-
Stable Dividends under Linear-Quadratic Optimization
Authors:
Benjamin Avanzi,
Debbie Kusch Falden,
Mogens Steffensen
Abstract:
The optimization criterion for dividends from a risky business is most often formalized in terms of the expected present value of future dividends. That criterion disregards a potential, explicit demand for stability of dividends. In particular, within actuarial risk theory, maximization of future dividends have been intensively studied as the so-called de Finetti problem. However, there the optim…
▽ More
The optimization criterion for dividends from a risky business is most often formalized in terms of the expected present value of future dividends. That criterion disregards a potential, explicit demand for stability of dividends. In particular, within actuarial risk theory, maximization of future dividends have been intensively studied as the so-called de Finetti problem. However, there the optimal strategies typically become so-called barrier strategies. These are far from stable and suboptimal affine dividend strategies have therefore received attention recently. In contrast, in the class of linear-quadratic problems a demand for stability if explicitly stressed. These have most often been studied in diffusion models different from the actuarial risk models. We bridge the gap between these patterns of thinking by deriving optimal affine dividend strategies under a linear-quadratic criterion for a general Lévy process. We characterize the value function by the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, solve it, and compare the objective and the optimal controls to the classical objective of maximizing expected present value of future dividends. Thereby we provide a framework within which stability of dividends from a risky business, as e.g. in classical risk theory, is explicitly demanded and explicitly obtained.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Optimal reinsurance design under solvency constraints
Authors:
Benjamin Avanzi,
Hayden Lau,
Mogens Steffensen
Abstract:
We consider the optimal risk transfer from an insurance company to a reinsurer. The problem formulation considered in this paper is closely connected to the optimal portfolio problem in finance, with some crucial distinctions. In particular, the insurance company's surplus is here (as is routinely the case) approximated by a Brownian motion, as opposed to the geometric Brownian motion used to mode…
▽ More
We consider the optimal risk transfer from an insurance company to a reinsurer. The problem formulation considered in this paper is closely connected to the optimal portfolio problem in finance, with some crucial distinctions. In particular, the insurance company's surplus is here (as is routinely the case) approximated by a Brownian motion, as opposed to the geometric Brownian motion used to model assets in finance. Furthermore, risk exposure is dialled "down" via reinsurance, rather than "up" via risky investments. This leads to interesting qualitative differences in the optimal designs.
In this paper, using the martingale method, we derive the optimal design as a function of proportional, non-cheap reinsurance design that maximises the quadratic utility of the terminal value of the insurance surplus. We also consider several realistic constraints on the terminal value: a strict lower boundary, the probability (Value at Risk) constraint, and the expected shortfall (conditional Value at Risk) constraints under the $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$ measures, respectively. In all cases, the optimal reinsurance designs boil down to a combination of proportional protection and option-like protection (stop-loss) of the residual proportion with various deductibles. Proportions and deductibles are set such that the initial capital is fully allocated. Comparison of the optimal designs with the optimal portfolios in finance is particularly interesting. Results are illustrated.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2023; v1 submitted 30 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
On the surplus management of funds with assets and liabilities in presence of solvency requirements
Authors:
Benjamin Avanzi,
Ping Chen,
Lars Frederik Brandt Henriksen,
Bernard Wong
Abstract:
In this paper we consider a company whose assets and liabilities evolve according to a correlated bivariate geometric Brownian motion, such as in Gerber and Shiu (2003). We determine what dividend strategy maximises the expected present value of dividends until ruin in two cases: (i) when shareholders won't cover surplus shortfalls and a solvency constraint (as in Paulsen, 2003) is consequently im…
▽ More
In this paper we consider a company whose assets and liabilities evolve according to a correlated bivariate geometric Brownian motion, such as in Gerber and Shiu (2003). We determine what dividend strategy maximises the expected present value of dividends until ruin in two cases: (i) when shareholders won't cover surplus shortfalls and a solvency constraint (as in Paulsen, 2003) is consequently imposed, and (ii) when shareholders are always to fund any capital deficiency with capital (asset) injections. In the latter case, ruin will never occur and the objective is to maximise the difference between dividends and capital injections.
Developing and using appropriate verification lemmas, we show that the optimal dividend strategy is, in both cases, of barrier type. Both value functions are derived in closed form. Furthermore, the barrier is defined on the ratio of assets to liabilities, which mimics some of the dividend strategies that can be observed in practice by insurance companies. Existence and uniqueness of the optimal strategies are shown. Results are illustrated.
△ Less
Submitted 5 August, 2022; v1 submitted 9 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
On the optimality of joint periodic and extraordinary dividend strategies
Authors:
Benjamin Avanzi,
Hayden Lau,
Bernard Wong
Abstract:
In this paper, we model the cash surplus (or equity) of a risky business with a Brownian motion. Owners can take cash out of the surplus in the form of "dividends", subject to transaction costs. However, if the surplus hits 0 then ruin occurs and the business cannot operate any more.
We consider two types of dividend distributions: (i) periodic, regular ones (that is, dividends can be paid only…
▽ More
In this paper, we model the cash surplus (or equity) of a risky business with a Brownian motion. Owners can take cash out of the surplus in the form of "dividends", subject to transaction costs. However, if the surplus hits 0 then ruin occurs and the business cannot operate any more.
We consider two types of dividend distributions: (i) periodic, regular ones (that is, dividends can be paid only at countable many points in time, according to a specific arrival process); and (ii) extraordinary dividend payments that can be made immediately at any time (that is, the dividend decision time space is continuous and matches that of the surplus process). Both types of dividends attract proportional transaction costs, and extraordinary distributions also attracts fixed transaction costs, a realistic feature. A dividend strategy that involves both types of distributions (periodic and extraordinary) is qualified as "hybrid".
