-
Hidden variables, free choice, context-independence, and all that
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
This paper provides a systematic account of the hidden variable models (HVMs) formulated to describe systems of random variables with mutually exclusive contexts. Any such system can be described either by a model with free choice but generally context-dependent mapping of the hidden variables into observable ones, or by a model with context-independent mapping but generally compromised free choic…
▽ More
This paper provides a systematic account of the hidden variable models (HVMs) formulated to describe systems of random variables with mutually exclusive contexts. Any such system can be described either by a model with free choice but generally context-dependent mapping of the hidden variables into observable ones, or by a model with context-independent mapping but generally compromised free choice. These two types of HVMs are equivalent, one can always be translated into another. They are also unfalsifiable, applicable to all possible systems. These facts, the equivalence and unfalsifiability, imply that freedom of choice and context-independent mapping are no assumptions at all, and they tell us nothing about freedom of choice or physical influences exerted by contexts as these notions would be understood in science and philosophy. The conjunction of these two notions, however, defines a falsifiable HVM that describes noncontextuality when applied to systems with no disturbance or to consistifications of arbitrary systems. This HVM is most adequately captured by the term "context-irrelevance," meaning that no distribution in the model changes with context.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2023; v1 submitted 25 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Contextuality and Informational Redundancy
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
A noncontextual system of random variables may become contextual if one adds to it a set of new variables, even if each of them is obtained by the same context-wise function of the old variables. This fact follows from the definition of contextuality, and its demonstration is trivial for inconsistently connected systems (i.e. systems with disturbance). However, it also holds for consistently conne…
▽ More
A noncontextual system of random variables may become contextual if one adds to it a set of new variables, even if each of them is obtained by the same context-wise function of the old variables. This fact follows from the definition of contextuality, and its demonstration is trivial for inconsistently connected systems (i.e. systems with disturbance). However, it also holds for consistently connected (and even strongly consistently connected) systems, provided one acknowledges that if a given property was not measured in a given context, this information can be used in defining functions among the random variables. Moreover, every inconsistently connected system can be presented as a (strongly) consistently connected system with essentially the same contextuality characteristics.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2022; v1 submitted 6 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Context-independent mapping and free choice are equivalent
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
Free choice (or statistical independence) assumption in a hidden variable model (HVM) means that the settings chosen by experimenters do not depend on the values of the hidden variable. The assumption of context-independent (CI) mapping in an HVM means that the results of a measurement do not depend on settings for other measurements. If the measurements are spacelike separated, this assumption is…
▽ More
Free choice (or statistical independence) assumption in a hidden variable model (HVM) means that the settings chosen by experimenters do not depend on the values of the hidden variable. The assumption of context-independent (CI) mapping in an HVM means that the results of a measurement do not depend on settings for other measurements. If the measurements are spacelike separated, this assumption is known as local causality. Both free choice and CI mapping assumptions are considered necessary for derivation of the Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality. It is known, however, for a variety of special cases, that the two assumptions are not logically independent. We show here, in complete generality, for any system of random variables with or without disturbance/signaling, that an HVM that postulates CI mapping is equivalent to an HVM that postulates free choice. If one denies the possibility that a given empirical scenario can be described by an HVM in which measurements depend on other measurements' settings, free choice violations should be denied too, and vice versa.
KEYWORDS: Contextuality; context-independent mapping; free choice; local causality; nonlocality.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2022; v1 submitted 29 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Assumption-free derivation of the Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality can be derived without any falsifiable assumptions, such as context-independent mapping (or local causality), free choice, or no-fine-tuning. This is achieved by deriving Bell-type criteria for inconsistently connected systems (i.e., those with disturbance/signaling), based on the generalized definition of contextuality in the Contextuality-by-Defaul…
▽ More
Bell-type criteria of contextuality/nonlocality can be derived without any falsifiable assumptions, such as context-independent mapping (or local causality), free choice, or no-fine-tuning. This is achieved by deriving Bell-type criteria for inconsistently connected systems (i.e., those with disturbance/signaling), based on the generalized definition of contextuality in the Contextuality-by-Default approach, and then specializing these criteria to consistently connected systems.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2021; v1 submitted 11 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Fechnerian Scaling: Dissimilarity Cumulation Theory
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Hans Colonius
Abstract:
This is a chapter for the third volume of the New Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. It presented mathematical foundations of Fechnerian Scaling, a method of metrizing stimulus spaces based on subjective measures of dissimilarity.
This is a chapter for the third volume of the New Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. It presented mathematical foundations of Fechnerian Scaling, a method of metrizing stimulus spaces based on subjective measures of dissimilarity.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Contextuality and dichotomizations of random variables
Authors:
Janne V. Kujala,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
The Contextuality-by-Default approach to determining and measuring the (non)contextuality of a system of random variables requires that every random variable in the system be represented by an equivalent set of dichotomous random variables. In this paper we present general principles that justify the use of dichotomizations and determine their choice. The main idea in choosing dichotomizations is…
▽ More
The Contextuality-by-Default approach to determining and measuring the (non)contextuality of a system of random variables requires that every random variable in the system be represented by an equivalent set of dichotomous random variables. In this paper we present general principles that justify the use of dichotomizations and determine their choice. The main idea in choosing dichotomizations is that if the set of possible values of a random variable is endowed with a pre-topology (V-space), then the allowable dichotomizations split the space of possible values into two linked subsets ("linkednes" being a weak form of pre-topological connectedness). We primarily focus on two types of random variables most often encountered in practice: categorical and real-valued ones (including continuous random variables, greatly underrepresented in the contextuality literature). A categorical variable (one with a finite number of unordered values) is represented by all of its possible dichotomizations. If the values of a random variable are real numbers, then they are dichotomized by intervals above and below a variable cut point.
