-
Relating the outer-independent total Roman domination number with some classical parameters of graphs
Authors:
Abel Cabrera Martínez,
Dorota Kuziak,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
For a given graph $G$ without isolated vertex we consider a function $f: V(G) \rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$. For every $i\in \{0,1,2\}$, let $V_i=\{v\in V(G):\; f(v)=i\}$. The function $f$ is known to be an outer-independent total Roman dominating function for the graph $G$ if it is satisfied that; (i) every vertex in $V_0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $V_2$; (ii) $V_0$ is an independent set; an…
▽ More
For a given graph $G$ without isolated vertex we consider a function $f: V(G) \rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$. For every $i\in \{0,1,2\}$, let $V_i=\{v\in V(G):\; f(v)=i\}$. The function $f$ is known to be an outer-independent total Roman dominating function for the graph $G$ if it is satisfied that; (i) every vertex in $V_0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $V_2$; (ii) $V_0$ is an independent set; and (iii) the subgraph induced by $V_1\cup V_2$ has no isolated vertex. The minimum possible weight $ω(f)=\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$ among all outer-independent total Roman dominating functions for $G$ is called the outer-independent total Roman domination number of $G$. In this article we obtain new tight bounds for this parameter that improve some well-known results. Such bounds can also be seen as relationships between this parameter and several other classical parameters in graph theory like the domination, total domination, Roman domination, independence, and vertex cover numbers. In addition, we compute the outer-independent total Roman domination number of Sierpiński graphs, circulant graphs, and the Cartesian and direct products of complete graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
On the $2$-packing differential of a graph
Authors:
A. Cabrera Martinez,
M. L. Puertas,
J. A. Rodriguez-Velazquez
Abstract:
Let $G$ be a graph of order $n(G)$ and vertex set $V(G)$. Given a set $S\subseteq V(G)$, we define the external neighbourhood of $S$ as the set $N_e(S)$ of all vertices in $V(G)\setminus S$ having at least one neighbour in $S$. The differential of $S$ is defined to be $\partial(S)=|N_e(S)|-|S|$. In this paper, we introduce the study of the $2$-packing differential of a graph, which we define as…
▽ More
Let $G$ be a graph of order $n(G)$ and vertex set $V(G)$. Given a set $S\subseteq V(G)$, we define the external neighbourhood of $S$ as the set $N_e(S)$ of all vertices in $V(G)\setminus S$ having at least one neighbour in $S$. The differential of $S$ is defined to be $\partial(S)=|N_e(S)|-|S|$. In this paper, we introduce the study of the $2$-packing differential of a graph, which we define as $\partial_{2p}(G)=\max\{\partial(S): S\subseteq V(G) \text{ is a }2\text{-packing}\}.$ We show that the $2$-packing differential is closely related to several graph parameters, including the packing number, the independent domination number, the total domination number, the perfect differential, and the unique response Roman domination number. In particular, we show that the theory of $2$-packing differentials is an appropriate framework to investigate the unique response Roman domination number of a graph without the use of functions. Among other results, we obtain a Gallai-type theorem, which states that $\partial_{2p}(G)+μ_{_R}(G)=n(G)$, where $μ_{_R}(G)$ denotes the unique response Roman domination number of $G$. As a consequence of the study, we derive several combinatorial results on $μ_{_R}(G)$, and we show that the problem of finding this parameter is NP-hard. In addition, the particular case of lexicographic product graphs is discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
From the strong differential to Italian domination in graphs
Authors:
A. Cabrera Martinez,
J. A. Rodriguez-Velazquez
Abstract:
Given a graph $G$ and a subset of vertices $D\subseteq V(G)$, the external neighbourhood of $D$ is defined as $N_e(D)=\{u\in V(G)\setminus D:\, N(u)\cap D\ne \varnothing\}$, where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighbourhood of $u$. Now, given a subset $D\subseteq V(G)$ and a vertex $v\in D$, the external private neighbourhood of $v$ with respect to $D$ is defined to be…
▽ More
