Generalized Measures of Population Synchrony
Authors:
Francis C. Motta,
Kevin McGoff,
Breschine Cummins,
Steven B. Haase
Abstract:
Synchronized behavior among individuals is a ubiquitous feature of populations. Understanding mechanisms of (de)synchronization demands meaningful, interpretable, computable quantifications of synchrony, relevant to measurements that can be made of dynamic populations. Despite the importance to analyzing and modeling populations, existing notions of synchrony often lack rigorous definitions, may b…
▽ More
Synchronized behavior among individuals is a ubiquitous feature of populations. Understanding mechanisms of (de)synchronization demands meaningful, interpretable, computable quantifications of synchrony, relevant to measurements that can be made of dynamic populations. Despite the importance to analyzing and modeling populations, existing notions of synchrony often lack rigorous definitions, may be specialized to a particular experimental system and/or measurement, or may have undesirable properties that limit their utility. We introduce a notion of synchrony for populations of individuals occupying a compact metric space that depends on the Fréchet variance of the distribution of individuals. We establish several fundamental and desirable mathematical properties of this synchrony measure, including continuity and invariance to metric scaling. We establish a general approximation result that controls the disparity between synchrony in the true space and the synchrony observed through a discretization of state space, as may occur when observable states are limited by measurement constraints. We develop efficient algorithms to compute synchrony in a variety of state spaces, including all finite state spaces and empirical distributions on the circle, and provide accessible implementations in an open-source Python module. To demonstrate the usefulness of the synchrony measure in biological applications, we investigate several biologically relevant models of mechanisms that can alter the dynamics of synchrony over time, and reanalyze published data concerning the dynamics of the intraerythrocytic developmental cycles of $\textit{Plasmodium}$ parasites. We anticipate that the rigorous definition of population synchrony and the mathematical and biological results presented here will be broadly useful in analyzing and modeling populations in a variety of contexts.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
A yeast cell cycle pulse generator model shows consistency with multiple oscillatory and checkpoint mutant datasets
Authors:
Julian Fox,
Breschine Cummins,
Robert C. Moseley,
Marcio Gameiro,
Steven B. Haase
Abstract:
The regulatory mechanisms driving progression of the yeast cell cycle appears to be comprised of an interacting network of transcription factors (TFs), cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and ubiquitin ligases. From a systems perspective the controlling regulatory network must produce robust periodic behavior during proliferative phases, but have the capability to halt the cycle when unfavorable condit…
▽ More
The regulatory mechanisms driving progression of the yeast cell cycle appears to be comprised of an interacting network of transcription factors (TFs), cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and ubiquitin ligases. From a systems perspective the controlling regulatory network must produce robust periodic behavior during proliferative phases, but have the capability to halt the cycle when unfavorable conditions trigger a checkpoint arrest. How the individual components of the network contribute to these dynamical phenotypes remains an open question. Here we evaluate the capability of a simplified network model hypothesized to contain key elements of the regulation of cell-cycle progression to reproduce observed transcriptomic behaviors. We match time-series data from both cycling and checkpoint arrested cells to the predictions of a relatively simple cell-cycle network model using an asynchronous multi-level Boolean approach. We show that this single network model, despite its simplicity, is capable of exhibiting dynamical behavior similar to the datasets in most cases, and where it does not, we identified hypotheses that suggest missing components of the network.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
