Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Ischi, B

Searching in archive math. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:1109.1658  [pdf, ps, other

    math.LO

    Orthocomplemented weak tensor products

    Authors: Boris Ischi

    Abstract: Let L_1 and L_2 be complete atomistic lattices. In a previous paper, we have defined a set S=S(L_1,L_2) of complete atomistic lattices, the elements of which are called weak tensor products of L_1 and L_2. S is defined by means of three axioms, natural regarding the description of some compound systems in quantum logic. It has been proved that S is a complete lattice. The top element of S, denoted… ▽ More

    Submitted 8 September, 2011; originally announced September 2011.

    Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:math/0304350

    MSC Class: 06C15; 81P10; 06B23

    Journal ref: Algebra Universalis, vol. 64, p. 379-396 (2010)

  2. arXiv:math/0406348  [pdf, ps, other

    math.CT

    The Chu construction for complete atomistic coatomistic lattices

    Authors: Boris Ischi, Gavin J. Seal

    Abstract: The Chu construction is used to define a *-autonomous structure on a category of complete atomistic coatomistic lattices. This construction leads to a new tensor product that is compared with a certain number of other existing tensor products.

    Submitted 8 September, 2011; v1 submitted 17 June, 2004; originally announced June 2004.

    Comments: To appear in the Houston Journal of Mathematics

    MSC Class: 06B23; 18D15

  3. arXiv:math/0304350  [pdf, ps, other

    math.LO math-ph quant-ph

    Weak tensor products of complete atomistic lattices

    Authors: Boris Ischi

    Abstract: Given two complete atomistic lattices L_1 and L_2, we define a set S(L_1,L_2) of complete atomistic lattices by means of three axioms (natural regarding the description of separated quantum compound systems), or in terms of a universal property with respect to a given class of bimorphisms. We call the elements of S(L_1,L_2) weak tensor products of L_1 and L_2. We prove that S(L_1,L_2) is a complet… ▽ More

    Submitted 7 September, 2011; v1 submitted 23 April, 2003; originally announced April 2003.

    MSC Class: 06B23; 06C15; 81P10

    Journal ref: Published in Algebra Universalis, vol. 57, p. 239-258 (2007)