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2021; v1 submitted 8 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Contents, Contexts, and Basics of Contextuality
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
This is a non-technical introduction into theory of contextuality. More precisely, it presents the basics of a theory of contextuality called Contextuality-by-Default (CbD). One of the main tenets of CbD is that the identity of a random variable is determined not only by its content (that which is measured or responded to) but also by contexts, systematically recorded conditions under which the va…
▽ More
This is a non-technical introduction into theory of contextuality. More precisely, it presents the basics of a theory of contextuality called Contextuality-by-Default (CbD). One of the main tenets of CbD is that the identity of a random variable is determined not only by its content (that which is measured or responded to) but also by contexts, systematically recorded conditions under which the variable is observed; and the variables in different contexts possess no joint distributions. I explain why this principle has no paradoxical consequences, and why it does not support the holistic "everything depends on everything else" view. Contextuality is defined as the difference between two differences: (1) the difference between content-sharing random variables when taken in isolation, and (2) the difference between the same random variables when taken within their contexts. Contextuality thus defined is a special form of context-dependence rather than a synonym for the latter. The theory applies to any empirical situation describable in terms of random variables. Deterministic situations are trivially noncontextual in CbD, but some of them can be described by systems of epistemic random variables, in which random variability is replaced with epistemic uncertainty. Mathematically, such systems are treated as if they were ordinary systems of random variables.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2022; v1 submitted 14 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Contextuality Analysis of Impossible Figures
Authors:
Víctor H. Cervantes,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
This paper has two purposes. One is to demonstrate contextuality analysis of systems of epistemic random variables. The other is to evaluate the performance of a new, hierarchical version of the measure of (non)contextuality introduced in earlier publications. As objects of analysis we use impossible figures of the kind created by the Penroses and Escher. We make no assumptions as to how an imposs…
▽ More
This paper has two purposes. One is to demonstrate contextuality analysis of systems of epistemic random variables. The other is to evaluate the performance of a new, hierarchical version of the measure of (non)contextuality introduced in earlier publications. As objects of analysis we use impossible figures of the kind created by the Penroses and Escher. We make no assumptions as to how an impossible figure is perceived, taking it instead as a fixed physical object allowing one of several deterministic descriptions. Systems of epistemic random variables are obtained by probabilistically mixing these deterministic systems. This probabilistic mixture reflects our uncertainty or lack of knowledge rather than random variability in the frequentist sense.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2020; v1 submitted 5 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Systems of random variables and the Free Will Theorem
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
The title refers to the Free Will Theorem by Conway and Kochen whose flashy formulation is: if experimenters possess free will, then so do particles. In more modest terms, the theorem says that individual pairs of spacelike separated particles cannot be described by deterministic systems provided their mixture is the same for all choices of measurement settings. We reformulate and generalize the F…
▽ More
The title refers to the Free Will Theorem by Conway and Kochen whose flashy formulation is: if experimenters possess free will, then so do particles. In more modest terms, the theorem says that individual pairs of spacelike separated particles cannot be described by deterministic systems provided their mixture is the same for all choices of measurement settings. We reformulate and generalize the Free Will Theorem theorem in terms of systems of random variables, and show that the proof is based on two observations: (1) some compound systems are contextual (non-local), and (2) any deterministic system with spacelike separated components is non-signaling. The contradiction between the two is obtained by showing that a mixture of non-signaling deterministic systems, if they exist, is always noncontextual. The "experimenters' free will" (independence) assumption is not needed for the proof: it is made redundant by the assumption (1) above, critical for the proof. We next argue that the reason why an individual pair of particles is not described by a deterministic system is more elementary than in the Free Will Theorem. A system, contextual or not and deterministic or not, includes several choices of settings, each of which can be factually used without changing the system. An individual pair of particles can only afford a single realization of random variables for a single choice of settings. With this conceptualization, the "free will of experimenters" cannot be even meaningfully formulated, and the choice between the determinism and "free will of particles" becomes arbitrary and inconsequential.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2020; v1 submitted 26 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
On contextuality and logic in scientific discourse: Reply to Aliakbarzadeh, Kitto, and Bruza
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
Aliakbarzadeh, Kitto, and Bruza (arXiv:1909.13048v1) criticize the Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory in three ways: (1) they claim an internal contradiction within the theory, that consists in both denying and accepting the equality of stochastically unrelated random variables; (2) they find CbD deficient because when one confines one's attention to consistently connected systems (those with n…
▽ More
Aliakbarzadeh, Kitto, and Bruza (arXiv:1909.13048v1) criticize the Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory in three ways: (1) they claim an internal contradiction within the theory, that consists in both denying and accepting the equality of stochastically unrelated random variables; (2) they find CbD deficient because when one confines one's attention to consistently connected systems (those with no disturbance/signaling) one can dispense with the double-indexation of random variables; and (3) they see no relationship between double-indexation and ontic states. This commentary shows that (re$\:$1) the contradiction is inserted in the presentation of CbD by the authors of the paper; (re$\:$2) in the case of consistently connected systems CbD properly specializes to traditional understanding of contextuality; and (re$\:$3) if ontic states are understood as quantum states, they are simply not within the language of CbD, and if they are understood as domain probability spaces for context-sharing random variables, they can be trivially reconstructed.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Contextuality and Noncontextuality Measures and Generalized Bell Inequalities for Cyclic Systems
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala,
Víctor H. Cervantes
Abstract:
Cyclic systems of dichotomous random variables have played a prominent role in contextuality research, describing such experimental paradigms as the Klyachko-Can-Binicoglu-Shumovky, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bell, and Leggett-Garg ones in physics, as well as conjoint binary choices in human decision making. Here, we understand contextuality within the framework of the Contextuality-by-Default (CbD)…
▽ More
Cyclic systems of dichotomous random variables have played a prominent role in contextuality research, describing such experimental paradigms as the Klyachko-Can-Binicoglu-Shumovky, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bell, and Leggett-Garg ones in physics, as well as conjoint binary choices in human decision making. Here, we understand contextuality within the framework of the Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory, based on the notion of probabilistic couplings satisfying certain constraints. CbD allows us to drop the commonly made assumption that systems of random variables are consistently connected. Consistently connected systems constitute a special case in which CbD essentially reduces to the conventional understanding of contextuality. We present a theoretical analysis of the degree of contextuality in cyclic systems (if they are contextual) and the degree of noncontextuality in them (if they are not). By contrast, all previously proposed measures of contextuality are confined to consistently connected systems, and most of them cannot be extended to measures of noncontextuality. Our measures of (non)contextuality are defined by the L_{1}-distance between a point representing a cyclic system and the surface of the polytope representing all possible noncontextual cyclic systems with the same single-variable marginals. We completely characterize this polytope, as well as the polytope of all possible probabilistic couplings for cyclic systems with given single-variable marginals.[...]
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2021; v1 submitted 7 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
The Contextuality-by-Default View of the Sheaf-Theoretic Approach to Contextuality
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
The Sheaf-Theoretic Contextuality (STC) theory developed by Abramsky and colleagues is a very general account of whether multiply overlapping subsets of a set, each of which is endowed with certain "local'" structure, can be viewed as inheriting this structure from a global structure imposed on the entire set. A fundamental requirement of STC is that any intersection of subsets inherit one and the…
▽ More
The Sheaf-Theoretic Contextuality (STC) theory developed by Abramsky and colleagues is a very general account of whether multiply overlapping subsets of a set, each of which is endowed with certain "local'" structure, can be viewed as inheriting this structure from a global structure imposed on the entire set. A fundamental requirement of STC is that any intersection of subsets inherit one and the same structure from all intersecting subsets. I show that when STC is applied to systems of random variables, it can be recast in the language of the Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory, and this allows one to extend STC to arbitrary systems, in which the requirement in question (called "consistent connectedness'" in CbD) is not necessarily satisfied. When applied to deterministic systems, such as systems of logical statements with fixed truth values, a problem arises of distinguishing lack of consistent connectedness from contextuality. I show that it can be resolved by considering systems with multiple possible deterministic realizations as quasi-probabilistic systems with Bayesian priors assigned to the realizations. Although STC and CbD have distinct native languages and distinct aims and means, the conceptual modifications presented in this paper seem to make them essentially coextensive.
