Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Kamila, K

General Hannan and Quinn Criterion for Common Time Series

Authors: Kare Kamila

Abstract: This paper aims to study data driven model selection criteria for a large class of time series, which includes ARMA or AR($\infty$) processes, as well as GARCH or ARCH($\infty$), APARCH and many others processes. We tackled the challenging issue of designing adaptive criteria which enjoys the strong consistency property. When the observations are generated from one of the aforementioned models, th… ▽ More This paper aims to study data driven model selection criteria for a large class of time series, which includes ARMA or AR($\infty$) processes, as well as GARCH or ARCH($\infty$), APARCH and many others processes. We tackled the challenging issue of designing adaptive criteria which enjoys the strong consistency property. When the observations are generated from one of the aforementioned models, the new criteria, select the true model almost surely asymptotically. The proposed criteria are based on the minimization of a penalized contrast akin to the Hannan and Quinn's criterion and then involved a term which is known for most classical time series models and for more complex models, this term can be data driven calibrated. Monte-Carlo experiments and an illustrative example on the CAC 40 index are performed to highlight the obtained results. △ Less

Submitted 11 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Consistent model selection criteria and goodness-of-fit test for affine causal processes

Authors: Jean-Marc Bardet, Kare Kamila, William Kengne

Abstract: This paper studies the model selection problem in a large class of causal time series models, which includes both the ARMA or AR($\infty$) processes, as well as the GARCH or ARCH($\infty$), APARCH, ARMA-GARCH and many others processes. To tackle this issue, we consider a penalized contrast based on the quasi-likelihood of the model. We provide sufficient conditions for the penalty term to ensure t… ▽ More This paper studies the model selection problem in a large class of causal time series models, which includes both the ARMA or AR($\infty$) processes, as well as the GARCH or ARCH($\infty$), APARCH, ARMA-GARCH and many others processes. To tackle this issue, we consider a penalized contrast based on the quasi-likelihood of the model. We provide sufficient conditions for the penalty term to ensure the consistency of the proposed procedure as well as the consistency and the asymptotic normality of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of the chosen model. It appears from these conditions that the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) does not always guarantee the consistency. We also propose a tool for diagnosing the goodness-of-fit of the chosen model based on the portmanteau Test. Numerical simulations and an illustrative example on the FTSE index are performed to highlight the obtained asymptotic results, including a numerical evidence of the non consistency of the usual BIC penalty for order selection of an AR(p) models with ARCH($\infty$) errors. △ Less

Submitted 23 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.