Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Bornhofen, M

Pure Anderson Motives over Finite Fields

Authors: Matthias Bornhofen, Urs Hartl

Abstract: In the arithmetic of function fields Drinfeld modules play the role that elliptic curves take on in the arithmetic of number fields. As higher dimensional generalizations of Drinfeld modules, and as the appropriate analogues of abelian varieties, G. Anderson introduced pure t-motives. In this article we study the arithmetic of the later. We investigate which pure t-motives are semisimple, that i… ▽ More In the arithmetic of function fields Drinfeld modules play the role that elliptic curves take on in the arithmetic of number fields. As higher dimensional generalizations of Drinfeld modules, and as the appropriate analogues of abelian varieties, G. Anderson introduced pure t-motives. In this article we study the arithmetic of the later. We investigate which pure t-motives are semisimple, that is, isogenous to direct sums of simple ones. We give examples for pure t-motives which are not semisimple. Over finite fields the semisimplicity is equivalent to the semisimplicity of the endomorphism algebra, but also this fails over infinite fields. Still over finite fields we study the endomorphism rings of pure t-motives and criteria for the existence of isogenies. We obtain answers which are similar to Tate's famous results for abelian varieties. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2008; v1 submitted 18 September, 2007; originally announced September 2007.

Comments: v2: final version to appear in Journal of Number Theory. Note, this is the second part of the two-in-one article arXiv:math.NT/0609733

MSC Class: 11G09 (Primary); 13A35; 16K20 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Journal of Number Theory 129, n. 2 (2009), 247-283

Pure Anderson Motives and Abelian τ-Sheaves

Authors: Matthias Bornhofen, Urs Hartl

Abstract: Pure t-motives were introduced by G. Anderson as higher dimensional generalizations of Drinfeld modules, and as the appropriate analogs of abelian varieties in the arithmetic of function fields. In order to construct moduli spaces for pure t-motives the second author has previously introduced the concept of abelian τ-sheaf. In this article we clarify the relation between pure t-motives and abeli… ▽ More Pure t-motives were introduced by G. Anderson as higher dimensional generalizations of Drinfeld modules, and as the appropriate analogs of abelian varieties in the arithmetic of function fields. In order to construct moduli spaces for pure t-motives the second author has previously introduced the concept of abelian τ-sheaf. In this article we clarify the relation between pure t-motives and abelian τ-sheaves. We obtain an equivalence of the respective quasi-isogeny categories. Furthermore, we develop the elementary theory of both structures regarding morphisms, isogenies, Tate modules, and local shtukas. The later are the analogs of p-divisible groups. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2010; v1 submitted 18 September, 2007; originally announced September 2007.

Comments: final version as it appears in Mathematische Zeitschrift

MSC Class: 11G09 (Primary); 13A35 (Secondary)

Journal ref: Mathematische Zeitschrift 268 (2011), 67-100

Pure Anderson Motives and Abelian Sheaves over Finite Fields

Authors: Matthias Bornhofen, Urs Hartl

Abstract: Pure t-motives were introduced by G. Anderson as higher dimensional generalizations of Drinfeld modules, and as the appropriate analogs of abelian varieties in the arithmetic of function fields. In this article we develop their theory regarding morphisms, isogenies, Tate modules, and local shtukas. The later are the analog of p-divisible groups. We investigate which pure t-motives are semisimple… ▽ More Pure t-motives were introduced by G. Anderson as higher dimensional generalizations of Drinfeld modules, and as the appropriate analogs of abelian varieties in the arithmetic of function fields. In this article we develop their theory regarding morphisms, isogenies, Tate modules, and local shtukas. The later are the analog of p-divisible groups. We investigate which pure t-motives are semisimple, that is, isogenous to direct sums of simple ones. We give examples for pure t-motives which are not semisimple. Over finite fields the semisimplicity is equivalent to the semisimplicity of the endomorphism algebra, but also this fails over infinite fields. Still over finite fields we study the endomorphism rings of pure t-motives and obtain answers which are similar to Tate's famous results for abelian varieties. Finally we clarify the relation of pure t-motives to the abelian τ-sheaves introduced by the second author for the purpose of constructing moduli spaces. We obtain an equivalence of the respective quasi-isogeny categories. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2010; v1 submitted 26 September, 2006; originally announced September 2006.

Comments: v2: 48 pages, various results on Anderson's t-motives and their relation to abelian sheaves added; v3: 53 pages, section on Zeta functions added; v4=final version: this article has been split into arXiv:0709.2809 and arXiv:0709.2815 which both have been published

MSC Class: 11G09 (Primary); 13A35; 16K20 (Secondary)