Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Grudzinska, J

Continuation semantics for multi-quantifier sentences: operation-based approaches

Authors: Justyna Grudzinska, Marek Zawadowski

Abstract: Classical scope-assignment strategies for multi-quantifier sentences involve quantifier phrase (QP)-movement. More recent continuation-based approaches provide a compelling alternative, for they interpret QP's in situ - without resorting to Logical Forms or any structures beyond the overt syntax. The continuation-based strategies can be divided into two groups: those that locate the source of scop… ▽ More Classical scope-assignment strategies for multi-quantifier sentences involve quantifier phrase (QP)-movement. More recent continuation-based approaches provide a compelling alternative, for they interpret QP's in situ - without resorting to Logical Forms or any structures beyond the overt syntax. The continuation-based strategies can be divided into two groups: those that locate the source of scope-ambiguity in the rules of semantic composition and those that attribute it to the lexical entries for the quantifier words. In this paper, we focus on the former operation-based approaches and the nature of the semantic operations involved. More specifically, we discuss three such possible operation-based strategies for multi-quantifier sentences, together with their relative merits and costs. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2016; v1 submitted 31 July, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: 19 pages, corrections in the table on page 3. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1605.03981

MSC Class: 03B65; 91F20

Scope ambiguities, monads and strengths

Authors: Justyna Grudzinska, Marek Zawadowski

Abstract: In this paper, we will discuss three semantically distinct scope assignment strategies: traditional movement strategy, polyadic approach, and continuation-based approach. As a generalized quantifier on a set X is an element of C(X), the value of continuation monad C on X, in all three approaches QPs are interpreted as C-computations. The main goal of this paper is to relate the three strategies to… ▽ More In this paper, we will discuss three semantically distinct scope assignment strategies: traditional movement strategy, polyadic approach, and continuation-based approach. As a generalized quantifier on a set X is an element of C(X), the value of continuation monad C on X, in all three approaches QPs are interpreted as C-computations. The main goal of this paper is to relate the three strategies to the computational machinery connected to the monad C (strength and derived operations). As will be shown, both the polyadic approach and the continuation-based approach make heavy use of monad constructs. In the traditional movement strategy, monad constructs are not used but we still need them to explain how the three strategies are related and what can be expected of them wrt handling scopal ambiguities in simple sentences. △ Less

Submitted 31 July, 2016; v1 submitted 12 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: 47 pages, small corrections

Generalized Quantifiers on Dependent Types: A System for Anaphora

Authors: Justyna Grudzinska, Marek Zawadowski

Abstract: We propose a system for the interpretation of anaphoric relationships between unbound pronouns and quantifiers. The main technical contribution of our proposal consists in combining generalized quantifiers with dependent types. Empirically, our system allows a uniform treatment of all types of unbound anaphora, including the notoriously difficult cases such as quantificational subordination, cumul… ▽ More We propose a system for the interpretation of anaphoric relationships between unbound pronouns and quantifiers. The main technical contribution of our proposal consists in combining generalized quantifiers with dependent types. Empirically, our system allows a uniform treatment of all types of unbound anaphora, including the notoriously difficult cases such as quantificational subordination, cumulative and branching continuations, and 'donkey anaphora'. △ Less

Submitted 31 July, 2016; v1 submitted 31 January, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: 40 pages; final version

MSC Class: 03B65; 91F20