Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Graßhoff, U

$ D $-optimal designs for Poisson regression with synergetic interaction effect

Authors: Fritjof Freise, Ulrike Graßhoff, Frank Röttger, Rainer Schwabe

Abstract: We characterize $D$-optimal designs in the two-dimensional Poisson regression model with synergetic interaction and provide an explicit proof. The proof is based on the idea of reparameterization of the design region in terms of contours of constant intensity. This approach leads to a substantial reduction of complexity as properties of the sensitivity can be treated along and across the contours… ▽ More We characterize $D$-optimal designs in the two-dimensional Poisson regression model with synergetic interaction and provide an explicit proof. The proof is based on the idea of reparameterization of the design region in terms of contours of constant intensity. This approach leads to a substantial reduction of complexity as properties of the sensitivity can be treated along and across the contours separately. Furthermore, some extensions of this result to higher dimensions are presented. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: 21 pages, 6 figures

MSC Class: 62K05 (Primary); 62J12 (Secondary)

Journal ref: TEST (2021)

Optimal Design for Probit Choice Models with Dependent Utilities

Authors: Ulrike Graßhoff, Heiko Großmann, Heinz Holling, Rainer Schwabe

Abstract: In this paper we derive locally D-optimal designs for discrete choice experiments based on multinomial probit models. These models include several discrete explanatory variables as well as a quantitative one. The commonly used multinomial logit model assumes independent utilities for different choice options. Thus, D-optimal optimal designs for such multinomial logit models may comprise choice set… ▽ More In this paper we derive locally D-optimal designs for discrete choice experiments based on multinomial probit models. These models include several discrete explanatory variables as well as a quantitative one. The commonly used multinomial logit model assumes independent utilities for different choice options. Thus, D-optimal optimal designs for such multinomial logit models may comprise choice sets, e.g., consisting of alternatives which are identical in all discrete attributes but different in the quantitative variable. Obviously such designs are not appropriate for many empirical choice experiments. It will be shown that locally D-optimal designs for multinomial probit models supposing independent utilities consist of counterintuitive choice sets as well. However, locally D-optimal designs for multinomial probit models allowing for dependent utilities turn out to be reasonable for analyzing decisions using discrete choice studies. △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

MSC Class: 62K05; 62J12; 62P15

Journal ref: Statistics, Volume 55, 2021, Issue 1, Pages 173-194

Optimality regions for designs in multiple linear regression models with correlated random coefficients

Authors: Ulrike Graßhoff, Heinz Holling, Frank Röttger, Rainer Schwabe

Abstract: This paper studies optimal designs for linear regression models with correlated effects for single responses. We introduce the concept of rhombic design to reduce the computational complexity and find a semi-algebraic description for the D-optimality of a rhombic design via the Kiefer-Wolfowitz equivalence theorem. Subsequently, we show that the structure of an optimal rhombic design depends direc… ▽ More This paper studies optimal designs for linear regression models with correlated effects for single responses. We introduce the concept of rhombic design to reduce the computational complexity and find a semi-algebraic description for the D-optimality of a rhombic design via the Kiefer-Wolfowitz equivalence theorem. Subsequently, we show that the structure of an optimal rhombic design depends directly on the correlation structure of the random coefficients. △ Less

Submitted 13 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: 16 pages, 7 figures

MSC Class: 62K05 (Primary); 62J05 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (2020)