Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Alshehri, K

Quantification of Market Power Mitigation via Efficient Aggregation of Distributed Energy Resources

Authors: Zuguang Gao, Khaled Alshehri, John R. Birge

Abstract: Distributed energy resources (DERs) such as solar panels have small supply capacities and cannot be directly integrated into wholesale markets. So, the presence of an intermediary is critical. The intermediary could be a profit-seeking entity (called the aggregator) that buys DER supply from prosumers, and then sells them in the wholesale electricity market. Thus, DER integration has an influence… ▽ More Distributed energy resources (DERs) such as solar panels have small supply capacities and cannot be directly integrated into wholesale markets. So, the presence of an intermediary is critical. The intermediary could be a profit-seeking entity (called the aggregator) that buys DER supply from prosumers, and then sells them in the wholesale electricity market. Thus, DER integration has an influence on wholesale market prices, demand, and supply. The purpose of this article is to shed light onto the impact of efficient DER aggregation on the market power of conventional generators. Firstly, under efficient DER aggregation, we quantify the social welfare gap between two cases: when conventional generators are truthful, and when they are strategic. We also do the same when DERs are not present. Secondly, we show that the gap due to market power of generators in the presence of DERs is smaller than the one when there is no DER participation. Finally, we provide explicit expressions of the gaps and conduct numerical experiments to gain deeper insights. The main message of this article is that market power of conventional generators can be mitigated by adopting an efficient DER aggregation model. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

On Efficient Aggregation of Distributed Energy Resources

Authors: Zuguang Gao, Khaled Alshehri, John R. Birge

Abstract: The rapid expansion of distributed energy resources (DERs) is one of the most significant changes to electricity systems around the world. Examples of DERs include solar panels, small natural gas-fueled generators, combined heat and power plants, etc. Due to the small supply capacities of these DERs, it is impractical for them to participate directly in the wholesale electricity market. We study i… ▽ More The rapid expansion of distributed energy resources (DERs) is one of the most significant changes to electricity systems around the world. Examples of DERs include solar panels, small natural gas-fueled generators, combined heat and power plants, etc. Due to the small supply capacities of these DERs, it is impractical for them to participate directly in the wholesale electricity market. We study in this paper an efficient aggregation model where a profit-maximizing aggregator procures electricity from DERs, and sells them in the wholesale market. The interaction between the aggregator and the DER owners is modeled as a Stackelberg game: the aggregator adopts two-part pricing by announcing a participation fee and a per-unit price of procurement for each DER owner, and the DER owner responds by choosing her payoff-maximizing energy supplies. We show that our proposed model preserves full market efficiency, i.e., the social welfare achieved by the aggregation model is the same as that when DERs participate directly in the wholesale market. We also note that two-part pricing is critical for market efficiency, and illustrate via an example that with one-part pricing, there will be an efficiency loss from DER aggregation, due to the profit-seeking behavior of the aggregator. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Quantifying Market Efficiency Impacts of Aggregated Distributed Energy Resources

Authors: Khaled Alshehri, Mariola Ndrio, Subhonmesh Bose, Tamer Başar

Abstract: We focus on the aggregation of distributed energy resources (DERs) through a profit-maximizing intermediary that enables participation of DERs in wholesale electricity markets. Particularly, we study the market efficiency brought in by the large-scale deployment of DERs and explore to what extent such benefits are offset by the profit-maximizing nature of the aggregator. We deploy a game-theoretic… ▽ More We focus on the aggregation of distributed energy resources (DERs) through a profit-maximizing intermediary that enables participation of DERs in wholesale electricity markets. Particularly, we study the market efficiency brought in by the large-scale deployment of DERs and explore to what extent such benefits are offset by the profit-maximizing nature of the aggregator. We deploy a game-theoretic framework to study the strategic interactions between an aggregator and DER owners. The proposed model takes into account the stochastic nature of the DER supply. We explicitly characterize the equilibrium of the game and provide illustrative examples to quantify the efficiency loss due to the strategic incentives of the aggregator. Our numerical experiments illustrate the impact of uncertainty and amount of DER integration on the overall market efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2020; v1 submitted 7 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Centralized Volatility Reduction for Electricity Markets

Authors: Khaled Alshehri, Subhonmesh Bose, Tamer Başar

Abstract: Increased penetration of wind energy will make electricity market prices more volatile. As a result, market participants will bear increased financial risks, which impact investment decisions and in turn, makes it harder to achieve sustainable energy goals. As a remedy, in this paper, we propose an insurance market that complements any wholesale market design. Our mechanism can be run by any suita… ▽ More Increased penetration of wind energy will make electricity market prices more volatile. As a result, market participants will bear increased financial risks, which impact investment decisions and in turn, makes it harder to achieve sustainable energy goals. As a remedy, in this paper, we propose an insurance market that complements any wholesale market design. Our mechanism can be run by any suitable financial entity such as an independent system operator, with the aim of reducing the financial impacts of volatile prices. We provide theoretical guarantees, analytically characterize the outcomes over a copperplate power system example, and numerically explore the same for a modified IEEE 14-bus test system. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2021; v1 submitted 16 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1704.00369

