-
Surrogate-Based Optimization Techniques for Process Systems Engineering
Authors:
Mathias Neufang,
Emma Pajak,
Damien van de Berg,
Ye Seol Lee,
Ehecatl Antonio del Rio Chanona
Abstract:
Optimization plays an important role in chemical engineering, impacting cost-effectiveness, resource utilization, product quality, and process sustainability metrics. This chapter broadly focuses on data-driven optimization, particularly, on model-based derivative-free techniques, also known as surrogate-based optimization. The chapter introduces readers to the theory and practical considerations…
▽ More
Optimization plays an important role in chemical engineering, impacting cost-effectiveness, resource utilization, product quality, and process sustainability metrics. This chapter broadly focuses on data-driven optimization, particularly, on model-based derivative-free techniques, also known as surrogate-based optimization. The chapter introduces readers to the theory and practical considerations of various algorithms, complemented by a performance assessment across multiple dimensions, test functions, and two chemical engineering case studies: a stochastic high-dimensional reactor control study and a low-dimensional constrained stochastic reactor optimization study. This assessment sheds light on each algorithm's performance and suitability for diverse applications. Additionally, each algorithm is accompanied by background information, mathematical foundations, and algorithm descriptions. Among the discussed algorithms are Bayesian Optimization (BO), including state-of-the-art TuRBO, Constrained Optimization by Linear Approximation (COBYLA), the Ensemble Tree Model Optimization Tool (ENTMOOT) which uses decision trees as surrogates, Stable Noisy Optimization by Branch and Fit (SNOBFIT), methods that use radial basis functions such as DYCORS and SRBFStrategy, Constrained Optimization by Quadratic Approximations (COBYQA), as well as a few others recognized for their effectiveness in surrogate-based optimization. By combining theory with practice, this chapter equips readers with the knowledge to integrate surrogate-based optimization techniques into chemical engineering. The overarching aim is to highlight the advantages of surrogate-based optimization, introduce state-of-the-art algorithms, and provide guidance for successful implementation within process systems engineering.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Expert-guided Bayesian Optimisation for Human-in-the-loop Experimental Design of Known Systems
Authors:
Tom Savage,
Ehecatl Antonio del Rio Chanona
Abstract:
Domain experts often possess valuable physical insights that are overlooked in fully automated decision-making processes such as Bayesian optimisation. In this article we apply high-throughput (batch) Bayesian optimisation alongside anthropological decision theory to enable domain experts to influence the selection of optimal experiments. Our methodology exploits the hypothesis that humans are bet…
▽ More
Domain experts often possess valuable physical insights that are overlooked in fully automated decision-making processes such as Bayesian optimisation. In this article we apply high-throughput (batch) Bayesian optimisation alongside anthropological decision theory to enable domain experts to influence the selection of optimal experiments. Our methodology exploits the hypothesis that humans are better at making discrete choices than continuous ones and enables experts to influence critical early decisions. At each iteration we solve an augmented multi-objective optimisation problem across a number of alternate solutions, maximising both the sum of their utility function values and the determinant of their covariance matrix, equivalent to their total variability. By taking the solution at the knee point of the Pareto front, we return a set of alternate solutions at each iteration that have both high utility values and are reasonably distinct, from which the expert selects one for evaluation. We demonstrate that even in the case of an uninformed practitioner, our algorithm recovers the regret of standard Bayesian optimisation.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Multi-Fidelity Data-Driven Design and Analysis of Reactor and Tube Simulations
Authors:
Tom Savage,
Nausheen Basha,
Jonathan McDonough,
Omar K Matar,
Ehecatl Antonio del Rio Chanona
Abstract:
The development of new manufacturing techniques such as 3D printing have enabled the creation of previously infeasible chemical reactor designs. Systematically optimizing the highly parameterized geometries involved in these new classes of reactor is vital to ensure enhanced mixing characteristics and feasible manufacturability. Here we present a framework to rapidly solve this nonlinear, computat…
▽ More