△ Less
Submitted 8 April, 2023; v1 submitted 6 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Measures of Contextuality and Noncontextuality
Authors:
Janne V. Kujala,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
We discuss three measures of the degree of contextuality in contextual systems of dichotomous random variables. These measures are developed within the framework of the Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory, and apply to inconsistently connected systems (those with "disturbance" allowed). For one of these measures of contextuality, presented here for the first time, we construct a corresponding me…
▽ More
We discuss three measures of the degree of contextuality in contextual systems of dichotomous random variables. These measures are developed within the framework of the Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory, and apply to inconsistently connected systems (those with "disturbance" allowed). For one of these measures of contextuality, presented here for the first time, we construct a corresponding measure of the degree of noncontextuality in noncontextual systems. The other two CbD-based measures do not suggest ways in which degree of noncontextuality of a noncontextual system can be quantified. We find the same to be true for the contextual fraction measure developed by Abramsky, Barbosa, and Mansfield. This measure of contextuality is confined to consistently connected systems, but CbD allows one to generalize it to arbitrary systems.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2019; v1 submitted 17 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
On Universality of Classical Probability with Contextually Labeled Random Variables: Response to A. Khrennikov
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Maria Kon
Abstract:
In his constructive and well-informed commentary, Andrei Khrennikov acknowledges a privileged status of classical probability theory with respect to statistical analysis. He also sees advantages offered by the Contextuality-by-Default theory, notably, that it `demystifies quantum mechanics by highlighting the role of contextuality,' and that it can detect and measure contextuality in inconsistentl…
▽ More
In his constructive and well-informed commentary, Andrei Khrennikov acknowledges a privileged status of classical probability theory with respect to statistical analysis. He also sees advantages offered by the Contextuality-by-Default theory, notably, that it `demystifies quantum mechanics by highlighting the role of contextuality,' and that it can detect and measure contextuality in inconsistently connected systems. He argues, however, that classical probability theory may have difficulties in describing empirical phenomena if they are described entirely in terms of observable events. We disagree: contexts in which random variables are recorded are as observable as the variables' values. Khrennikov also argues that the Contextuality-by-Default theory suffers the problem of non-uniqueness of couplings. We disagree that this is a problem: couplings are all possible ways of imposing counterfactual joint distributions on random variables that de facto are not jointly distributed. The uniqueness of modeling experiments by means of quantum formalisms brought up by Khrennikov is achieved for the price of additional, substantive assumptions. This is consistent with our view of quantum theory as a special-purpose generator of classical probabilities. Khrennikov raises the issue of `mental signaling,' by which he means inconsistent connectedness in behavioral systems. Our position is that it is as inherent to behavioral systems as their stochasticity.
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2018; v1 submitted 3 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
True Contextuality in a Psychophysical Experiment
Authors:
Victor H. Cervantes,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
Recent crowdsourcing experiments have shown that true contextuality of the kind found in quantum mechanics can also be present in human behavior. In these experiments simple human choices were aggregated over large numbers of respondents, with each respondent dealing with a single context (set of questions asked). In this paper we present experimental evidence of contextuality in individual human…
▽ More
Recent crowdsourcing experiments have shown that true contextuality of the kind found in quantum mechanics can also be present in human behavior. In these experiments simple human choices were aggregated over large numbers of respondents, with each respondent dealing with a single context (set of questions asked). In this paper we present experimental evidence of contextuality in individual human behavior, in a psychophysical experiment with repeated presentations of visual stimuli in randomly varying contexts (arrangements of stimuli). The analysis is based on the Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory whose relevant aspects are reviewed in the paper. CbD allows one to detect contextuality in the presence of direct influences, i.e., when responses to the same stimuli have different distributions in different contexts. The experiment presented is also the first one in which contextuality is demonstrated for responses that are not dichotomous, with five options to choose among. CbD requires that random variables representing such responses be dichotomized before they are subjected to contextuality analysis. A theorem says that a system consisting of all possible dichotomizations of responses has to be contextual if these responses violate a certain condition, called nominal dominance. In our experiment nominal dominance was violated in all data sets, with very high statistical reliability established by bootstrapping.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2019; v1 submitted 30 November, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Quantum Mechanics with Contextually Labeled Observables
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
In the Contextuality-by-Default theory random variables representing measurement outcomes are labeled contextually, i.e., not only by what they measure but also under what conditions (in what contexts) the measurements are made, including but not reducible to what other measurements are made "together" with the given one. We propose in this paper that the quantum observables generating these rando…
▽ More
In the Contextuality-by-Default theory random variables representing measurement outcomes are labeled contextually, i.e., not only by what they measure but also under what conditions (in what contexts) the measurements are made, including but not reducible to what other measurements are made "together" with the given one. We propose in this paper that the quantum observables generating these random variables be labeled contextually as well, making the sets of the observables in different contexts disjoint. A quantum observable is defined as a pair consisting of the observable's label and a self-adjoint operator in a Hilbert space. If a system is consistently connected (i.e., obeys "non-disturbance," "non-invasivenes," or "non-signaling" conditions), the observables measuring the same property in different contexts have the same operator. A set of random variables possessing a joint distribution is represented by commuting observables. The reverse, however, is not true: random variables from different contexts do not have a joint distribution irrespective of whether the corresponding observables commute. We illustrate this view of observables by deriving the Tsirelson bound for consistently connected cyclic systems of rank 3.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 23 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Contextuality Analysis of the Double Slit Experiment (With a Glimpse Into Three Slits)
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
The Contextuality-by-Default theory is illustrated on contextuality analysis of the idealized double-slit experiment. The experiment is described by a system of contextually labeled binary random variables each of which answers the question: has the particle hit the detector, having passed through a given slit (left or right) in a given state (open or closed)? This system of random variables is a…
▽ More
The Contextuality-by-Default theory is illustrated on contextuality analysis of the idealized double-slit experiment. The experiment is described by a system of contextually labeled binary random variables each of which answers the question: has the particle hit the detector, having passed through a given slit (left or right) in a given state (open or closed)? This system of random variables is a cyclic system of rank 4, formally the same as the system describing the EPR/Bell paradigm with signaling. Unlike the latter, however, the system describing the double-slit experiment is always noncontextual, i.e., the context-dependence in it is entirely explainable in terms of direct influences of contexts (closed-open arrangements of the slits) upon the marginal distributions of the random variables involved. The analysis presented is entirely within the framework of abstract classical probability theory (with contextually labeled random variables). The only physical constraint used in the analysis is that a particle cannot pass through a closed slit. The noncontextuality of the double-slit system does not generalize to systems describing experiments with more than two slits: in an abstract triple-slit system, almost any set of observable detection probabilities is compatible with both a contextual scenario and a noncontextual scenario of the particle passing though various combinations of open and closed slits (although the issue of physical realizability of these scenarios remains open).
