-
Statistical Monitoring of the Covariance Matrix in Multivariate Processes: A Literature Review
Authors:
Mohsen Ebadi,
Shoja'eddin Chenouri,
Dennis K. J. Lin,
Stefan H. Steiner
Abstract:
Monitoring several correlated quality characteristics of a process is common in modern manufacturing and service industries. Although a lot of attention has been paid to monitoring the multivariate process mean, not many control charts are available for monitoring the covariance matrix. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the literature on control charts for monitoring the covariance m…
▽ More
Monitoring several correlated quality characteristics of a process is common in modern manufacturing and service industries. Although a lot of attention has been paid to monitoring the multivariate process mean, not many control charts are available for monitoring the covariance matrix. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the literature on control charts for monitoring the covariance matrix in a multivariate statistical process monitoring (MSPM) framework. It classifies the research that has previously appeared in the literature. We highlight the challenging areas for research and provide some directions for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2021; v1 submitted 14 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Remarks on Bayesian Control Charts
Authors:
Amir Ahmadi-Javid,
Mohsen Ebadi
Abstract:
There is a considerable amount of ongoing research on the use of Bayesian control charts for detecting a shift from a good quality distribution to a bad quality distribution in univariate and multivariate processes. It is widely claimed that Bayesian control charts are economically optimal; see, for example, Calabrese (1995) [Bayesian process control for attributes. Management Science, DOI: 10.128…
▽ More
There is a considerable amount of ongoing research on the use of Bayesian control charts for detecting a shift from a good quality distribution to a bad quality distribution in univariate and multivariate processes. It is widely claimed that Bayesian control charts are economically optimal; see, for example, Calabrese (1995) [Bayesian process control for attributes. Management Science, DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.41.4.637] and Makis (2008) [Multivariate Bayesian control chart. Operations Research, DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0495]. Some researchers also generalize the optimality of controls defined based on posterior probabilities to the class of partially observable Markov decision processes. This note points out that the existing Bayesian control charts cannot generally be optimal because many years ago an analytical counterexample was provided by Taylor (1965) [Markovian sequential replacement processes. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177699796].
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2017; v1 submitted 7 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Economic Design of Memory-Type Control Charts: The Fallacy of the Formula Proposed by Lorenzen and Vance (1986)
Authors:
Amir Ahmadi-Javid,
Mohsen Ebadi
Abstract:
The memory-type control charts, such as EWMA and CUSUM, are powerful tools for detecting small quality changes in univariate and multivariate processes. Many papers on economic design of these control charts use the formula proposed by Lorenzen and Vance (1986) [Lorenzen, T. J., & Vance, L. C. (1986). The economic design of control charts: A unified approach. Technometrics, 28(1), 3-10, DOI: 10.23…
▽ More
The memory-type control charts, such as EWMA and CUSUM, are powerful tools for detecting small quality changes in univariate and multivariate processes. Many papers on economic design of these control charts use the formula proposed by Lorenzen and Vance (1986) [Lorenzen, T. J., & Vance, L. C. (1986). The economic design of control charts: A unified approach. Technometrics, 28(1), 3-10, DOI: 10.2307/1269598]. This paper shows that this formula is not correct for memory-type control charts and its values can significantly deviate from the original values even if the ARL values used in this formula are accurately computed. Consequently, the use of this formula can result in charts that are not economically optimal. The formula is corrected for memory-type control charts, but unfortunately the modified formula is not a helpful tool from a computational perspective. We show that simulation-based optimization is a possible alternative method.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
