-
Stability Theorems for Forbidden Configurations
Authors:
Richard P. Anstee,
Benjamin Kreiswirth,
Bowen Li,
Attila Sali,
Jaehwan Seok
Abstract:
Stability is a well investigated concept in extremal combinatorics. The main idea is that if some object is close in size to an extremal object, then it retains the structure of the extremal construction. In the present paper we study stability in the context of forbidden configurations. $(0,1)$-matrix $F$ is a configuration in a $(0,1)$-matrix $A$ if $F$ is a row and columns permutation of a subm…
▽ More
Stability is a well investigated concept in extremal combinatorics. The main idea is that if some object is close in size to an extremal object, then it retains the structure of the extremal construction. In the present paper we study stability in the context of forbidden configurations. $(0,1)$-matrix $F$ is a configuration in a $(0,1)$-matrix $A$ if $F$ is a row and columns permutation of a submatrix of $A$. $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ denotes the set of $m$-rowed $(0,1)$-matrices with pairwise distinct columns without configuration $F$, $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ is the largest number of columns of a matrix in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$, while $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$ is the set of matrices in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ of size $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$. We show cases (i) when each element of $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ have the structure of element(s) in $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$, (ii) $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)=Θ(m^2)$ and the size of $A\in \mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ deviates from $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ by a linear amount, or (iii) $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)=Θ(m)$ and the size of $A$ is smaller by a constant, then the structure of $A$ is same as the structure of a matrix in $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Design Theory and some Forbidden Configurations
Authors:
R. P. Anstee,
Farzin Barekat,
Zachary Pellegrin
Abstract:
In this paper we relate t-designs to a forbidden configuration problem in extremal set theory. Let 1_t 0_l denote a column of t 1's on top of l 0's. We assume t>l. Let q. (1_t 0_l) denote the (t+l)xq matrix consisting of t rows of q 1's and l rows of q 0's. We consider extremal problems for matrices avoiding certain submatrices. Let A be a (0,1)-matrix forbidding any (t+l)x(λ+2) submatrix (λ+2). (…
▽ More
In this paper we relate t-designs to a forbidden configuration problem in extremal set theory. Let 1_t 0_l denote a column of t 1's on top of l 0's. We assume t>l. Let q. (1_t 0_l) denote the (t+l)xq matrix consisting of t rows of q 1's and l rows of q 0's. We consider extremal problems for matrices avoiding certain submatrices. Let A be a (0,1)-matrix forbidding any (t+l)x(λ+2) submatrix (λ+2). (1_t 0_l) . Assume A is m-rowed and only columns of sum t+1,t+2,... ,m-l are allowed to be repeated. Assume that A has the maximum number of columns subject to the given restrictions. Assume m is sufficiently large. Then A has each column of sum 0,1,... ,t and m-l+1,m-l+2,..., m exactly once and, given the appropriate divisibility condition, the columns of sum t+1 correspond to a t-design with block size t+1 and parameter λand there are no other columns. The proof derives a basic upper bound on the number of columns of A by a pigeonhole argument and then a careful argument, for large m, reduces the bound by a substantial amount down to the value given by design based constructions. We extend in a few directions.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Design Theory and Some Non-simple Forbidden Configurations
Authors:
R. P. Anstee,
Farzin Barekat
Abstract:
Let 1_k 0_l denote the (k+l)\times 1 column of k 1's above l 0's. Let q. (1_k 0_l) $ denote the (k+l)xq matrix with q copies of the column 1_k0_l. A 2-design S_λ(2,3,v) can be defined as a vx(λ/3)\binom{v}{2} (0,1)-matrix with all column sums equal 3 and with no submatrix (λ+1).(1_20_0). Consider an mxn matrix A with all column sums in {3,4,... ,m-1}. Assume m is sufficiently large (with respect t…
▽ More
Let 1_k 0_l denote the (k+l)\times 1 column of k 1's above l 0's. Let q. (1_k 0_l) $ denote the (k+l)xq matrix with q copies of the column 1_k0_l. A 2-design S_λ(2,3,v) can be defined as a vx(λ/3)\binom{v}{2} (0,1)-matrix with all column sums equal 3 and with no submatrix (λ+1).(1_20_0). Consider an mxn matrix A with all column sums in {3,4,... ,m-1}. Assume m is sufficiently large (with respect to λ) and assume that A has no submatrix which is a row permutation of (λ+1). (1_2 0_1). Then we show the number of columns in A is at most (λ)/3)\binom{m}{3} with equality for A being the columns of column sum 3 corresponding to the triples of a 2-design S_λ(2,3,m). A similar results holds for(λ+1). (1_2 0_2).