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2018; v1 submitted 31 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Snow Queen is Evil and Beautiful: Experimental Evidence for Probabilistic Contextuality in Human Choices
Authors:
Victor H. Cervantes,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
We present unambiguous experimental evidence for (quantum-like) probabilistic contextuality in psychology. All previous attempts to find contextuality in a psychological experiment were unsuccessful because of the gross violations of marginal selectivity in behavioral data, making the traditional mathematical tests developed in quantum mechanics inapplicable. In our crowdsourcing experiment respon…
▽ More
We present unambiguous experimental evidence for (quantum-like) probabilistic contextuality in psychology. All previous attempts to find contextuality in a psychological experiment were unsuccessful because of the gross violations of marginal selectivity in behavioral data, making the traditional mathematical tests developed in quantum mechanics inapplicable. In our crowdsourcing experiment respondents were making two simple choices: of one of two characters in a story (The Snow Queen by Hans Christian Andersen), and of one of two characteristics, such as Kind and Evil, so that the character and the characteristic chosen matched the story line. The formal structure of the experiment imitated that of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradigm in the Bohm-Bell version. Marginal selectivity was violated, indicating that the two choices were directly influencing each other, but the application of a mathematical test developed in the Contextuality-by-Default theory, extending the traditional quantum-mechanical test, indicated a strong presence of contextuality proper, not reducible to direct influences.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2018; v1 submitted 1 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
On Universality of Classical Probability with Contextually Labeled Random Variables
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Maria Kon
Abstract:
One can often encounter claims that classical (Kolmogorovian) probability theory cannot handle, or even is contradicted by, certain empirical findings or substantive theories. This note joins several previous attempts to explain that these claims are unjustified, illustrating this on the issues of (non)existence of joint distributions, probabilities of ordered events, and additivity of probabiliti…
▽ More
One can often encounter claims that classical (Kolmogorovian) probability theory cannot handle, or even is contradicted by, certain empirical findings or substantive theories. This note joins several previous attempts to explain that these claims are unjustified, illustrating this on the issues of (non)existence of joint distributions, probabilities of ordered events, and additivity of probabilities. The specific focus of this note is on showing that the mistakes underlying these claims can be precluded by labeling all random variables involved contextually. Moreover, contextual labeling also enables a valuable additional way of analyzing probabilistic aspects of empirical situations: determining whether the random variables involved form a contextual system, in the sense generalized from quantum mechanics. Thus, to the extent the Wang-Busemeyer QQ equality for the question order effect holds, the system describing them is noncontextual. The double-slit experiment and its behavioral analogues also turn out to form a noncontextual system, having the same probabilistic format (cyclic system of rank 4) as the one describing spins of two entangled electrons.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2018; v1 submitted 21 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Replacing Nothing with Something Special: Contextuality-by-Default and Dummy Measurements
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
The object of contextuality analysis is a set of random variables each of which is uniquely labeled by a content and a context. In the measurement terminology, the content is that which the random variable measures, whereas the context describes the conditions under which this content is measured (in particular, the set of other contents being measured "together" with this one). Such a set of rand…
▽ More
The object of contextuality analysis is a set of random variables each of which is uniquely labeled by a content and a context. In the measurement terminology, the content is that which the random variable measures, whereas the context describes the conditions under which this content is measured (in particular, the set of other contents being measured "together" with this one). Such a set of random variables is deemed noncontextual or contextual depending on whether the distributions of the context-sharing random variables are or are not compatible with certain distributions imposed on the content-sharing random variables. In the traditional approaches, contextuality is either restricted to only consistently-connected systems (those in which any two content-sharing random variables have the same distribution) or else all inconsistently-connected systems (those not having this property) are considered contextual. In the Contextuality-by-Default theory, an inconsistently connected system may or may not be contextual. There are several arguments for this understanding of contextuality, and this note adds one more. It is related to the fact that generally not each content is measured in each context, so there are "empty" content-context pairs. It is convenient to treat each of these empty pairs as containing a dummy random variable, one that does not change the degree of contextuality in a system. These dummy random variables are deterministic ones, attaining a single value with probability 1. The replacement of absent random variables with deterministic ones, however, can only be made if one allows for inconsistently-connected systems.