A Game-Theoretic Framework for Multi-Period-Multi-Company Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid

Authors: Khaled Alshehri, Ji Liu, Xudong Chen, Tamer Başar

Abstract: By utilizing tools from game theory, we develop a novel multi-period-multi-company demand response framework considering the interactions between companies (sellers of energy) and their consumers (buyers of energy). We model the interactions in terms of a Stackelberg game, where companies set their prices and consumers respond by choosing their demands. We show that the underlying game has a uniqu… ▽ More By utilizing tools from game theory, we develop a novel multi-period-multi-company demand response framework considering the interactions between companies (sellers of energy) and their consumers (buyers of energy). We model the interactions in terms of a Stackelberg game, where companies set their prices and consumers respond by choosing their demands. We show that the underlying game has a unique equilibrium at which the companies maximize their revenues while the consumers maximize their utilities subject to their local constraints. Closed-form expressions are provided for the optimal strategies of all players. Based on these solutions, a power allocation game has been formulated, which is shown to admit a unique pure-strategy Nash equilibrium, for which closed-form expressions are also provided. This equilibrium is found under the assumption that companies can freely allocate their power across the time horizon, but we also demonstrate that it is possible to relax this assumption. We further provide a fast distributed algorithm for the computation of all optimal strategies using only local information. We also study the effect of variations in the number of periods (subdivisions of the time horizon) and the number of consumers. As a consequence, we are able to find an appropriate company-to-consumer ratio when the number of consumers participating in demand response exceeds some threshold. Furthermore, we show, both analytically and numerically, that the multi-period scheme provides incentives for energy consumers to participate in demand response, compared to the single-period framework studied in the literature. In our framework, we provide a condition for the minimum budgets consumers need, and carry out case studies using real life data to demonstrate the benefits of the approach, which show potential savings of up to $30\%$ and equilibrium prices that have low volatility. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2020; v1 submitted 29 September, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Comments: To appear in IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology

Cash-settled options for wholesale electricity markets

Authors: Khaled Alshehri, Subhonmesh Bose, Tamer Başar

Abstract: Wholesale electricity market designs in practice do not provide the market participants with adequate mechanisms to hedge their financial risks. Demanders and suppliers will likely face even greater risks with the deepening penetration of variable renewable resources like wind and solar. This paper explores the design of a centralized cash-settled call option market to mitigate such risks. A cash-… ▽ More Wholesale electricity market designs in practice do not provide the market participants with adequate mechanisms to hedge their financial risks. Demanders and suppliers will likely face even greater risks with the deepening penetration of variable renewable resources like wind and solar. This paper explores the design of a centralized cash-settled call option market to mitigate such risks. A cash-settled call option is a financial instrument that allows its holder the right to claim a monetary reward equal to the positive difference between the real-time price of an underlying commodity and a pre-negotiated strike price for an upfront fee. Through an example, we illustrate that a bilateral call option can reduce the payment volatility of market participants. Then, we design a centralized clearing mechanism for call options that generalizes the bilateral trade. We illustrate through an example how the centralized clearing mechanism generalizes the bilateral trade. Finally, the effect of risk preference of the market participants, as well as some generalizations are discussed. △ Less

Submitted 2 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: Proc. 20th IFAC World Congress (IFAC WC 2017), Toulouse, France, July 9-14, 2017 (accepted)

A Stackelberg Game for Multi-Period Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid

Authors: Khaled Alshehri, Ji Liu, Xudong Chen, Tamer Başar

Abstract: This paper studies a multi-period demand response management problem in the smart grid where multiple utility companies compete among themselves. The user-utility interactions are modeled by a noncooperative game of a Stackelberg type where the interactions among the utility companies are captured through a Nash equilibrium. It is shown that this game has a unique Stackelberg equilibrium at which… ▽ More This paper studies a multi-period demand response management problem in the smart grid where multiple utility companies compete among themselves. The user-utility interactions are modeled by a noncooperative game of a Stackelberg type where the interactions among the utility companies are captured through a Nash equilibrium. It is shown that this game has a unique Stackelberg equilibrium at which the utility companies set prices to maximize their revenues (within a Nash game) while the users respond accordingly to maximize their utilities subject to their budget constraints. Closed-form expressions are provided for the corresponding strategies of the users and the utility companies. It is shown that the multi- period scheme, compared with the single-period case, provides more incentives for the users to participate in the game. A necessary and sufficient condition on the minimum budget needed for a user to participate is provided. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2015; v1 submitted 10 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: Accepted for Proc. 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control