Define a matrix to be simple if it is a (0,1)-matrix with no repeated columns. Given two matrices A, F, we define A to have F as a configuration if and only if some submatrix of A is a row and column permutation of F. Given m, let forb(m,q.(1_k 0_l)) denote the maximum number of possible columns in a simple m-rowed matrix which has no configuration q.(1_k 0_l). For m sufficiently large with respect to q, we compute exact values for forb(m,q.(1_1 0_1)), forb(m,q.(1_2 0_1)), forb(m,q.(1_2 0_2)). In the latter two cases, we use a construction of Dehon (1983) of simple triple systems S_λ(2,3,v) for λ>1. Moreover for l=1,2, simple mxforb(m,q.(1_2 0_l)) matrices with no configuration q.(1_2 0_l) must arise from simple 2-designs S_λ(2,3,m) of appropriate λ.
The proofs derive a basic upper bound by a pigeonhole argument and then use careful counting and Turan's bound, for large m, to reduce the bound. For small m, the larger pigeonhole bounds are sometimes the exact bound. There are intermediate values of m for which we do not know the exact bound.
△ Less
Submitted 17 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Unavoidable Multicoloured Families of Configurations
Authors:
Richard P. Anstee,
Linyuan Lu
Abstract:
Balogh and Bollobás [{\em Combinatorica 25, 2005}] prove that for any $k$ there is a constant $f(k)$ such that any set system with at least $f(k)$ sets reduces to a $k$-star, an $k$-costar or an $k$-chain. They proved $f(k)<(2k)^{2^k}$. Here we improve it to $f(k)<2^{ck^2}$ for some constant $c>0$.
This is a special case of the following result on the multi-coloured forbidden configurations at 2…
▽ More
Balogh and Bollobás [{\em Combinatorica 25, 2005}] prove that for any $k$ there is a constant $f(k)$ such that any set system with at least $f(k)$ sets reduces to a $k$-star, an $k$-costar or an $k$-chain. They proved $f(k)<(2k)^{2^k}$. Here we improve it to $f(k)<2^{ck^2}$ for some constant $c>0$.
This is a special case of the following result on the multi-coloured forbidden configurations at 2 colours. Let $r$ be given. Then there exists a constant $c_r$ so that a matrix with entries drawn from $\{0,1,...,r-1\}$ with at least $2^{c_rk^2}$ different columns will have a $k\times k$ submatrix that can have its rows and columns permuted so that in the resulting matrix will be either $I_k(a,b)$ or $T_k(a,b)$ (for some $a\ne b\in \{0,1,..., r-1\}$), where $I_k(a,b)$ is the $k\times k$ matrix with $a$'s on the diagonal and $b$'s else where, $T_k(a,b)$ the $k\times k$ matrix with $a$'s below the diagonal and $b$'s elsewhere. We also extend to considering the bound on the number of distinct columns, given that the number of rows is $m$, when avoiding a $t k\times k$ matrix obtained by taking any one of the $k \times k$ matrices above and repeating each column $t$ times. We use Ramsey Theory.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2014; v1 submitted 14 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
-
Forbidden Families of Configurations
Authors:
R. P. Anstee,
Christina L. Koch
Abstract:
A simple matrix is a (0,1)-matrix with no repeated columns. For a (0,1)-matrix $F$, we say that a (0,1)-matrix $A$ has $F$ as a configuration if there is a submatrix of $A$ which is a row and column permutation of $F$ (trace is the set system version of a configuration). Let $\ncols{A}$ denote the number of columns of $A$. Let ${\cal F}$ be a family of matrices. We define the extremal function…
▽ More
