Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Chekanov, Y

Lagrangian product tori in tame symplectic manifolds

Authors: Yuri Chekanov, Felix Schlenk

Abstract: Product Lagrangian tori in standard symplectic space $R^{2n}$ were classified up to symplectomorphism in [Che96]. We extend this classification to tame symplectically aspherical symplectic manifolds. We show by examples that the asphericity assumption cannot be omitted. Product Lagrangian tori in standard symplectic space $R^{2n}$ were classified up to symplectomorphism in [Che96]. We extend this classification to tame symplectically aspherical symplectic manifolds. We show by examples that the asphericity assumption cannot be omitted. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: 31 pages

Notes on monotone Lagrangian twist tori

Authors: Yuri Chekanov, Felix Schlenk

Abstract: We construct monotone Lagrangian tori in the standard symplectic vector space, in the complex projective space and in products of spheres. We explain how to classify these Lagrangian tori up to symplectomorphism and Hamiltonian isotopy, and how to show that they are not displaceable by Hamiltonian isotopies. We construct monotone Lagrangian tori in the standard symplectic vector space, in the complex projective space and in products of spheres. We explain how to classify these Lagrangian tori up to symplectomorphism and Hamiltonian isotopy, and how to show that they are not displaceable by Hamiltonian isotopies. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2010; originally announced March 2010.

Comments: 18 pages, 12 figures

Minimal atlases of closed contact manifolds

Authors: Yuri Chekanov, Otto van Koert, Felix Schlenk

Abstract: We study the minimal number C(M,ξ) of contact charts that one needs to cover a closed connected contact manifold (M,ξ). Our basic result is C(M,ξ) \le \dim M + 1. We compute C(M,ξ) for all closed connected contact 3-manifolds: C (M,ξ) = 2 if M = S^3 and ξis tight, 3 if M = S^3 and ξis overtwisted or if M = #_k (S^2 \times S^1), 4 otherwise. We also show that on every sphere S^{2n+1} th… ▽ More We study the minimal number C(M,ξ) of contact charts that one needs to cover a closed connected contact manifold (M,ξ). Our basic result is C(M,ξ) \le \dim M + 1. We compute C(M,ξ) for all closed connected contact 3-manifolds: C (M,ξ) = 2 if M = S^3 and ξis tight, 3 if M = S^3 and ξis overtwisted or if M = #_k (S^2 \times S^1), 4 otherwise. We also show that on every sphere S^{2n+1} there exists a contact structure with C(S^{2n+1},ξ) \ge 3. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2008; originally announced July 2008.

Comments: 40 pages, 18 figures

MSC Class: 53D35

Invariants of Legendrian knots

Authors: Yuri Chekanov

Abstract: We present two different constructions of invariants for Legendrian knots in the standard contact space $\R^3$. These invariants are defined combinatorially, in terms of certain planar projections, and are useful in distinguishing Legendrian knots that have the same classical invariants but are not Legendrian isotopic. We present two different constructions of invariants for Legendrian knots in the standard contact space $\R^3$. These invariants are defined combinatorially, in terms of certain planar projections, and are useful in distinguishing Legendrian knots that have the same classical invariants but are not Legendrian isotopic. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2003; originally announced April 2003.

MSC Class: 57R17

Journal ref: Proceedings of the ICM, Beijing 2002, vol. 2, 385--394

Differential algebras of Legendrian links

Authors: Yuri Chekanov

Abstract: The problem of classification of Legendrian knots (links) up to isotopy in the class of Legendrian embeddings (Legendrian isotopy) naturally leads to the following two subproblems. The first of them is: which combinations of the three classical invariants can be realized by a Legendrian knot? (It is well-known that each invariant by itself can be realized by a Legendrian knot). The first step in… ▽ More The problem of classification of Legendrian knots (links) up to isotopy in the class of Legendrian embeddings (Legendrian isotopy) naturally leads to the following two subproblems. The first of them is: which combinations of the three classical invariants can be realized by a Legendrian knot? (It is well-known that each invariant by itself can be realized by a Legendrian knot). The first step in this direction was done by Bennequin who proved that the Bennequin number of a Legendrian knot is less than twice its genus. The second subproblem is whether there exist a pair of Legendrian knots which have the same classical invariants but are not Legendrian isotopic. Eliashberg and Fraser showed that this is impossible when knots are trivial as smooth knots. In the present paper, we develop a theory which allows us, in particular, to find a counterexample to this subproblem. △ Less

Submitted 16 September, 1997; originally announced September 1997.

Report number: FI-ST1997-010