Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Laytimi, F

Anti-ample bundle, nef vector bundle, big vector bundle

Authors: Indranil Biswas, Fatima Laytimi, D. S. Nagaraj, Werner Nahm

Abstract: We prove that the direct image of an anti-ample vector bundle is anti-ample under any finite flat morphism of non-singular projective varieties. In the second part we prove some properties of big and nef vector bundles. In particular it is shown that the tensor product of a nef vector bundle with a nef and big vector bundle is again nef and big. This generalizes a result of Schneider. We prove that the direct image of an anti-ample vector bundle is anti-ample under any finite flat morphism of non-singular projective varieties. In the second part we prove some properties of big and nef vector bundles. In particular it is shown that the tensor product of a nef vector bundle with a nef and big vector bundle is again nef and big. This generalizes a result of Schneider. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: 7 pages. To be published in Journal of Geometry and Physics

MSC Class: 14F17; 14J60

On the direct image of the adjoint line bundle

Authors: Indranil Biswas, Fatima Laytimi, D. S. Nagaraj, Werner Nahm

Abstract: We give an algebraic-geometric proof of the fact that for a smooth fibration $π: X \longrightarrow Y$ of projective varieties, the direct image $π_*(L\otimes K_{X/Y})$ of the adjoint line bundle of an ample (respectively, nef and $π$-strongly big) line bundle $L$ is ample (respectively, nef and big). We give an algebraic-geometric proof of the fact that for a smooth fibration $π: X \longrightarrow Y$ of projective varieties, the direct image $π_*(L\otimes K_{X/Y})$ of the adjoint line bundle of an ample (respectively, nef and $π$-strongly big) line bundle $L$ is ample (respectively, nef and big). △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

MSC Class: 14F17; 14J60

Ampleness equivalence and dominance for vector bundles

Authors: F. Laytimi, W. Nahm

Abstract: Hartshorne in "Ample vector bundles" proved that $E$ is ample if and only if $\OOO_{P(E)}(1)$ is ample. Here we generalize this result to flag manifolds associated to a vector bundle $E$ on a complex manifold $X$: For a partition $a$ we show that the line bundle $\it Q_a^s$ on the corresponding flag manifold $\mathcal{F}l_s(E)$ is ample if and only if $ \SSS_aE $ is ample. In particular $\det Q$ o… ▽ More Hartshorne in "Ample vector bundles" proved that $E$ is ample if and only if $\OOO_{P(E)}(1)$ is ample. Here we generalize this result to flag manifolds associated to a vector bundle $E$ on a complex manifold $X$: For a partition $a$ we show that the line bundle $\it Q_a^s$ on the corresponding flag manifold $\mathcal{F}l_s(E)$ is ample if and only if $ \SSS_aE $ is ample. In particular $\det Q$ on $\it{G}_r(E)$ is ample if and only if $\wedge ^rE$ is ample.\\ We give also a proof of the Ampleness Dominance theorem that does not depend on the saturation property of the Littlewood-Richardson semigroup. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Remarks on Ramanujam-Kawamata-Viehweg Vanishing Theorem

Authors: F. Laytimi, D. S. Nagaraj

Abstract: In this article we prove a general result on a nef vector bundle $E$ on a projective manifold $X$ of dimension $n$ depending on the vector space $H^{n,n} (X, E). $ It is also shown that $H^{n,n} (X, E)=0$ for an indecomposable nef rank 2 vector bundles $E$ on some specific type of $n$ dimensional projective manifold $X.$ The same vanishing shown to hold for indecomposable nef and big rank 2 vector… ▽ More In this article we prove a general result on a nef vector bundle $E$ on a projective manifold $X$ of dimension $n$ depending on the vector space $H^{n,n} (X, E). $ It is also shown that $H^{n,n} (X, E)=0$ for an indecomposable nef rank 2 vector bundles $E$ on some specific type of $n$ dimensional projective manifold $X.$ The same vanishing shown to hold for indecomposable nef and big rank 2 vector bundles on any variety with trivial canonical bundle. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Semiample and k-ample vector bundles

Authors: F. Laytimi, W. Nahm

Abstract: We show that tensor products of semiample vector bundles are semiample. For k-ampleness in the sens of Sommese, we show that over compact complex manifolds tensor products of semiample and k-ample vector bundles are k-ample, and the sum of k-ample vector bundles is k-ample. In particular results of Sommese on k-ampleness are strenghtened. We show that tensor products of semiample vector bundles are semiample. For k-ampleness in the sens of Sommese, we show that over compact complex manifolds tensor products of semiample and k-ample vector bundles are k-ample, and the sum of k-ample vector bundles is k-ample. In particular results of Sommese on k-ampleness are strenghtened. △ Less

Submitted 25 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1211.6281

MSC Class: 14F17

Projections of Veronese surface and Morphisms from projective plane to Grassmannian

