a finite group and $k$ be a field. Let $G$ act on the rational function field $k(x_g:g\in G)$ by $k$-automorphisms defined by $g\cdot x_h=x_{gh}$ for any $g,h\in G$. Noether's problem asks whether the fixed field $k(G)=k(x_g:g\in G)^G$ is rational (i.e. purely transcendental) over $k$. Theorem 1. If $G$ is a group of order $2^n$ ($n\ge 4$) and of exponent $2^e$ such that (i) $e\ge n-2$… ▽ More
Submitted 16 August, 2011; originally announced August 2011.
Comments: arXiv admin note: incorporates virtually all of arXiv:1009.2299
MSC Class: 13A50
-
Noether's problem for some 2-groups
Abstract: Let $G$ be a finite group and $k$ be a field. Let $G$ act on the rational function field $k(x_g:g\in G)$ by $k$-automorphisms defined by $g\cdot x_h=x_{gh}$ for any $g,h\in G$. Noether's problem asks whether the fixed field $k(G)=k(x_g:g\in G)^G$ is rational (i.e. purely transcendental) over $k$. We will prove that, if $G$ is a group of order $2^n$ ($n\ge 4$) and of exponent $2^e$ such that (i)… ▽ More
Submitted 5 September, 2011; v1 submitted 13 September, 2010; originally announced September 2010.
Comments: The content of this paper became part of a new paper "Noether's problem for the groups with a cyclic subgroup of index 4" which has been posted in arXiv
MSC Class: 13A50; 14E08; 14M20; 12F12