KEYWORDS: contextuality, dummy measurements, inconsistent connectedness, random variables.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2017; v1 submitted 14 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
Contextuality in Canonical Systems of Random Variables
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Víctor H. Cervantes,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
Random variables representing measurements, broadly understood to include any responses to any inputs, form a system in which each of them is uniquely identified by its content (that which it measures) and its context (the conditions under which it is recorded). Two random variables are jointly distributed if and only if they share a context. In a canonical representation of a system, all random v…
▽ More
Random variables representing measurements, broadly understood to include any responses to any inputs, form a system in which each of them is uniquely identified by its content (that which it measures) and its context (the conditions under which it is recorded). Two random variables are jointly distributed if and only if they share a context. In a canonical representation of a system, all random variables are binary, and every content-sharing pair of random variables has a unique maximal coupling (the joint distribution imposed on them so that they coincide with maximal possible probability). The system is contextual if these maximal couplings are incompatible with the joint distributions of the context-sharing random variables. We propose to represent any system of measurements in a canonical form and to consider the system contextual if and only if its canonical representation is contextual. As an illustration, we establish a criterion for contextuality of the canonical system consisting of all dichotomizations of a single pair of content-sharing categorical random variables.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2017; v1 submitted 3 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
Advanced Analysis of Quantum Contextuality in a Psychophysical Double-Detection Experiment
Authors:
Víctor H. Cervantes,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
The results of behavioral experiments typically exhibit inconsistent connectedness, i.e., they violate the condition known as "no-signaling," "no-disturbance," or "marginal selectivity." This prevents one from evaluating these experiments in terms of quantum contextuality if the latter understood traditionally (as, e.g., in the Kochen-Specker theorem or Bell-type inequalities). The Contextuality-b…
▽ More
The results of behavioral experiments typically exhibit inconsistent connectedness, i.e., they violate the condition known as "no-signaling," "no-disturbance," or "marginal selectivity." This prevents one from evaluating these experiments in terms of quantum contextuality if the latter understood traditionally (as, e.g., in the Kochen-Specker theorem or Bell-type inequalities). The Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory separates contextuality from inconsistent connectedness. When applied to quantum physical experiments that exhibit inconsistent connectedness (due to context-dependent errors and/or signaling), the CbD computations reveal quantum contextuality in spite of this. When applied to a large body of published behavioral experiments, the CbD computations reveal no quantum contextuality: all context-dependence in these experiments is described by inconsistent connectedness alone. Until recently, however, experimental analysis of contextuality was confined to so-called cyclic systems of binary random variables. Here, we present the results of a psychophysical double-detection experiment that do not form a cyclic system: their analysis requires that we use a recent modification of CbD, one that makes the class of noncontextual systems more restricted. Nevertheless our results once again indicate that when inconsistent connectedness is taken into account, the system exhibits no contextuality. KEYWORDS: contextuality, cyclic systems, double-detection, inconsistent connectedness, psychophysics.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2017; v1 submitted 13 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Exploration of Contextuality in a Psychophysical Double-Detection Experiment
Authors:
Victor H. Cervantes,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
The Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory allows one to separate contextuality from context-dependent errors and violations of selective influences (aka "no-signaling" or "no-disturbance" principles). This makes the theory especially applicable to behavioral systems, where violations of selective influences are ubiquitous. For cyclic systems with binary random variables, CbD provides necessary and…
▽ More
The Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory allows one to separate contextuality from context-dependent errors and violations of selective influences (aka "no-signaling" or "no-disturbance" principles). This makes the theory especially applicable to behavioral systems, where violations of selective influences are ubiquitous. For cyclic systems with binary random variables, CbD provides necessary and sufficient conditions for noncontextuality, and these conditions are known to be breached in certain quantum systems. We apply the theory of cyclic systems to a psychophysical double-detection experiment, in which observers were asked to determine presence or absence of a signal property in each of two simultaneously presented stimuli. The results, as in all other behavioral and social systems previous analyzed, indicate lack of contextuality. The role of context in double-detection is confined to lack of selectiveness: the distribution of responses to one of the stimuli is influenced by the state of the other stimulus.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2016; v1 submitted 16 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Contextuality-by-Default 2.0: Systems with Binary Random Variables
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
The paper outlines a new development in the Contextuality-by-Default theory as applied to finite systems of binary random variables. The logic and principles of the original theory remain unchanged, but the definition of contextuality of a system of random variables is now based on multimaximal rather than maximal couplings of the variables that measure the same property in different contexts: a s…
▽ More
The paper outlines a new development in the Contextuality-by-Default theory as applied to finite systems of binary random variables. The logic and principles of the original theory remain unchanged, but the definition of contextuality of a system of random variables is now based on multimaximal rather than maximal couplings of the variables that measure the same property in different contexts: a system is considered noncontextual if these multimaximal couplings are compatible with the distributions of the random variables sharing contexts. A multimaximal coupling is one that is a maximal coupling of any subset (equivalently, of any pair) of the random variables being coupled. Arguments are presented for why this modified theory is a superior generalization of the traditional understanding of contextuality in quantum mechanics. The modified theory coincides with the previous version in the important case of cyclic systems, which include the systems whose contextuality was most intensively studied in quantum physics and behavioral sciences.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2016; v1 submitted 16 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Context-Content Systems of Random Variables: The Contextuality-by-Default Theory
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
This paper provides a systematic yet accessible presentation of the Contextuality-by-Default theory. The consideration is confined to finite systems of categorical random variables, which allows us to focus on the basics of the theory without using full-scale measure-theoretic language. Contextuality-by-Default is a theory of random variables identified by their contents and their contexts, so tha…
▽ More
This paper provides a systematic yet accessible presentation of the Contextuality-by-Default theory. The consideration is confined to finite systems of categorical random variables, which allows us to focus on the basics of the theory without using full-scale measure-theoretic language. Contextuality-by-Default is a theory of random variables identified by their contents and their contexts, so that two variables have a joint distribution if and only if they share a context. Intuitively, the content of a random variable is the entity the random variable measures or responds to, while the context is formed by the conditions under which these measurements or responses are obtained. A system of random variables consists of stochastically unrelated "bunches," each of which is a set of jointly distributed random variables sharing a context. The variables that have the same content in different contexts form "connections" between the bunches. A probabilistic coupling of this system is a set of random variables obtained by imposing a joint distribution on the stochastically unrelated bunches. A system is considered noncontextual or contextual according to whether it can or cannot be coupled so that the joint distributions imposed on its connections possess a certain property (in the present version of the theory, "maximality"). We present a criterion of contextuality for a special class of systems of random variables, called cyclic systems. We also introduce a general measure of contextuality that makes use of (quasi-)couplings whose distributions may involve negative numbers or numbers greater than 1 in place of probabilities.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2016; v1 submitted 11 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
-
Conversations on Contextuality
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
In the form of a dialogue (imitating in style Lakatos's Proof and Refutation), this chapter presents and explains the main points of the approach to contextuality dubbed Contextuality-by-Default.
In the form of a dialogue (imitating in style Lakatos's Proof and Refutation), this chapter presents and explains the main points of the approach to contextuality dubbed Contextuality-by-Default.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2015; v1 submitted 3 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Contextuality-by-Default: A Brief Overview of Ideas, Concepts, and Terminology
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala,
Victor H. Cervantes
Abstract:
This paper is a brief overview of the concepts involved in measuring the degree of contextuality and detecting contextuality in systems of binary measurements of a finite number of objects. We discuss and clarify the main concepts and terminology of the theory called "contextuality-by-default," and then discuss a possible generalization of the theory from binary to arbitrary measurements.