Given a graph $G$ and a subset of vertices $D\subseteq V(G)$, the external neighbourhood of $D$ is defined as $N_e(D)=\{u\in V(G)\setminus D:\, N(u)\cap D\ne \varnothing\}$, where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighbourhood of $u$. Now, given a subset $D\subseteq V(G)$ and a vertex $v\in D$, the external private neighbourhood of $v$ with respect to $D$ is defined to be $epn(v,D)=\{u\in V(G)\setminus D: N(u)\cap D=\{v\}\}.$ The strong differential of a set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is defined as $\partial_s(D)=|N_e(D)|-|D_w|,$ where $D_w=\{v\in D: epn(v,D)\neq \varnothing\}$. In this paper we focus on the study of the strong differential of a graph, which is defined as $$\partial_s(G)=\max \{\partial_s(D): D\subseteq V(G)\}.$$ Among other results, we obtain general bounds on $\partial_s(G)$ and we prove a Gallai-type theorem, which states that $\partial_s(G)+γ_{I}(G)=n(G)$, where $γ_{I}G)$ denotes the Italian domination number of $G$. Therefore, we can see the theory of strong differential in graphs as a new approach to the theory of Italian domination. One of the advantages of this approach is that it allows us to study the Italian domination number without the use of functions. As we can expect, we derive new results on the Italian domination number of a graph.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Roman domination in direct product graphs and rooted product graphs
Authors:
Abel Cabrera Martinez,
Iztok Peterin,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$. A function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a Roman dominating function on $G$ if every vertex $v\in V(G)$ for which $f(v)=0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $u\in V(G)$ such that $f(u)=2$. The Roman domination number of $G$ is the minimum weight $ω(f)=\sum_{x\in V(G)}f(x)$ among all Roman dominating functions $f$ on $G$. In this article we study the R…
▽ More
Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$. A function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a Roman dominating function on $G$ if every vertex $v\in V(G)$ for which $f(v)=0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $u\in V(G)$ such that $f(u)=2$. The Roman domination number of $G$ is the minimum weight $ω(f)=\sum_{x\in V(G)}f(x)$ among all Roman dominating functions $f$ on $G$. In this article we study the Roman domination number of direct product graphs and rooted product graphs. Specifically, we give several tight lower and upper bounds for the Roman domination number of direct product graphs involving some parameters of the factors, which include the domination, (total) Roman domination, and packing numbers among others. On the other hand, we prove that the Roman domination number of rooted product graphs can attain only three possible values, which depend on the order, the domination, and the Roman domination numbers of the factors in the product. In addition, theoretical characterizations of the classes of rooted product graphs achieving each of these three possible values are given.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
From (secure) w-domination in graphs to protection of lexicographic product graphs
Authors:
Abel Cabrera Martinez,
Alejandro Estrada Moreno,
Juan Alberto Rodriguez-Velazquez
Abstract:
Let $w=(w_0,w_1, \dots,w_l)$ be a vector of nonnegative integers such that $ w_0\ge 1$. Let $G$ be a graph and $N(v)$ the open neighbourhood of $v\in V(G)$. We say that a function $f: V(G)\longrightarrow \{0,1,\dots ,l\}$ is a $w$-dominating function if $f(N(v))=\sum_{u\in N(v)}f(u)\ge w_i$ for every vertex $v$ with $f(v)=i$. The weight of $f$ is defined to be $ω(f)=\sum_{v\in V(G)} f(v)$. Given a…
▽ More
Let $w=(w_0,w_1, \dots,w_l)$ be a vector of nonnegative integers such that $ w_0\ge 1$. Let $G$ be a graph and $N(v)$ the open neighbourhood of $v\in V(G)$. We say that a function $f: V(G)\longrightarrow \{0,1,\dots ,l\}$ is a $w$-dominating function if $f(N(v))=\sum_{u\in N(v)}f(u)\ge w_i$ for every vertex $v$ with $f(v)=i$. The weight of $f$ is defined to be $ω(f)=\sum_{v\in V(G)} f(v)$. Given a $w$-dominating function $f$ and any pair of adjacent vertices $v, u\in V(G)$ with $f(v)=0$ and $f(u)>0$, the function $f_{u\rightarrow v}$ is defined by $f_{u\rightarrow v}(v)=1$, $f_{u\rightarrow v}(u)=f(u)-1$ and $f_{u\rightarrow v}(x)=f(x)$ for every $x\in V(G)\setminus\{u,v\}$. We say that a $w$-dominating function $f$ is a secure $w$-dominating function if for every $v$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists $u\in N(v)$ such that $f(u)>0$ and $f_{u\rightarrow v}$ is a $w$-dominating function as well. The (secure) $w$-domination number of $G$, denoted by ($γ_{w}^s(G)$) $γ_{w}(G)$, is defined as the minimum weight among all (secure) $w$-dominating functions.
