Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Amlashi, M E

Searching in archive math. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2203.01134  [pdf, ps, other

    math.FA

    On bounds of logarithmic mean and mean inequality chain

    Authors: Shigeru Furuichi, Mehdi Eghbali Amlashi

    Abstract: An upper bound of the logarithmic mean is given by a convex combination of the arithmetic mean and the geometric mean. In addition, a lower bound of the logarithmic mean is given by a geometric bridge of the arithmetic mean and the geometric mean. In this paper, we study the bounds of the logarithmic mean. We give operator inequalities and norm inequalities for the fundamental inequalities on the… ▽ More

    Submitted 11 January, 2024; v1 submitted 21 February, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

    Comments: 18 pages

  2. arXiv:2111.03402  [pdf, ps, other

    math.FA

    A Refinement of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality and some more

    Authors: Mehdi Eghbali Amlashi, Mahmoud Hassani

    Abstract: In this note, we present a refinement of the well-known AM-GM inequality. We use this improved inequalty to establish corresponding inequalities on Hilbert space. We also give some refinements of the Kantorovich inequality.

    Submitted 5 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

  3. arXiv:2111.01128  [pdf, ps, other

    math.CA

    More results on weighted means

    Authors: Shigeru Furuichi, Mehdi Eghbali Amlashi

    Abstract: We give a refined Young inequality which generalizes the inequality by Zou--Jiang. We also show the upper bound for the logarithmic mean by the use of the weighted geometric mean and the weighted arithmetic mean. Furthermore, we show some inequalities among the weighted means. Based on the obtained essential scalar inequalities, we give some operator inequalities. In particular, we give a generali… ▽ More

    Submitted 11 March, 2022; v1 submitted 29 October, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

    Comments: 13 pages. The title was changed. The proof of Theorem 2.5 was modified. Remark 2.6 (ii) was added