This paper is a brief overview of the concepts involved in measuring the degree of contextuality and detecting contextuality in systems of binary measurements of a finite number of objects. We discuss and clarify the main concepts and terminology of the theory called "contextuality-by-default," and then discuss a possible generalization of the theory from binary to arbitrary measurements.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2015; v1 submitted 2 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
-
Proof of a Conjecture on Contextuality in Cyclic Systems with Binary Variables
Authors:
Janne V. Kujala,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
We present a proof for a conjecture previously formulated by Dzhafarov, Kujala, and Larsson (Foundations of Physics, in press, arXiv:1411.2244). The conjecture specifies a measure for the degree of contextuality and a criterion (necessary and sufficient condition) for contextuality in a broad class of quantum systems. This class includes Leggett-Garg, EPR/Bell, and Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsk…
▽ More
We present a proof for a conjecture previously formulated by Dzhafarov, Kujala, and Larsson (Foundations of Physics, in press, arXiv:1411.2244). The conjecture specifies a measure for the degree of contextuality and a criterion (necessary and sufficient condition) for contextuality in a broad class of quantum systems. This class includes Leggett-Garg, EPR/Bell, and Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky type systems as special cases. In a system of this class certain physical properties $q_{1},...,q_{n}$ are measured in pairs $(q_{i},q_{j})$; every property enters in precisely two such pairs; and each measurement outcome is a binary random variable. Denoting the measurement outcomes for a property $q_{i}$ in the two pairs it enters by $V_{i}$ and $W_{i}$, the pair of measurement outcomes for $(q_{i},q_{j})$ is $(V_{i},W_{j})$. Contextuality is defined as follows: one computes the minimal possible value $Δ_{0}$ for the sum of $\Pr[V_{i}\not=W_{i}]$ (over $i=1,...,n$) that is allowed by the individual distributions of $V_{i}$ and $W_{i}$; one computes the minimal possible value $Δ_{\min}$ for the sum of $\Pr[V_{i}\not=W_{i}]$ across all possible couplings of (i.e., joint distributions imposed on) the entire set of random variables $V_{1},W_{1},...,V_{n},W_{n}$ in the system; and the system is considered contextual if $Δ_{\min}>Δ_{0}$ (otherwise $Δ_{\min}=Δ_{0}$). This definition has its justification in the general approach dubbed Contextuality-by-Default, and it allows for measurement errors and signaling among the measured properties. The conjecture proved in this paper specifies the value of $Δ_{\min}-Δ_{0}$ in terms of the distributions of the measurement outcomes $(V_{i},W_{j})$.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2019; v1 submitted 7 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Classificatory Sorites, Probabilistic Supervenience, and Rule-Making
Authors:
Damir D. Dzhafarov,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
We view sorites in terms of stimuli acting upon a system and evoking this system's responses. Supervenience of responses on stimuli implies that they either lack tolerance (i.e., they change in every vicinity of some of the stimuli), or stimuli are not always connectable by finite chains of stimuli in which successive members are `very similar'. If supervenience does not hold, the properties of to…
▽ More
We view sorites in terms of stimuli acting upon a system and evoking this system's responses. Supervenience of responses on stimuli implies that they either lack tolerance (i.e., they change in every vicinity of some of the stimuli), or stimuli are not always connectable by finite chains of stimuli in which successive members are `very similar'. If supervenience does not hold, the properties of tolerance and connectedness cannot be formulated and therefore soritical sequences cannot be constructed. We hypothesize that supervenience in empirical systems (such as people answering questions) is fundamentally probabilistic. The supervenience of probabilities of responses on stimuli is stable, in the sense that `higher-order' probability distributions can always be reduced to `ordinary' ones. In making rules about which stimuli ought to correspond to which responses, the main characterization of choices in soritical situations is their arbitrariness. We argue that arbitrariness poses no problems for classical logic.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2015; v1 submitted 3 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
-
Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems
Authors:
Janne V. Kujala,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Jan-Åke Larsson
Abstract:
The notion of (non)contextuality pertains to sets of properties measured one subset (context) at a time. We extend this notion to include so-called inconsistently connected systems, in which the measurements of a given property in different contexts may have different distributions, due to contextual biases in experimental design or physical interactions (signaling): a system of measurements has a…
▽ More
The notion of (non)contextuality pertains to sets of properties measured one subset (context) at a time. We extend this notion to include so-called inconsistently connected systems, in which the measurements of a given property in different contexts may have different distributions, due to contextual biases in experimental design or physical interactions (signaling): a system of measurements has a maximally noncontextual description if they can be imposed a joint distribution on in which the measurements of any one property in different contexts are equal to each other with the maximal probability allowed by their different distributions. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of such a description in a broad class of systems including Klyachko-Can-Binicioğlu-Shumvosky-type (KCBS), EPR-Bell-type, and Leggett-Garg-type systems. Because these conditions allow for inconsistent connectedness, they are applicable to real experiments. We illustrate this by analyzing an experiment by Lapkiewicz and colleagues aimed at testing contextuality in a KCBS-type system.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2015; v1 submitted 15 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala,
Jan-Åke Larsson
Abstract:
We present a formal theory of contextuality for a set of random variables grouped into different subsets (contexts) corresponding to different, mutually incompatible conditions. Within each context the random variables are jointly distributed, but across different contexts they are stochastically unrelated. The theory of contextuality is based on the analysis of the extent to which some of these r…
▽ More
We present a formal theory of contextuality for a set of random variables grouped into different subsets (contexts) corresponding to different, mutually incompatible conditions. Within each context the random variables are jointly distributed, but across different contexts they are stochastically unrelated. The theory of contextuality is based on the analysis of the extent to which some of these random variables can be viewed as preserving their identity across different contexts when one considers all possible joint distributions imposed on the entire set of the random variables. We illustrate the theory on three systems of traditional interest in quantum physics (and also in non-physical, e.g., behavioral studies). These are systems of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky-type, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bell-type, and Suppes-Zanotti-Leggett-Garg-type. Listed in this order, each of them is formally a special case of the previous one. For each of them we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for contextuality while allowing for experimental errors and contextual biases or signaling. Based on the same principles that underly these derivations we also propose a measure for the degree of contextuality and compute it for the three systems in question.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2015; v1 submitted 9 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
Generalizing Bell-type and Leggett-Garg-type Inequalities to Systems with Signaling
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
Contextuality means non-existence of a joint distribution for random variables recorded under mutually incompatible conditions, subject to certain constraints imposed on how the identity of these variables may change across these conditions. In simple quantum systems contextuality is indicated by violations of Bell-type or Leggett-Garg-type inequalities. These inequalities, however, are predicated…
▽ More
Contextuality means non-existence of a joint distribution for random variables recorded under mutually incompatible conditions, subject to certain constraints imposed on how the identity of these variables may change across these conditions. In simple quantum systems contextuality is indicated by violations of Bell-type or Leggett-Garg-type inequalities. These inequalities, however, are predicated on the assumption of no-signaling, defined as invariance of the distributions of measurement results with respect to other (e.g., earlier in time) measurements' settings. Signaling makes the inequalities inapplicable: a non-signaling system with any degree of contextuality, however high, loses any relation to this concept as soon as it exhibits any degree of signaling, however small. This is unsatisfactory. We describe a principled way of defining and measuring contextuality in arbitrary systems with random outputs, whether signaling is absent or present.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2015; v1 submitted 10 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
Measuring Observable Quantum Contextuality
Authors:
J. Acacio de Barros,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala,
Gary Oas
Abstract:
Contextuality is a central property in comparative analysis of classical, quantum, and supercorrelated systems. We examine and compare two well-motivated approaches to contextuality. One approach ("contextuality-by-default") is based on the idea that one and the same physical property measured under different conditions (contexts) is represented by different random variables. The other approach is…
▽ More
Contextuality is a central property in comparative analysis of classical, quantum, and supercorrelated systems. We examine and compare two well-motivated approaches to contextuality. One approach ("contextuality-by-default") is based on the idea that one and the same physical property measured under different conditions (contexts) is represented by different random variables. The other approach is based on the idea that while a physical property is represented by a single random variable irrespective of its context, the joint distributions of the random variables describing the system can involve negative (quasi-)probabilities. We show that in the Leggett-Garg and EPR-Bell systems, the two measures essentially coincide.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2015; v1 submitted 11 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Probabilistic Contextuality in EPR/Bohm-type Systems with Signaling Allowed
Authors:
Janne V. Kujala,
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov
Abstract:
In this chapter, we review a principled way of defining and measuring contextuality in systems with deterministic inputs and random outputs, recently proposed and developed in \citep{KujalaDzhafarovLarsson2015,DKL2015FooP}.