In this paper, we show how the secure (total) domination number and the (total) weak Roman domination number of lexicographic product graphs $G\circ H$ are related to $γ_w^s(G)$ or $γ_w(G)$. For the case of the secure domination number and the weak Roman domination number, the decision on whether $w$ takes specific components will depend on the value of $γ_{(1,0)}^s(H)$, while in the case of the total version of these parameters, the decision will depend on the value of $γ_{(1,1)}^s(H)$.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
A note on the k-tuple domination number of graphs
Authors:
Abel Cabrera Martinez
Abstract:
In a graph $G$, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbours. A set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is said to be a $k$-tuple dominating set of $G$ if $D$ dominates every vertex of $G$ at least $k$ times. The minimum cardinality among all $k$-tuple dominating sets is the $k$-tuple domination number of $G$. In this paper, we provide new bounds on this parameter. Some of these bounds generalize other ones that ha…
▽ More
In a graph $G$, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbours. A set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is said to be a $k$-tuple dominating set of $G$ if $D$ dominates every vertex of $G$ at least $k$ times. The minimum cardinality among all $k$-tuple dominating sets is the $k$-tuple domination number of $G$. In this paper, we provide new bounds on this parameter. Some of these bounds generalize other ones that have been given for the case $k=2$. In addition, we improve two well-known lower bounds on the $k$-tuple domination number.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2022; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
A note on double domination in graphs
Authors:
Abel Cabrera Martinez,
Juan A. Rodriguez-Velazquez
Abstract:
Recently, Haynes, Hedetniemi and Henning published the book Topics in Domination in Graphs, which comprises 16 contributions that present advanced topics in graph domination, featuring open problems, modern techniques, and recent results. One of these contributions is the chapter Multiple Domination, by Hansberg and Volkmann, where they put into context all relevant research results on multiple do…
▽ More
Recently, Haynes, Hedetniemi and Henning published the book Topics in Domination in Graphs, which comprises 16 contributions that present advanced topics in graph domination, featuring open problems, modern techniques, and recent results. One of these contributions is the chapter Multiple Domination, by Hansberg and Volkmann, where they put into context all relevant research results on multiple domination that have been found up to 2020. In this note, we show how to improve some results on double domination that are included in the book.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2021; v1 submitted 21 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Total Roman 2-domination in graphs
Authors:
Suitberto Cabrera Garcia,
Abel Cabrera Martinez,
Frank A. Hernandez Mira,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a function $f:V\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a total Roman $\{2\}$-dominating function if: (1) every vertex $v\in V$ for which $f(v)=0$ satisfies that $\sum_{u\in N(v)}f(u)\geq 2$, where $N(v)$ represents the open neighborhood of $v$, and (2) every vertex $x\in V$ for which $f(x)\geq 1$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $y\in V$ such that $f(y)\geq 1$. The weight of the funct…
▽ More
Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a function $f:V\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a total Roman $\{2\}$-dominating function if: (1) every vertex $v\in V$ for which $f(v)=0$ satisfies that $\sum_{u\in N(v)}f(u)\geq 2$, where $N(v)$ represents the open neighborhood of $v$, and (2) every vertex $x\in V$ for which $f(x)\geq 1$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $y\in V$ such that $f(y)\geq 1$. The weight of the function $f$ is defined as $ω(f)=\sum_{v\in V}f(v)$. The total Roman $\{2\}$-domination number, denoted by $γ_{t\{R2\}}(G)$, is the minimum weight among all total Roman $\{2\}$-dominating functions on $G$. In this article we introduce the concepts above and begin the study of its combinatorial and computational properties. For instance, we give several closed relationships between this parameter and other domination related parameters in graphs. In addition, we prove that the complexity of computing the value $γ_{t\{R2\}}(G)$ is NP-hard, even when restricted to bipartite or chordal graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Perfect domination, Roman domination and perfect Roman domination in lexicographic product graphs
Authors:
A. Cabrera Martinez,
C. Garcia-Gomez,
J. A. Rodriguez-Velazquez
Abstract:
The aim of this paper is to obtain closed formulas for the perfect domination number, the Roman domination number and the perfect Roman domination number of lexicographic product graphs. We show that these formulas can be obtained relatively easily for the case of the first two parameters. The picture is quite different when it concerns the perfect Roman domination number. In this case, we obtain…
▽ More
The aim of this paper is to obtain closed formulas for the perfect domination number, the Roman domination number and the perfect Roman domination number of lexicographic product graphs. We show that these formulas can be obtained relatively easily for the case of the first two parameters. The picture is quite different when it concerns the perfect Roman domination number. In this case, we obtain general bounds and then we give sufficient and/or necessary conditions for the bounds to be achieved. We also discuss the case of perfect Roman graphs and we characterize the lexicographic product graphs where the perfect Roman domination number equals the Roman domination number.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2022; v1 submitted 6 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
From Italian domination in lexicographic product graphs to w-domination in graphs
Authors:
A. Cabrera Martinez,
A. Estrada-Moreno,
J. A. Rodriguez-Velazquez
Abstract:
In this paper, we show that the Italian domination number of every lexicographic product graph $G\circ H$ can be expressed in terms of five different domination parameters of $G$. These parameters can be defined under the following unified approach, which encompasses the definition of several well-known domination parameters and introduces new ones. Let $N(v)$ denote the open neighbourhood of…
▽ More
In this paper, we show that the Italian domination number of every lexicographic product graph $G\circ H$ can be expressed in terms of five different domination parameters of $G$. These parameters can be defined under the following unified approach, which encompasses the definition of several well-known domination parameters and introduces new ones. Let $N(v)$ denote the open neighbourhood of $v\in V(G)$, and let $w=(w_0,w_1, \dots,w_l)$ be a vector of nonnegative integers such that $ w_0\ge 1$. We say that a function $f: V(G)\longrightarrow \{0,1,\dots ,l\}$ is a $w$-dominating function if $f(N(v))=\sum_{u\in N(v)}f(u)\ge w_i$ for every vertex $v$ with $f(v)=i$. The weight of $f$ is defined to be $ω(f)=\sum_{v\in V(G)} f(v)$. The $w$-domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{w}(G)$, is the minimum weight among all $w$-dominating functions on $G$. If we impose restrictions on the minimum degree of $G$ when needed, under this approach we can define, for instance, the domination number, the total domination number, the $k$-domination number, the $k$-tuple domination number, the $k$-tuple total domination number, the Italian domination number, the total Italian domination number, and the $\{k\}$-domination number. Specifically, we show that $γ_{I}(G\circ H)=γ_{w}(G)$, where $w\in \{2\}\times\{0,1,2\}^{l}$ and $l\in \{2,3\}$. The decision on whether the equality holds for specific values of $w_0,\dots,w_l$ will depend on the value of the domination number of $H$. This paper also provides preliminary results on $γ_{w}(G)$ and raises the challenge of conducting a detailed study of the topic.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2021; v1 submitted 10 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Double domination in lexicographic product graphs
Authors:
A. Cabrera Martinez,
S. Cabrera Garcia,
J. A. Rodriguez-Velazquez
Abstract:
In a graph $G$, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbours. A subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ is said to be a double dominating set of $G$ if $S$ dominates every vertex of $G$ at least twice. The minimum cardinality among all double dominating sets of $G$ is the double domination number. In this article, we obtain tight bounds and closed formulas for the double domination number of lexicographic produc…
▽ More
In a graph $G$, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbours. A subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ is said to be a double dominating set of $G$ if $S$ dominates every vertex of $G$ at least twice. The minimum cardinality among all double dominating sets of $G$ is the double domination number. In this article, we obtain tight bounds and closed formulas for the double domination number of lexicographic product graphs $G\circ H$ in terms of invariants of the factor graphs $G$ and $H$.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Dominating the direct product of two graphs through total Roman strategies
Authors:
Abel Cabrera Martinez,
Dorota Kuziak,
Iztok Peterin,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
Given a graph $G$ without isolated vertices, a total Roman dominating function for $G$ is a function $f : V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ such that every vertex with label 0 is adjacent to a vertex with label 2, and the set of vertices with positive labels induces a graph of minimum degree at least one. The total Roman domination number $γ_{tR}(G)$ of $G$ is the smallest possible value of…