The development of new manufacturing techniques such as 3D printing have enabled the creation of previously infeasible chemical reactor designs. Systematically optimizing the highly parameterized geometries involved in these new classes of reactor is vital to ensure enhanced mixing characteristics and feasible manufacturability. Here we present a framework to rapidly solve this nonlinear, computationally expensive, and derivative-free problem, enabling the fast prototype of novel reactor parameterizations. We take advantage of Gaussian processes to adaptively learn a multi-fidelity model of reactor simulations across a number of different continuous mesh fidelities. The search space of reactor geometries is explored through an amalgam of different, potentially lower, fidelity simulations which are chosen for evaluation based on weighted acquisition function, trading off information gain with cost of simulation. Within our framework we derive a novel criteria for monitoring the progress and dictating the termination of multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization, ensuring a high fidelity solution is returned before experimental budget is exhausted. The class of reactor we investigate are helical-tube reactors under pulsed-flow conditions, which have demonstrated outstanding mixing characteristics, have the potential to be highly parameterized, and are easily manufactured using 3D printing. To validate our results, we 3D print and experimentally validate the optimal reactor geometry, confirming its mixing performance. In doing so we demonstrate our design framework to be extensible to a broad variety of expensive simulation-based optimization problems, supporting the design of the next generation of highly parameterized chemical reactors.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2023; v1 submitted 1 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Optimization under Uncertainty
Authors:
Panagiotis Petsagkourakis,
Ilya Orson Sandoval,
Eric Bradford,
Dongda Zhang,
Ehecatl Antonio del Río Chanona
Abstract:
Dynamic real-time optimization (DRTO) is a challenging task due to the fact that optimal operating conditions must be computed in real time. The main bottleneck in the industrial application of DRTO is the presence of uncertainty. Many stochastic systems present the following obstacles: 1) plant-model mismatch, 2) process disturbances, 3) risks in violation of process constraints. To accommodate t…
▽ More
Dynamic real-time optimization (DRTO) is a challenging task due to the fact that optimal operating conditions must be computed in real time. The main bottleneck in the industrial application of DRTO is the presence of uncertainty. Many stochastic systems present the following obstacles: 1) plant-model mismatch, 2) process disturbances, 3) risks in violation of process constraints. To accommodate these difficulties, we present a constrained reinforcement learning (RL) based approach. RL naturally handles the process uncertainty by computing an optimal feedback policy. However, no state constraints can be introduced intuitively. To address this problem, we present a chance-constrained RL methodology. We use chance constraints to guarantee the probabilistic satisfaction of process constraints, which is accomplished by introducing backoffs, such that the optimal policy and backoffs are computed simultaneously. Backoffs are adjusted using the empirical cumulative distribution function to guarantee the satisfaction of a joint chance constraint. The advantage and performance of this strategy are illustrated through a stochastic dynamic bioprocess optimization problem, to produce sustainable high-value bioproducts.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Reinforcement Learning for Batch Bioprocess Optimization
Authors:
Panagiotis Petsagkourakis,
Ilya Orson Sandoval,
Eric Bradford,
Dongda Zhang,
Ehecatl Antonio del Rio Chanona
Abstract:
Bioprocesses have received a lot of attention to produce clean and sustainable alternatives to fossil-based materials. However, they are generally difficult to optimize due to their unsteady-state operation modes and stochastic behaviours. Furthermore, biological systems are highly complex, therefore plant-model mismatch is often present. To address the aforementioned challenges we propose a Reinf…
▽ More
Bioprocesses have received a lot of attention to produce clean and sustainable alternatives to fossil-based materials. However, they are generally difficult to optimize due to their unsteady-state operation modes and stochastic behaviours. Furthermore, biological systems are highly complex, therefore plant-model mismatch is often present. To address the aforementioned challenges we propose a Reinforcement learning based optimization strategy for batch processes.
In this work, we applied the Policy Gradient method from batch-to-batch to update a control policy parametrized by a recurrent neural network. We assume that a preliminary process model is available, which is exploited to obtain a preliminary optimal control policy. Subsequently, this policy is updatedbased on measurements from thetrueplant. The capabilities of our proposed approach were tested on three case studies (one of which is nonsmooth) using a more complex process model for thetruesystemembedded with adequate process disturbance. Lastly, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of this strategy compared against current existing approaches such as nonlinear model predictive control.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2019; v1 submitted 15 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
