-
Solving The Vehicle Routing Problem via Quantum Support Vector Machines
Authors:
Nishikanta Mohanty,
Bikash K. Behera,
Christopher Ferrie
Abstract:
The Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) is an example of a combinatorial optimization problem that has attracted academic attention due to its potential use in various contexts. VRP aims to arrange vehicle deliveries to several sites in the most efficient and economical manner possible. Quantum machine learning offers a new way to obtain solutions by harnessing the natural speedups of quantum effects, a…
▽ More
The Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) is an example of a combinatorial optimization problem that has attracted academic attention due to its potential use in various contexts. VRP aims to arrange vehicle deliveries to several sites in the most efficient and economical manner possible. Quantum machine learning offers a new way to obtain solutions by harnessing the natural speedups of quantum effects, although many solutions and methodologies are modified using classical tools to provide excellent approximations of the VRP. In this paper, we implement and test hybrid quantum machine learning methods for solving VRP of 3 and 4-city scenarios, which use 6 and 12 qubit circuits, respectively. The proposed method is based on quantum support vector machines (QSVMs) with a variational quantum eigensolver on a fixed or variable ansatz. Different encoding strategies are used in the experiment to transform the VRP formulation into a QSVM and solve it. Multiple optimizers from the IBM Qiskit framework are also evaluated and compared.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Quantum Geometric Machine Learning for Quantum Circuits and Control
Authors:
Elija Perrier,
Christopher Ferrie,
Dacheng Tao
Abstract:
The application of machine learning techniques to solve problems in quantum control together with established geometric methods for solving optimisation problems leads naturally to an exploration of how machine learning approaches can be used to enhance geometric approaches to solving problems in quantum information processing. In this work, we review and extend the application of deep learning to…
▽ More
The application of machine learning techniques to solve problems in quantum control together with established geometric methods for solving optimisation problems leads naturally to an exploration of how machine learning approaches can be used to enhance geometric approaches to solving problems in quantum information processing. In this work, we review and extend the application of deep learning to quantum geometric control problems. Specifically, we demonstrate enhancements in time-optimal control in the context of quantum circuit synthesis problems by applying novel deep learning algorithms in order to approximate geodesics (and thus minimal circuits) along Lie group manifolds relevant to low-dimensional multi-qubit systems, such as SU(2), SU(4) and SU(8). We demonstrate the superior performance of greybox models, which combine traditional blackbox algorithms with prior domain knowledge of quantum mechanics, as means of learning underlying quantum circuit distributions of interest. Our results demonstrate how geometric control techniques can be used to both (a) verify the extent to which geometrically synthesised quantum circuits lie along geodesic, and thus time-optimal, routes and (b) synthesise those circuits. Our results are of interest to researchers in quantum control and quantum information theory seeking to combine machine learning and geometric techniques for time-optimal control problems.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2020; v1 submitted 19 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Maximum likelihood quantum state tomography is inadmissible
Authors:
Christopher Ferrie,
Robin Blume-Kohout
Abstract:
Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) is the most common approach to quantum state tomography. In this letter, we investigate whether it is also optimal in any sense. We show that MLE is an inadmissible estimator for most of the commonly used metrics of accuracy, i.e., some other estimator is more accurate for every true state. MLE is inadmissible for fidelity, mean squared error (squared Hilbert-Sc…
▽ More
Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) is the most common approach to quantum state tomography. In this letter, we investigate whether it is also optimal in any sense. We show that MLE is an inadmissible estimator for most of the commonly used metrics of accuracy, i.e., some other estimator is more accurate for every true state. MLE is inadmissible for fidelity, mean squared error (squared Hilbert-Schmidt distance), and relative entropy. We prove that almost any estimator that can report both pure states and mixed states is inadmissible. This includes MLE, compressed sensing (nuclear-norm regularized) estimators, and constrained least squares. We provide simple examples to illustrate why reporting pure states is suboptimal even when the true state is itself pure, and why "hedging" away from pure states generically improves performance.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
Bayes estimator for multinomial parameters and Bhattacharyya distances
Authors:
Christopher Ferrie,
Robin Blume-Kohout
Abstract:
We derive the Bayes estimator for the parameters of a multinomial distribution under two loss functions ($1-B$ and $1-B^2$) that are based on the Bhattacharyya coefficient $B(\vec{p},\vec{q}) = \sum{\sqrt{p_kq_k}}$. We formulate a non-commutative generalization relevant to quantum probability theory as an open problem. As an example application, we use our solution to find minimax estimators for a…
▽ More
We derive the Bayes estimator for the parameters of a multinomial distribution under two loss functions ($1-B$ and $1-B^2$) that are based on the Bhattacharyya coefficient $B(\vec{p},\vec{q}) = \sum{\sqrt{p_kq_k}}$. We formulate a non-commutative generalization relevant to quantum probability theory as an open problem. As an example application, we use our solution to find minimax estimators for a binomial parameter under Bhattacharyya loss ($1-B^2$).
