Coalescing random walks and voting on connected graphs
Authors:
Colin Cooper,
Robert Elsasser,
Hirotaka Ono,
Tomasz Radzik
Abstract:
In a coalescing random walk, a set of particles make independent random walks on a graph. Whenever one or more particles meet at a vertex, they unite to form a single particle, which then continues the random walk through the graph. Coalescing random walks can be used to achieve consensus in distributed networks, and is the basis of the self-stabilizing mutual exclusion algorithm of Israeli and Ja…
▽ More
In a coalescing random walk, a set of particles make independent random walks on a graph. Whenever one or more particles meet at a vertex, they unite to form a single particle, which then continues the random walk through the graph. Coalescing random walks can be used to achieve consensus in distributed networks, and is the basis of the self-stabilizing mutual exclusion algorithm of Israeli and Jalfon.
Let G=(V,E), be an undirected, connected n vertex graph with m edges. Let C(n) be the expected time for all particles to coalesce, when initially one particle is located at each vertex of an n vertex graph.
We study the problem of bounding the coalescence time C(n) for general classes of graphs. Our main result is that C(n)= O(1/(1-lambda_2))*((log n)^4 +n/A)), where lambda_2 is the absolute value of the second largest eigenvalue of the transition matrix of the random walk, A= (sum d^2(v))/(d^2 n), d(v) is the degree of vertex v, and d is the average node degree. The parameter A is an indicator of the variability of node degrees. Thus 1 <= A =O(n), with A=1 for regular graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 25 December, 2016; v1 submitted 17 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
Cover Time and Broadcast Time
Authors:
Robert Elsässer,
Thomas Sauerwald
Abstract:
We introduce a new technique for bounding the cover time of random walks by relating it to the runtime of randomized broadcast. In particular, we strongly confirm for dense graphs the intuition of Chandra et al. \cite{CRRST97} that "the cover time of the graph is an appropriate metric for the performance of certain kinds of randomized broadcast algorithms". In more detail, our results are as fol…
▽ More
We introduce a new technique for bounding the cover time of random walks by relating it to the runtime of randomized broadcast. In particular, we strongly confirm for dense graphs the intuition of Chandra et al. \cite{CRRST97} that "the cover time of the graph is an appropriate metric for the performance of certain kinds of randomized broadcast algorithms". In more detail, our results are as follows: For any graph $G=(V,E)$ of size $n$ and minimum degree $δ$, we have $\mathcal{R}(G)= \Oh(\frac{|E|}δ \cdot \log n)$, where $\mathcal{R}(G)$ denotes the quotient of the cover time and broadcast time. This bound is tight for binary trees and tight up to logarithmic factors for many graphs including hypercubes, expanders and lollipop graphs. For any $δ$-regular (or almost $δ$-regular) graph $G$ it holds that $\mathcal{R}(G) = Ω(\frac{δ^2}{n} \cdot \frac{1}{\log n})$. Together with our upper bound on $\mathcal{R}(G)$, this lower bound strongly confirms the intuition of Chandra et al. for graphs with minimum degree $Θ(n)$, since then the cover time equals the broadcast time multiplied by $n$ (neglecting logarithmic factors). Conversely, for any $δ$ we construct almost $δ$-regular graphs that satisfy $\mathcal{R}(G) = \Oh(\max \{\sqrt{n},δ\} \cdot \log^2 n)$. Since any regular expander satisfies $\mathcal{R}(G) = Θ(n)$, the strong relationship given above does not hold if $δ$ is polynomially smaller than $n$. Our bounds also demonstrate that the relationship between cover time and broadcast time is much stronger than the known relationships between any of them and the mixing time (or the closely related spectral gap).
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2009;
originally announced February 2009.