A simple matrix is a (0,1)-matrix with no repeated columns. For a (0,1)-matrix $F$, we say that a (0,1)-matrix $A$ has $F$ as a configuration if there is a submatrix of $A$ which is a row and column permutation of $F$ (trace is the set system version of a configuration). Let $\ncols{A}$ denote the number of columns of $A$. Let ${\cal F}$ be a family of matrices. We define the extremal function $forb(m,{\cal F})=\max{\ncols{A} : A is m-rowed simple matrix and has no configuration F\in{\cal F}}$. We consider some families ${\cal F}=\{F_1,F_2,\ldots, F_t\}$ such that individually each $\forb(m,F_i)$ has greater asymptotic growth than $\forb(m,{\cal F})$.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
-
Repeated columns and an old chestnut
Authors:
Richard P. Anstee,
Linyuan Lu
Abstract:
Let $t\ge 1$ be a given integer. Let ${\cal F}$ be a family of subsets of $[m]=\{1,2,\ldots,m\}$. Assume that for every pair of disjoint sets $S,T\subset [m]$ with $|S|=|T|=k$, there do not exist $2t$ sets in ${\cal F}$ where $t$ subsets of ${\cal F}$ contain $S$ and are disjoint from $T$ and $t$ subsets of ${\cal F}$ contain $T$ and are disjoint from $S$. We show that $|{\cal F}|$ is $O(m^{k})$.…
▽ More
Let $t\ge 1$ be a given integer. Let ${\cal F}$ be a family of subsets of $[m]=\{1,2,\ldots,m\}$. Assume that for every pair of disjoint sets $S,T\subset [m]$ with $|S|=|T|=k$, there do not exist $2t$ sets in ${\cal F}$ where $t$ subsets of ${\cal F}$ contain $S$ and are disjoint from $T$ and $t$ subsets of ${\cal F}$ contain $T$ and are disjoint from $S$. We show that $|{\cal F}|$ is $O(m^{k})$.
Our main new ingredient is allowing, during the inductive proof, multisets of subsets of $[m]$ where the multiplicity of a given set is bounded by $t-1$. We use a strong stability result of Anstee and Keevash. This is further evidence for a conjecture of Anstee and Sali. These problems can be stated in the language of matrices Let $t\cdot M$ denote $t$ copies of the matrix $M$ concatenated together. We have established the conjecture for those configurations $t\cdot F$ for any $k\times 2$ (0,1)-matrix $F$.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
Knot polynomials and generalized mutation
Authors:
Richard P. Anstee,
Jozef H. Przytycki,
Dale Rolfsen
Abstract:
The motivation for this work was to construct a nontrivial knot with trivial Jones polynomial. Although that open problem has not yielded, the methods are useful for other problems in the theory of knot polynomials. The subject of the present paper is a generalization of Conway's mutation of knots and links. Instead of flipping a 2-strand tangle, one flips a many-string tangle to produce a gener…
▽ More
The motivation for this work was to construct a nontrivial knot with trivial Jones polynomial. Although that open problem has not yielded, the methods are useful for other problems in the theory of knot polynomials. The subject of the present paper is a generalization of Conway's mutation of knots and links. Instead of flipping a 2-strand tangle, one flips a many-string tangle to produce a generalized mutant. In the presence of rotational symmetry in that tangle, the result is called a "rotant". We show that if a rotant is sufficiently simple, then its Jones polynomial agrees with that of the original link. As an application, this provides a method of generating many examples of links with the same Jones polynomial, but different Alexander polynomials. Various other knot polynomials, as well as signature, are also invariant under such moves, if one imposes more stringent conditions upon the symmetries. Applications are also given to polynomials of satellites and symmetric knots.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2004;
originally announced May 2004.