In this chapter, we review a principled way of defining and measuring contextuality in systems with deterministic inputs and random outputs, recently proposed and developed in \citep{KujalaDzhafarovLarsson2015,DKL2015FooP}.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2015; v1 submitted 2 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Embedding Quantum into Classical: Contextualization vs Conditionalization
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
We compare two approaches to embedding joint distributions of random variables recorded under different conditions (such as spins of entangled particles for different settings) into the framework of classical, Kolmogorovian probability theory. In the contextualization approach each random variable is "automatically" labeled by all conditions under which it is recorded, and the random variables acr…
▽ More
We compare two approaches to embedding joint distributions of random variables recorded under different conditions (such as spins of entangled particles for different settings) into the framework of classical, Kolmogorovian probability theory. In the contextualization approach each random variable is "automatically" labeled by all conditions under which it is recorded, and the random variables across a set of mutually exclusive conditions are probabilistically coupled (imposed a joint distribution upon). Analysis of all possible probabilistic couplings for a given set of random variables allows one to characterize various relations between their separate distributions (such as Bell-type inequalities or quantum-mechanical constraints). In the conditionalization approach one considers the conditions under which the random variables are recorded as if they were values of another random variable, so that the observed distributions are interpreted as conditional ones. This approach is uninformative with respect to relations between the distributions observed under different conditions, because any set of such distributions is compatible with any distribution assigned to the conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2015; v1 submitted 30 November, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Random Variables Recorded under Mutually Exclusive Conditions: Contextuality-by-Default
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
We present general principles underlying analysis of the dependence of random variables (outputs) on deterministic conditions (inputs). Random outputs recorded under mutually exclusive input values are labeled by these values and considered stochastically unrelated, possessing no joint distribution. An input that does not directly influence an output creates a context for the latter. Any constrain…
▽ More
We present general principles underlying analysis of the dependence of random variables (outputs) on deterministic conditions (inputs). Random outputs recorded under mutually exclusive input values are labeled by these values and considered stochastically unrelated, possessing no joint distribution. An input that does not directly influence an output creates a context for the latter. Any constraint imposed on the dependence of random outputs on inputs can be characterized by considering all possible couplings (joint distributions) imposed on stochastically unrelated outputs. The target application of these principles is a quantum mechanical system of entangled particles, with directions of spin measurements chosen for each particle being inputs and the spins recorded outputs. The sphere of applicability, however, spans systems across physical, biological, and behavioral sciences.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2015; v1 submitted 4 September, 2013;
originally announced September 2013.
-
No-Forcing and No-Matching Theorems for Classical Probability Applied to Quantum Mechanics
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
Correlations of spins in a system of entangled particles are inconsistent with Kolmogorov's probability theory (KPT), provided the system is assumed to be non-contextual. In the Alice-Bob EPR paradigm, non-contextuality means that the identity of Alice's spin (i.e., the probability space on which it is defined as a random variable) is determined only by the axis \alphai chosen by Alice, irrespecti…
▽ More
Correlations of spins in a system of entangled particles are inconsistent with Kolmogorov's probability theory (KPT), provided the system is assumed to be non-contextual. In the Alice-Bob EPR paradigm, non-contextuality means that the identity of Alice's spin (i.e., the probability space on which it is defined as a random variable) is determined only by the axis \alphai chosen by Alice, irrespective of Bob's axis \betaj (and vice versa). Here, we study contextual KPT models, with two properties: (1) Alice's and Bob's spins are identified as Aij and Bij, even though their distributions are determined by, respectively, \alphai alone and \betaj alone, in accordance with the no-signaling requirement; and (2) the joint distributions of the spins Aij,Bij across all values of \alphai,\betaj are constrained by fixing distributions of some subsets thereof. Of special interest among these subsets is the set of probabilistic connections, defined as the pairs \left(Aij,Aij'\right) and \left(Bij,Bi'j\right) with \alphai\not=\alphai' and \betaj\not=\betaj' (the non-contextuality assumption is obtained as a special case of connections, with zero probabilities of Aij\not=Aij' and Bij\not=Bi'j). Thus, one can achieve a complete KPT characterization bof the Bell-type inequalities, or Tsirelson's inequalities, by specifying the distributions of probabilistic connections compatible with those and only those spin pairs \left(Aij,Bij\right) that are subject to these inequalities. We show, however, that quantum-mechanical (QM) constraints are special. No-forcing theorem says that if a set of probabilistic connections is not compatible with correlations violating QM, then it is compatible only with the classical-mechanical correlations. No-matching theorem says that there are no subsets of the spin variables Aij,Bij whose distributions can be fixed to be compatible with and only with QM-compliant correlations.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2015; v1 submitted 15 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
On selective influences, marginal selectivity, and Bell/CHSH inequalities
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
The Bell/CHSH inequalities of quantum physics are identical with the inequalities derived in mathematical psychology for the problem of selective influences in cases involving two bi- nary experimental factors and two binary random variables recorded in response to them. The following points are made regarding cognitive science applications: (1) compliance of data with these inequalities is inform…
▽ More
The Bell/CHSH inequalities of quantum physics are identical with the inequalities derived in mathematical psychology for the problem of selective influences in cases involving two bi- nary experimental factors and two binary random variables recorded in response to them. The following points are made regarding cognitive science applications: (1) compliance of data with these inequalities is informative only if the data satisfy the requirement known as marginal selectivity; (2) both violations of marginal selectivity and violations of the Bell/CHSH inequalities are interpretable as indicating that at least one of the two responses is influenced by both experimental factors.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2013; v1 submitted 10 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
-
All-Possible-Couplings Approach to Measuring Probabilistic Context
Authors:
E. N. Dzhafarov,
J. V. Kujala
Abstract:
From behavioral sciences to biology to quantum mechanics, one encounters situations where (i) a system outputs several random variables in response to several inputs, (ii) for each of these responses only some of the inputs may "directly" influence them, but (iii) other inputs provide a "context" for this response by influencing its probabilistic relations to other responses. These contextual infl…
▽ More
