-
Jointly Exchangeable Collective Risk Models: Interaction, Structure, and Limit Theorems
Authors:
Daniel Gaigall,
Stefan Weber
Abstract:
We introduce a framework for systemic risk modeling in insurance portfolios using jointly exchangeable arrays, extending classical collective risk models to account for interactions. We establish central limit theorems that asymptotically characterize total portfolio losses, providing a theoretical foundation for approximations in large portfolios and over long time horizons. These approximations…
▽ More
We introduce a framework for systemic risk modeling in insurance portfolios using jointly exchangeable arrays, extending classical collective risk models to account for interactions. We establish central limit theorems that asymptotically characterize total portfolio losses, providing a theoretical foundation for approximations in large portfolios and over long time horizons. These approximations are validated through simulation-based numerical experiments. Additionally, we analyze the impact of dependence on portfolio loss distributions, with a particular focus on tail behavior.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Testing marginal homogeneity in Hilbert spaces with applications to stock market returns
Authors:
Marc Ditzhaus,
Daniel Gaigall
Abstract:
The paper considers a paired data framework and discuss the question of marginal homogeneity of bivariate high dimensional or functional data. The related testing problem can be endowed into a more general setting for paired random variables taking values in a general Hilbert space. To address this problem, a Cramer-von-Mises type test statistic is applied and a bootstrap procedure is suggested to…
▽ More
The paper considers a paired data framework and discuss the question of marginal homogeneity of bivariate high dimensional or functional data. The related testing problem can be endowed into a more general setting for paired random variables taking values in a general Hilbert space. To address this problem, a Cramer-von-Mises type test statistic is applied and a bootstrap procedure is suggested to obtain critical values and finally a consistent test. The desired properties of a bootstrap test can be derived, that are asymptotic exactness under the null hypothesis and consistency under alternatives. Simulations show the quality of the test in the finite sample case. A possible application is the comparison of two possibly dependent stock market returns on the basis of functional data. The approach is demonstrated on the basis of historical data for different stock market indices.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2021; v1 submitted 8 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Testing hypotheses about mixture distributions using not identically distributed data
Authors:
Daniel Gaigall
Abstract:
Testing hypotheses of goodness-of-fit about mixture distributions on the basis of independent but not necessarily identically distributed random vectors is considered. The hypotheses are given by a specific distribution or by a family of distributions. Moreover, testing hypotheses formulated by Hadamard differentiable functionals is discussed in this situation, in particular the hypothesis of cent…
▽ More
Testing hypotheses of goodness-of-fit about mixture distributions on the basis of independent but not necessarily identically distributed random vectors is considered. The hypotheses are given by a specific distribution or by a family of distributions. Moreover, testing hypotheses formulated by Hadamard differentiable functionals is discussed in this situation, in particular the hypothesis of central symmetry, homogeneity and independence. Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Cramér-von-Mises type statistics are suggested as well as methods to determine critical values. The focus of the investigation is on asymptotic properties of the test statistics. Further, outcomes of simulations for finite sample sizes are given. Applications to models with not identically distributed errors are presented. The results imply that the tests are of asymptotically exact size and consistent.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2016; v1 submitted 20 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
