Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Dergacheva, N S

Forester's lattices and small non-Leighton complexes

Authors: Natalia S. Dergacheva, Anton A. Klyachko

Abstract: We construct two CW-complexes $K$ and $L$ admitting a common, but not finite common, covering, where $K$ is homeomorphic to a complex with a single 2-cell. We construct two CW-complexes $K$ and $L$ admitting a common, but not finite common, covering, where $K$ is homeomorphic to a complex with a single 2-cell. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2024; v1 submitted 9 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: 6 pages. A Russian version of this paper is at http://halgebra.math.msu.su/staff/klyachko/papers.htm . V3: details are added, an error and misprints are corrected --- thanks to an anonymous referee

Tiny non-Leighton complexes

Authors: Natalia S. Dergacheva, Anton A. Klyachko

Abstract: How complex must two finite 2-complexes be to admit a common, but not finite common, covering? We obtain an almost answer: the minimum possible number of triangles in a pseudo-simplicial triangulation of each complex is 3, 4, or 5. How complex must two finite 2-complexes be to admit a common, but not finite common, covering? We obtain an almost answer: the minimum possible number of triangles in a pseudo-simplicial triangulation of each complex is 3, 4, or 5. △ Less

Submitted 7 April, 2025; v1 submitted 14 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 5 pages. A Russian version of this paper is at http://halgebra.math.msu.su/staff/klyachko/papers.htm . V4: Minor misprint corrections

Journal ref: Geometriae Dedicata, 219:3 (2025), 48

Small non-Leighton two-complexes

Authors: Natalia S. Dergacheva, Anton A. Klyachko

Abstract: How many two-cells must two finite CW-complexes have to admit a common, but not finite common, covering? Leighton's theorem says that both complexes must have two-cells. We construct an almost (?) minimal example with two two-cells in each complex. How many two-cells must two finite CW-complexes have to admit a common, but not finite common, covering? Leighton's theorem says that both complexes must have two-cells. We construct an almost (?) minimal example with two two-cells in each complex. △ Less

Submitted 24 July, 2022; v1 submitted 3 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: 5 pages. A Russian version of this paper is at http://halgebra.math.msu.su/staff/klyachko/papers.htm . V.4: Some details were added

Journal ref: Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 174:2 (2023), 385-391