From behavioral sciences to biology to quantum mechanics, one encounters situations where (i) a system outputs several random variables in response to several inputs, (ii) for each of these responses only some of the inputs may "directly" influence them, but (iii) other inputs provide a "context" for this response by influencing its probabilistic relations to other responses. These contextual influences are very different, say, in classical kinetic theory and in the entanglement paradigm of quantum mechanics, which are traditionally interpreted as representing different forms of physical determinism. One can mathematically construct systems with other types of contextuality, whether or not empirically realizable: those that form special cases of the classical type, those that fall between the classical and quantum ones, and those that violate the quantum type. We show how one can quantify and classify all logically possible contextual influences by studying various sets of probabilistic couplings, i.e., sets of joint distributions imposed on random outputs recorded at different (mutually incompatible) values of inputs.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2015; v1 submitted 15 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
-
Quantum Entanglement and the Issue of Selective Influences in Psychology: An Overview
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
Similar formalisms have been independently developed in psychology, to deal with the issue of selective influences (deciding which of several experimental manipulations selectively influences each of several, generally non-independent, response variables), and in quantum mechanics (QM), to deal with the EPR entanglement phenomena (deciding whether an EPR experiment allows for a "classical" account…
▽ More
Similar formalisms have been independently developed in psychology, to deal with the issue of selective influences (deciding which of several experimental manipulations selectively influences each of several, generally non-independent, response variables), and in quantum mechanics (QM), to deal with the EPR entanglement phenomena (deciding whether an EPR experiment allows for a "classical" account). The parallels between these problems are established by observing that any two noncommuting measurements in QM are mutually exclusive and can therefore be treated as analogs of different values of one and the same input. Both problems reduce to that of the existence of a jointly distributed system of random variables, one variable for every value of every input (in psychology) or every measurement on every particle involved (in an EPR experiment). We overview three classes of necessary conditions (some of them also sufficient under additional constraints) for the existence of such joint distributions.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
-
Selectivity in Probabilistic Causality: Where Psychology Runs Into Quantum Physics
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
Given a set of several inputs into a system (e.g., independent variables characterizing stimuli) and a set of several stochastically non-independent outputs (e.g., random variables describing different aspects of responses), how can one determine, for each of the outputs, which of the inputs it is influenced by? The problem has applications ranging from modeling pairwise comparisons to reconstruct…
▽ More
Given a set of several inputs into a system (e.g., independent variables characterizing stimuli) and a set of several stochastically non-independent outputs (e.g., random variables describing different aspects of responses), how can one determine, for each of the outputs, which of the inputs it is influenced by? The problem has applications ranging from modeling pairwise comparisons to reconstructing mental processing architectures to conjoint testing. A necessary and sufficient condition for a given pattern of selective influences is provided by the Joint Distribution Criterion, according to which the problem of "what influences what" is equivalent to that of the existence of a joint distribution for a certain set of random variables. For inputs and outputs with finite sets of values this criterion translates into a test of consistency of a certain system of linear equations and inequalities (Linear Feasibility Test) which can be performed by means of linear programming. While new in the behavioral context, both this test and the Joint Distribution Criterion on which it is based have been previously proposed in quantum physics, in dealing with generalizations of Bell inequalities for the quantum entanglement problem. The parallels between this problem and that of selective influences in behavioral sciences is established by observing that noncommuting measurements in quantum physics are mutually exclusive and can therefore be treated as different levels of one and the same factor.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2012; v1 submitted 10 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
-
Order-distance and other metric-like functions on jointly distributed random variables
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
We construct a class of real-valued nonnegative binary functions on a set of jointly distributed random variables, which satisfy the triangle inequality and vanish at identical arguments (pseudo-quasi-metrics). These functions are useful in dealing with the problem of selective probabilistic causality encountered in behavioral sciences and in quantum physics. The problem reduces to that of ascerta…
▽ More
We construct a class of real-valued nonnegative binary functions on a set of jointly distributed random variables, which satisfy the triangle inequality and vanish at identical arguments (pseudo-quasi-metrics). These functions are useful in dealing with the problem of selective probabilistic causality encountered in behavioral sciences and in quantum physics. The problem reduces to that of ascertaining the existence of a joint distribution for a set of variables with known distributions of certain subsets of this set. Any violation of the triangle inequality or its consequences by one of our functions when applied to such a set rules out the existence of this joint distribution. We focus on an especially versatile and widely applicable pseudo-quasi-metric called an order-distance and its special case called a classification distance.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2012; v1 submitted 6 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
-
Selectivity in Probabilistic Causality: Drawing Arrows from Inputs to Stochastic Outputs
Authors:
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,
Janne V. Kujala
Abstract:
Given a set of several inputs into a system (e.g., independent variables characterizing stimuli) and a set of several stochastically non-independent outputs (e.g., random variables describing different aspects of responses), how can one determine, for each of the outputs, which of the inputs it is influenced by? The problem has applications ranging from modeling pairwise comparisons to reconstruct…
▽ More
Given a set of several inputs into a system (e.g., independent variables characterizing stimuli) and a set of several stochastically non-independent outputs (e.g., random variables describing different aspects of responses), how can one determine, for each of the outputs, which of the inputs it is influenced by? The problem has applications ranging from modeling pairwise comparisons to reconstructing mental processing architectures to conjoint testing. A necessary and sufficient condition for a given pattern of selective influences is provided by the Joint Distribution Criterion, according to which the problem of "what influences what" is equivalent to that of the existence of a joint distribution for a certain set of random variables. For inputs and outputs with finite sets of values this criterion translates into a test of consistency of a certain system of linear equations and inequalities (Linear Feasibility Test) which can be performed by means of linear programming. The Joint Distribution Criterion also leads to a metatheoretical principle for generating a broad class of necessary conditions (tests) for diagrams of selective influences. Among them is the class of distance-type tests based on the observation that certain functionals on jointly distributed random variables satisfy triangle inequality.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2011; v1 submitted 15 August, 2011;
originally announced August 2011.