We determine which strategies (either periodic, immediate, or hybrid) are optimal, that is, we show which are the strategies that maximise the expected present value of dividends paid until ruin, net of transaction costs. Sometimes, a liquidation strategy (which pays out all monies and stops the process) is optimal. Which strategy is optimal depends on the profitability of the business, and the level of (proportional and fixed) transaction costs. Results are illustrated.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2020; v1 submitted 1 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Optimal periodic dividend strategies for spectrally negative Lévy processes with fixed transaction costs
Authors:
Benjamin Avanzi,
Hayden Lau,
Bernard Wong
Abstract:
Maximising dividends is one classical stability criterion in actuarial risk theory. Motivated by the fact that dividends are paid periodically in real life, $\textit{periodic}$ dividend strategies were recently introduced (Albrecher, Gerber and Shiu, 2011). In this paper, we incorporate fixed transaction costs into the model and study the optimal periodic dividend strategy with fixed transaction c…
▽ More
Maximising dividends is one classical stability criterion in actuarial risk theory. Motivated by the fact that dividends are paid periodically in real life, $\textit{periodic}$ dividend strategies were recently introduced (Albrecher, Gerber and Shiu, 2011). In this paper, we incorporate fixed transaction costs into the model and study the optimal periodic dividend strategy with fixed transaction costs for spectrally negative Lévy processes.
The value function of a periodic $(b_u,b_l)$ strategy is calculated by means of exiting identities and Itô's excusion when the surplus process is of unbounded variation. We show that a sufficient condition for optimality is that the Lévy measure admits a density which is completely monotonic. Under such assumptions, a periodic $(b_u,b_l)$ strategy is confirmed to be optimal.
Results are illustrated.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2020; v1 submitted 3 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Optimal periodic dividend strategies for spectrally positive Lévy risk processes with fixed transaction costs
Authors:
Benjamin Avanzi,
Hayden Lau,
Bernard Wong
Abstract:
We consider the general class of spectrally positive Lévy risk processes, which are appropriate for businesses with continuous expenses and lump sum gains whose timing and sizes are stochastic. Motivated by the fact that dividends cannot be paid at any time in real life, we study $\textit{periodic}$ dividend strategies whereby dividend decisions are made according to a separate arrival process.…
▽ More
We consider the general class of spectrally positive Lévy risk processes, which are appropriate for businesses with continuous expenses and lump sum gains whose timing and sizes are stochastic. Motivated by the fact that dividends cannot be paid at any time in real life, we study $\textit{periodic}$ dividend strategies whereby dividend decisions are made according to a separate arrival process.
In this paper, we investigate the impact of fixed transaction costs on the optimal periodic dividend strategy, and show that a periodic $(b_u,b_l)$ strategy is optimal when decision times arrive according to an independent Poisson process. Such a strategy leads to lump sum dividends that bring the surplus back to $b_l$ as long as it is no less than $b_u$ at a dividend decision time. The expected present value of dividends (net of transaction costs) is provided explicitly with the help of scale functions. Results are illustrated.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2020; v1 submitted 30 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
A counterexample to the central limit theorem for pairwise independent random variables having a common arbitrary margin
Authors:
Benjamin Avanzi,
Guillaume Boglioni Beaulieu,
Pierre Lafaye de Micheaux,
Frédéric Ouimet,
Bernard Wong
Abstract:
The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is one of the most fundamental results in statistics. It states that the standardized sample mean of a sequence of $n$ mutually independent and identically distributed random variables with finite first and second moments converges in distribution to a standard Gaussian as $n$ goes to infinity. In particular, pairwise independence of the sequence is generally not su…
▽ More
The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is one of the most fundamental results in statistics. It states that the standardized sample mean of a sequence of $n$ mutually independent and identically distributed random variables with finite first and second moments converges in distribution to a standard Gaussian as $n$ goes to infinity. In particular, pairwise independence of the sequence is generally not sufficient for the theorem to hold. We construct explicitly a sequence of pairwise independent random variables having a common but arbitrary marginal distribution $F$ (satisfying very mild conditions) for which the CLT is not verified. We study the extent of this 'failure' of the CLT by obtaining, in closed form, the asymptotic distribution of the sample mean of our sequence. This is illustrated through several theoretical examples, for which we provide associated computing codes in the R language.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2020; v1 submitted 3 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
On optimal joint reflective and refractive dividend strategies in spectrally positive Lévy models
Authors:
Benjamin Avanzi,
José-Luis Pérez,
Bernard Wong,
Kazutoshi Yamazaki
Abstract:
The expected present value of dividends is one of the classical stability criteria in actuarial risk theory. In this context, numerous papers considered threshold (refractive) and barrier (reflective) dividend strategies. These were shown to be optimal in a number of different contexts for bounded and unbounded payout rates, respectively. In this paper, motivated by the behaviour of some dividend…
▽ More
The expected present value of dividends is one of the classical stability criteria in actuarial risk theory. In this context, numerous papers considered threshold (refractive) and barrier (reflective) dividend strategies. These were shown to be optimal in a number of different contexts for bounded and unbounded payout rates, respectively. In this paper, motivated by the behaviour of some dividend paying stock exchange companies, we determine the optimal dividend strategy when both continuous (refractive) and lump sum (reflective) dividends can be paid at any time, and if they are subject to different transaction rates. We consider the general family of spectrally positive Lévy processes. Using scale functions, we obtain explicit formulas for the expected present value of dividends until ruin, with a penalty at ruin. We develop a verification lemma, and show that a two-layer (a,b) strategy is optimal. Such a strategy pays continuous dividends when the surplus exceeds level a>0, and all of the excess over b>a as lump sum dividend payments. Results are illustrated.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2016; v1 submitted 7 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
