Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Curry, C P

Irreducible Julia sets of rational functions

Authors: Clinton P. Curry

Abstract: We prove that a polynomial Julia set which is a finitely irreducible continuum is either an arc or an indecomposable continuum. For the more general case of rational functions, we give a topological model for the dynamics when the Julia set is an irreducible continuum and all indecomposable subcontinua have empty interior. We prove that a polynomial Julia set which is a finitely irreducible continuum is either an arc or an indecomposable continuum. For the more general case of rational functions, we give a topological model for the dynamics when the Julia set is an irreducible continuum and all indecomposable subcontinua have empty interior. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2010; originally announced June 2010.

Comments: 8 pages, 2 figures

MSC Class: 37F10 (Primary) 54F15 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, Volume 16, Issue 5 & 6 May 2010, pages 443 - 450

Buried Points in Julia Sets

Authors: Clinton P. Curry, John C. Mayer

Abstract: We give an introduction to buried points in Julia sets and a list of questions about buried points, written to encourage aficionados of topology and dynamics to work on these questions. We give an introduction to buried points in Julia sets and a list of questions about buried points, written to encourage aficionados of topology and dynamics to work on these questions. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2008; originally announced October 2008.

Comments: 10 pages, 2 figures

MSC Class: 37F20 (Primary); 54F15 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, Volume 16, Issue 5 & 6 May 2010 , pages 435 - 441

Recognizing indecomposable subcontinua of surfaces from their complements

Authors: Clinton P. Curry

Abstract: We prove two theorems which allow one to recognize indecomposable subcontinua of closed surfaces without boundary. If $X$ is a subcontinuum of a closed surface $S$, we call the components of $S \setminus X$ the complementary domains of $X$. We prove that a continuum is either indecomposable or the union of two indecomposable continua whenever it has a sequence of distinct complementary domains w… ▽ More We prove two theorems which allow one to recognize indecomposable subcontinua of closed surfaces without boundary. If $X$ is a subcontinuum of a closed surface $S$, we call the components of $S \setminus X$ the complementary domains of $X$. We prove that a continuum is either indecomposable or the union of two indecomposable continua whenever it has a sequence of distinct complementary domains whose boundaries limit to the continuum in the Hausdorff metric. We define a slightly stronger condition on the complementary domains of a continuum, called the double-pass condition, which we conjecture is equivalent to indecomposability of the continuum. We prove that this is so for continua which are not the boundary of one of their complementary domains. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2008; originally announced June 2008.

Comments: 14 pages

MSC Class: 54F15 (Primary); 57N05 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Topology Proc. 33 (2009), 251--268

Any counterexample to Makienko's conjecture is an indecomposable continuum

Authors: Clinton P. Curry, John C. Mayer, Jonathan Meddaugh, James T. Rogers Jr

Abstract: Makienko's conjecture, a proposed addition to Sullivan's dictionary, can be stated as follows: The Julia set of a rational function R has buried points if and only if no component of the Fatou set is completely invariant under the second iterate of R. We prove Makienko's conjecture for rational functions with Julia sets that are decomposable continua. This is a very broad collection of Julia set… ▽ More Makienko's conjecture, a proposed addition to Sullivan's dictionary, can be stated as follows: The Julia set of a rational function R has buried points if and only if no component of the Fatou set is completely invariant under the second iterate of R. We prove Makienko's conjecture for rational functions with Julia sets that are decomposable continua. This is a very broad collection of Julia sets; it is not known if there exists a rational functions whose Julia set is an indecomposable continuum. △ Less

Submitted 21 May, 2008; originally announced May 2008.

Comments: 10 pages

MSC Class: 37F20 (Primary); 54F15 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 29 (2009), no. 3, 875--883

Characterizing indecomposable plane continua from their complements

Authors: Clinton P. Curry, John C. Mayer, E. D. Tymchatyn

Abstract: We show that a plane continuum X is indecomposable iff X has a sequence (U_n) of not necessarily distinct complementary domains satisfying what we call the double-pass condition: If one draws an open arc A_n in each U_n whose ends limit into the boundary of U_n, one can choose components of U_n minus A_n whose boundaries intersected with the continuum (which we call shadows) converge to the cont… ▽ More We show that a plane continuum X is indecomposable iff X has a sequence (U_n) of not necessarily distinct complementary domains satisfying what we call the double-pass condition: If one draws an open arc A_n in each U_n whose ends limit into the boundary of U_n, one can choose components of U_n minus A_n whose boundaries intersected with the continuum (which we call shadows) converge to the continuum. △ Less

Submitted 21 May, 2008; originally announced May 2008.

Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures. To appear in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

MSC Class: 54F15 (Primary); 37F20 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. Volume 136, Number 11, November 2008, Pages 4045--4055.