▽ More
Given a graph $G$ without isolated vertices, a total Roman dominating function for $G$ is a function $f : V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ such that every vertex with label 0 is adjacent to a vertex with label 2, and the set of vertices with positive labels induces a graph of minimum degree at least one. The total Roman domination number $γ_{tR}(G)$ of $G$ is the smallest possible value of $\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$ among all total Roman dominating functions $f$. The total Roman domination number of the direct product $G\times H$ of the graphs $G$ and $H$ is studied in this work. Specifically, several relationships, in the shape of upper and lower bounds, between $γ_{tR}(G\times H)$ and some classical domination parameters for the factors are given. Characterizations of the direct product graphs $G\times H$ achieving small values ($\le 7$) for $γ_{tR}(G\times H)$ are presented, and exact values for $γ_{tR}(G\times H)$ are deduced, while considering various specific direct product classes.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
A note on total co-independent domination in trees
Authors:
Abel Cabrera Martínez,
Frank A. Hernández Mira,
José M. Sigarreta Almira,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of any total dominating set of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_t(G)$. The total dominating set $D$ is called a total co-independent dominating set if $V(G)\setminus D$ is an independent set and has at least one verte…
▽ More
A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of any total dominating set of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_t(G)$. The total dominating set $D$ is called a total co-independent dominating set if $V(G)\setminus D$ is an independent set and has at least one vertex. The minimum cardinality of any total co-independent dominating set is denoted by $γ_{t,coi}(G)$. In this paper, we show that, for any tree $T$ of order $n$ and diameter at least three, $n-β(T)\leq γ_{t,coi}(T)\leq n-|L(T)|$ where $β(T)$ is the maximum cardinality of any independent set and $L(T)$ is the set of leaves of $T$. We also characterize the families of trees attaining the extremal bounds above and show that the differences between the value of $γ_{t,coi}(T)$ and these bounds can be arbitrarily large for some classes of trees.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
On computational and combinatorial properties of the total co-independent domination number of graphs
Authors:
Abel Cabrera Martinez,
Frank A. Hernandez Mira,
Jose M. Sigarreta Almira,
Ismael G. Yero
Abstract:
A subset $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $D$. The total dominating set $D$ is called a total co-independent dominating set if the subgraph induced by $V-D$ is edgeless and has at least one vertex. The minimum cardinality of any total co-independent dominating set is the total co-independent domination number of…
▽ More
A subset $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $D$. The total dominating set $D$ is called a total co-independent dominating set if the subgraph induced by $V-D$ is edgeless and has at least one vertex. The minimum cardinality of any total co-independent dominating set is the total co-independent domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_{t,coi}(G)$. In this work we study some complexity and combinatorial properties of $γ_{t,coi}(G)$. Specifically, we prove that deciding whether $γ_{t,coi}(G)\le k$ for a given integer $k$ is an NP-complete problem and give several bounds on $γ_{t,coi}(G)$. Also, since any total co-independent dominating set is also a total dominating set, we characterize all the trees having equal total co-independent domination number and total domination number.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2017; v1 submitted 2 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Insertion-tolerance and repetitiveness of random graphs
Authors:
Fernando Alcalde Cuesta,
Álvaro Lozano Rojo,
Antón C. Vázquez Martínez
Abstract:
Bond percolation on Cayley graphs provides examples of random graphs. Other examples arise from the dynamical study of proper repetitive subgraphs of Cayley graphs. In this paper we demonstrate that these two families have mutually singular laws as a corollary of a general lemma about countable Borel equivalence relations on first countable Hausdorff spaces.
Bond percolation on Cayley graphs provides examples of random graphs. Other examples arise from the dynamical study of proper repetitive subgraphs of Cayley graphs. In this paper we demonstrate that these two families have mutually singular laws as a corollary of a general lemma about countable Borel equivalence relations on first countable Hausdorff spaces.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2016; v1 submitted 19 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