Authors: A. El Mazouni, F. Laytimi, D. S. Nagaraj

Abstract: In this note we describe the image of $\PP^2$ in $ Gr(2, \CC^{4})$ under a morphism given by a rank two vector bundle on $\PP^2$ with Chern classes $(2,2).$ In this note we describe the image of $\PP^2$ in $ Gr(2, \CC^{4})$ under a morphism given by a rank two vector bundle on $\PP^2$ with Chern classes $(2,2).$ △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: To appear in Proc. Indaian. Acd. of Sci

Generation by sections and $k$-ampleness

Authors: Werner Nahm, Fatima Laytimi

Abstract: In the article "Submanifold of abelian varieties", A.J. Sommese proved that direct sum and tensor product of two vector bundles $E$ and $F$ over a smooth projective variety are $k$-ample if $E$ and $F$ are $k$-ample and are generated by global sections. Here we show that the latter condition is not needed. In the article "Submanifold of abelian varieties", A.J. Sommese proved that direct sum and tensor product of two vector bundles $E$ and $F$ over a smooth projective variety are $k$-ample if $E$ and $F$ are $k$-ample and are generated by global sections. Here we show that the latter condition is not needed. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2012; originally announced November 2012.

Comments: 8 pages

MSC Class: 1991: 14F17

Parabolic k-ample bundles

Authors: Indranil Biswas, Fatima Laytimi

Abstract: We construct projectivization of a parabolic vector bundle and a tautological line bundle over it. It is shown that a parabolic vector bundle is ample if and only if the tautological line bundle is ample. This allows us to generalize the notion of a k-ample bundle, introduced by Sommese, to the context of parabolic bundles. A parabolic vector bundle $E_*$ is defined to be k-ample if the tautologic… ▽ More We construct projectivization of a parabolic vector bundle and a tautological line bundle over it. It is shown that a parabolic vector bundle is ample if and only if the tautological line bundle is ample. This allows us to generalize the notion of a k-ample bundle, introduced by Sommese, to the context of parabolic bundles. A parabolic vector bundle $E_*$ is defined to be k-ample if the tautological line bundle ${\mathcal O}_{{\mathbb P}(E_*)}(1)$ is $k$--ample. We establish some properties of parabolic k-ample bundles. △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2011; originally announced March 2011.

Comments: Final version

MSC Class: 14F05; 14F17

Morphisms from P2 to Gr(2,C4)

Authors: A. El Mazouni, Fatima Laytimi, D. S. Nagaraj

Abstract: In this note we study morphisms from P2 to Gr(2,C4) from the point of view of the cohomology class they represent in the Grassmannian. This leads to some new result about projection of d-uple imbedding of P2 to P5. In this note we study morphisms from P2 to Gr(2,C4) from the point of view of the cohomology class they represent in the Grassmannian. This leads to some new result about projection of d-uple imbedding of P2 to P5. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2009; originally announced November 2009.

A generalization of Le Potier's vanishing theorem

Authors: F. Laytimi, W. Nahm

Abstract: We prove a new vanishing theorem generalizing that of Le Potier for Schur functors of a vector bundle. We prove a new vanishing theorem generalizing that of Le Potier for Schur functors of a vector bundle. △ Less

Submitted 1 October, 2002; originally announced October 2002.

Comments: 25 pages, 3 figures

MSC Class: 14F17

Vanishing theorems for products of exterior and symmetric powers

Authors: F. Laytimi, W. Nahm

Abstract: For ample vector bundles $E$ over compact complex varieties $X$ and a Schur functor $S_I$ corresponding to an arbitrary partition $I$ of the integer $|I|$, one would like to know the optimal vanishing theorem for the cohomology groups $H^{p,q}(X, S_I(E))$, depending on the rank of $E$ and the dimension $n$ of $X$. Three years ago (Nov. 1995), in an unpublished paper one of us (W.N.) proved a v… ▽ More For ample vector bundles $E$ over compact complex varieties $X$ and a Schur functor $S_I$ corresponding to an arbitrary partition $I$ of the integer $|I|$, one would like to know the optimal vanishing theorem for the cohomology groups $H^{p,q}(X, S_I(E))$, depending on the rank of $E$ and the dimension $n$ of $X$. Three years ago (Nov. 1995), in an unpublished paper one of us (W.N.) proved a vanishing theorem for the situation where the partition $I$ is a hook. Here we give a simpler proof of this theorem. We also treat the same problem under weaker positivity assumptions, in particular under the hypothesis of ample $Λ^m E$ with $m\in \N^*$. In this case we also need some bound on the weight $|I|$ of the partition. Moreover, we prove that the same vanishing condition applies for $H^{q,p}(X, S_I(E))$, with $p,q$ interchanged. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 1999; v1 submitted 11 September, 1998; originally announced September 1998.

Comments: The statement and the proof of Theorem 2.2 have been corrected

Report number: USTL 98-09 MSC Class: 14F17