-
Testing partial conjunction hypotheses under dependency, with applications to meta-analysis
Authors:
Marina Bogomolov
Abstract:
In many statistical problems the hypotheses are naturally divided into groups, and the investigators are interested to perform group-level inference, possibly along with inference on individual hypotheses. We consider the goal of discovering groups containing $u$ or more signals with group-level false discovery rate (FDR) control. This goal can be addressed by multiple testing of partial conjuncti…
▽ More
In many statistical problems the hypotheses are naturally divided into groups, and the investigators are interested to perform group-level inference, possibly along with inference on individual hypotheses. We consider the goal of discovering groups containing $u$ or more signals with group-level false discovery rate (FDR) control. This goal can be addressed by multiple testing of partial conjunction hypotheses with a parameter $u,$ which reduce to global null hypotheses for $u=1.$ We consider the case where the partial conjunction $p$-values are combinations of within-group $p$-values, and obtain sufficient conditions on (1) the dependencies among the $p$-values within and across the groups, (2) the combining method for obtaining partial conjunction $p$-values, and (3) the multiple testing procedure, for obtaining FDR control on partial conjunction discoveries. We consider separately the dependencies encountered in the meta-analysis setting, where multiple features are tested in several independent studies, and the $p$-values within each study may be dependent. Based on the results for this setting, we generalize the procedure of Benjamini, Heller, and Yekutieli (2009) for assessing replicability of signals across studies, and extend their theoretical results regarding FDR control with respect to replicability claims.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Assessing replicability of findings across two studies of multiple features
Authors:
Marina Bogomolov,
Ruth Heller
Abstract:
Replicability analysis aims to identify the findings that replicated across independent studies that examine the same features. We provide powerful novel replicability analysis procedures for two studies for FWER and for FDR control on the replicability claims. The suggested procedures first select the promising features from each study solely based on that study, and then test for replicability o…
▽ More
Replicability analysis aims to identify the findings that replicated across independent studies that examine the same features. We provide powerful novel replicability analysis procedures for two studies for FWER and for FDR control on the replicability claims. The suggested procedures first select the promising features from each study solely based on that study, and then test for replicability only the features that were selected in both studies. We incorporate the plug-in estimates of the fraction of null hypotheses in one study among the selected hypotheses by the other study. Since the fraction of nulls in one study among the selected features from the other study is typically small, the power gain can be remarkable. We provide theoretical guarantees for the control of the appropriate error rates, as well as simulations that demonstrate the excellent power properties of the suggested procedures. We demonstrate the usefulness of our procedures on real data examples from two application fields: behavioural genetics and microarray studies.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
-
Discovering findings that replicate from a primary study of high dimension to a follow-up study
Authors:
Marina Bogomolov,
Ruth Heller
Abstract:
We consider the problem of identifying whether findings replicate from one study of high dimension to another, when the primary study guides the selection of hypotheses to be examined in the follow-up study as well as when there is no division of roles into the primary and the follow-up study. We show that existing meta-analysis methods are not appropriate for this problem, and suggest novel metho…
▽ More
We consider the problem of identifying whether findings replicate from one study of high dimension to another, when the primary study guides the selection of hypotheses to be examined in the follow-up study as well as when there is no division of roles into the primary and the follow-up study. We show that existing meta-analysis methods are not appropriate for this problem, and suggest novel methods instead. We prove that our multiple testing procedures control for appropriate error-rates. The suggested FWER controlling procedure is valid for arbitrary dependence among the test statistics within each study. A more powerful procedure is suggested for FDR control. We prove that this procedure controls the FDR if the test statistics are independent within the primary study, and independent or have dependence of type PRDS in the follow-up study. For arbitrary dependence within the primary study, and either arbitrary dependence or dependence of type PRDS in the follow-up study, simple conservative modifications of the procedure control the FDR. We demonstrate the usefulness of these procedures via simulations and real data examples.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2013; v1 submitted 1 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Adjusting for selection bias in testing multiple families of hypotheses
Authors:
Yoav Benjamini,
Marina Bogomolov
Abstract:
In many large multiple testing problems the hypotheses are divided into families. Given the data, families with evidence for true discoveries are selected, and hypotheses within them are tested. Neither controlling the error-rate in each family separately nor controlling the error-rate over all hypotheses together can assure that an error-rate is controlled in the selected families. We formulate t…
▽ More
In many large multiple testing problems the hypotheses are divided into families. Given the data, families with evidence for true discoveries are selected, and hypotheses within them are tested. Neither controlling the error-rate in each family separately nor controlling the error-rate over all hypotheses together can assure that an error-rate is controlled in the selected families. We formulate this concern about selective inference in its generality, for a very wide class of error-rates and for any selection criterion, and present an adjustment of the testing level inside the selected families that retains the average error-rate over the selected families.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2011;
originally announced June 2011.