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
Minimax quantum tomography: the ultimate bounds on accuracy
Authors:
Christopher Ferrie,
Robin Blume-Kohout
Abstract:
A minimax estimator has the minimum possible error ("risk") in the worst case. We construct the first minimax estimators for quantum state tomography with relative entropy risk. The minimax risk of non-adaptive tomography scales as $O(1/\sqrt{N})$, in contrast to that of classical probability estimation which is $O(1/N)$. We trace this deficiency to sampling mismatch: future observations that dete…
▽ More
A minimax estimator has the minimum possible error ("risk") in the worst case. We construct the first minimax estimators for quantum state tomography with relative entropy risk. The minimax risk of non-adaptive tomography scales as $O(1/\sqrt{N})$, in contrast to that of classical probability estimation which is $O(1/N)$. We trace this deficiency to sampling mismatch: future observations that determine risk may come from a different sample space than the past data that determine the estimate. This makes minimax estimators very biased, and we propose a computationally tractable alternative with similar behavior in the worst case, but superior accuracy on most states.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Near-optimal quantum tomography: estimators and bounds
Authors:
Richard Kueng,
Christopher Ferrie
Abstract:
We give bounds on the average fidelity achievable by any quantum state estimator, which is arguably the most prominently used figure of merit in quantum state tomography. Moreover, these bounds can be computed online---that is, while the experiment is running. We show numerically that these bounds are quite tight for relevant distributions of density matrices. We also show that the Bayesian mean e…
▽ More
We give bounds on the average fidelity achievable by any quantum state estimator, which is arguably the most prominently used figure of merit in quantum state tomography. Moreover, these bounds can be computed online---that is, while the experiment is running. We show numerically that these bounds are quite tight for relevant distributions of density matrices. We also show that the Bayesian mean estimator is ideal in the sense of performing close to the bound without requiring optimization. Our results hold for all finite dimensional quantum systems.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2015; v1 submitted 2 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Estimating the bias of a noisy coin
Authors:
Christopher Ferrie,
Robin Blume-Kohout
Abstract:
Optimal estimation of a coin's bias using noisy data is surprisingly different from the same problem with noiseless data. We study this problem using entropy risk to quantify estimators' accuracy. We generalize the "add Beta" estimators that work well for noiseless coins, and we find that these hedged maximum-likelihood (HML) estimators achieve a worst-case risk of O(N^{-1/2}) on noisy coins, in c…
▽ More
Optimal estimation of a coin's bias using noisy data is surprisingly different from the same problem with noiseless data. We study this problem using entropy risk to quantify estimators' accuracy. We generalize the "add Beta" estimators that work well for noiseless coins, and we find that these hedged maximum-likelihood (HML) estimators achieve a worst-case risk of O(N^{-1/2}) on noisy coins, in contrast to O(1/N) in the noiseless case. We demonstrate that this increased risk is unavoidable and intrinsic to noisy coins, by constructing minimax estimators (numerically). However, minimax estimators introduce extreme bias in return for slight improvements in the worst-case risk. So we introduce a pointwise lower bound on the minimum achievable risk as an alternative to the minimax criterion, and use this bound to show that HML estimators are pretty good. We conclude with a survey of scientific applications of the noisy coin model in social science, physical science, and quantum information science.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2012;
originally announced January 2012.
-
Adaptive Hamiltonian Estimation Using Bayesian Experimental Design
Authors:
Christopher Ferrie,
Christopher E. Granade,
D. G. Cory
Abstract:
Using Bayesian experimental design techniques, we have shown that for a single two-level quantum mechanical system under strong (projective) measurement, the dynamical parameters of a model Hamiltonian can be estimated with exponentially improved accuracy over offline estimation strategies. To achieve this, we derive an adaptive protocol which finds the optimal experiments based on previous observ…
▽ More
Using Bayesian experimental design techniques, we have shown that for a single two-level quantum mechanical system under strong (projective) measurement, the dynamical parameters of a model Hamiltonian can be estimated with exponentially improved accuracy over offline estimation strategies. To achieve this, we derive an adaptive protocol which finds the optimal experiments based on previous observations. We show that the risk associated with this algorithm is close to the global optimum, given a uniform prior. Additionally, we show that sampling at the Nyquist rate is not optimal.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2011;
originally announced November 2011.
-
How to best sample a periodic probability distribution, or on the accuracy of Hamiltonian finding strategies
Authors:
Christopher Ferrie,
Christopher E. Granade,
D. G. Cory
Abstract:
Projective measurements of a single two-level quantum mechanical system (a qubit) evolving under a time-independent Hamiltonian produce a probability distribution that is periodic in the evolution time. The period of this distribution is an important parameter in the Hamiltonian. Here, we explore how to design experiments so as to minimize error in the estimation of this parameter. While it has be…
▽ More
Projective measurements of a single two-level quantum mechanical system (a qubit) evolving under a time-independent Hamiltonian produce a probability distribution that is periodic in the evolution time. The period of this distribution is an important parameter in the Hamiltonian. Here, we explore how to design experiments so as to minimize error in the estimation of this parameter. While it has been shown that useful results may be obtained by minimizing the risk incurred by each experiment, such an approach is computationally intractable in general. Here, we motivate and derive heuristic strategies for experiment design that enjoy the same exponential scaling as fully optimized strategies. We then discuss generalizations to the case of finite relaxation times, T_2 < \infty.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2012; v1 submitted 13 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
