From resolvent to Gramians: extracting forcing and response modes for control
Authors:
Benjamin Herrmann,
Peter J. Baddoo,
Scott T. M. Dawson,
Richard Semaan,
Steven L. Brunton,
Beverley J. McKeon
Abstract:
During the last decade, forcing and response modes produced by resolvent analysis have demonstrated great potential to guide sensor and actuator placement and design in flow control applications. However, resolvent modes are frequency-dependent, which, although responsible for their success in identifying scale interactions in turbulence, complicates their use for control purposes. In this work, w…
▽ More
During the last decade, forcing and response modes produced by resolvent analysis have demonstrated great potential to guide sensor and actuator placement and design in flow control applications. However, resolvent modes are frequency-dependent, which, although responsible for their success in identifying scale interactions in turbulence, complicates their use for control purposes. In this work, we seek orthogonal bases of forcing and response modes that are the most responsive and receptive, respectively, across all frequencies. We show that these frequency-independent bases of \emph{representative} resolvent modes are given by the eigenvectors of the observability and controllability Gramians of the system considering full state inputs and outputs. We present several numerical examples where we leverage these bases by building orthogonal or interpolatory projectors onto the dominant forcing and response subspaces. Gramian-based forcing modes are used to identify dynamically relevant disturbances, to place point sensors to measure disturbances, and to design actuators for feedforward control in the subcritical linearized Ginzburg--Landau equation. Gramian-based response modes are used to identify coherent structures and for point sensor placement aiming at state reconstruction in the turbulent flow in a minimal channel at $\mathrm{Re}_τ=185$. The approach does not require data snapshots and relies only on knowledge of the steady or mean flow.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2023; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
Evaluating the accuracy of the dynamic mode decomposition
Authors:
Hao Zhang,
Scott T. M. Dawson,
Clarence W. Rowley,
Eric A. Deem,
Louis N. Cattafesta
Abstract:
Dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) gives a practical means of extracting dynamic information from data, in the form of spatial modes and their associated frequencies and growth/decay rates. DMD can be considered as a numerical approximation to the Koopman operator, an infinite-dimensional linear operator defined for (nonlinear) dynamical systems. This work proposes a new criterion to estimate the ac…
▽ More
Dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) gives a practical means of extracting dynamic information from data, in the form of spatial modes and their associated frequencies and growth/decay rates. DMD can be considered as a numerical approximation to the Koopman operator, an infinite-dimensional linear operator defined for (nonlinear) dynamical systems. This work proposes a new criterion to estimate the accuracy of DMD on a mode-by-mode basis, by estimating how closely each individual DMD eigenfunction approximates the corresponding Koopman eigenfunction. This approach does not require any prior knowledge of the system dynamics or the true Koopman spectral decomposition. The method may be applied to extensions of DMD (i.e., extended/kernel DMD), which are applicable to a wider range of problems. The accuracy criterion is first validated against the true error with a synthetic system for which the true Koopman spectral decomposition is known. We next demonstrate how this proposed accuracy criterion can be used to assess the performance of various choices of kernel when using the kernel method for extended DMD. Finally, we show that our proposed method successfully identifies modes of high accuracy when applying DMD to data from experiments in fluids, in particular particle image velocimetry of a cylinder wake and a canonical separated boundary layer.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
