-
A generalized fundamental solution technique for the regularized 13-moment system in rarefied gas flows
Authors:
Himanshi,
Lambert Theisen,
Anirudh Singh Rana,
Manuel Torrilhon,
Vinay Kumar Gupta
Abstract:
In this work, we explore the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) for solving the regularized 13-moment (R13) equations for rarefied monatomic gases. While previous applications of the MFS in rarefied gas flows relied on problem-specific fundamental solutions, we propose a generic approach that systematically computes the fundamental solutions for any linear moment system without predefined sourc…
▽ More
In this work, we explore the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) for solving the regularized 13-moment (R13) equations for rarefied monatomic gases. While previous applications of the MFS in rarefied gas flows relied on problem-specific fundamental solutions, we propose a generic approach that systematically computes the fundamental solutions for any linear moment system without predefined source terms. The generalized framework is first introduced using a simple example involving the Stokes equations, and is then extended to the R13 equations. The results obtained from the generic MFS are validated against an analytical solution for the R13 equations. Following validation, the framework is applied to the case of thermally-induced flow between two non-coaxial cylinders. Since no analytical solution exists for this case, we compare the results obtained from the MFS with those obtained from the finite element method (FEM). To further assess computational efficiency, we analyze the runtimes of the FEM and MFS. The results indicate that the MFS converges faster than the FEM and serves as a promising alternative to conventional meshing-based techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Exploring external rarefied gas flows through the method of fundamental solutions
Authors:
Himanshi,
Anirudh Singh Rana,
Vinay Kumar Gupta
Abstract:
The well-known Navier--Stokes--Fourier equations of fluid dynamics are, in general, not adequate for describing rarefied gas flows. Moreover, while the Stokes equations -- a simplified version of the Navier--Stokes--Fourier equations -- are effective in modeling slow and steady liquid flow past a sphere, they fail to yield a non-trivial solution to the problem of slow and steady liquid flow past a…
▽ More
The well-known Navier--Stokes--Fourier equations of fluid dynamics are, in general, not adequate for describing rarefied gas flows. Moreover, while the Stokes equations -- a simplified version of the Navier--Stokes--Fourier equations -- are effective in modeling slow and steady liquid flow past a sphere, they fail to yield a non-trivial solution to the problem of slow and steady liquid flow past an infinitely long cylinder (a two-dimensional problem essentially); this is referred to as Stokes' paradox. The paradox also arises when studying these problems for gases. In this paper, we present a way to obtain meaningful solutions for two-dimensional flows of rarefied gases around objects by circumventing Stokes' paradox. To this end, we adopt an extended hydrodynamic model, referred to as the CCR model, consisting of the balance equations for the mass, momentum and energy and closed with the coupled constitutive relations. We determine an analytic solution of the CCR model for the problem and compare it with a numerical solution based on the method of fundamental solutions. Apart from addressing flow past a circular cylinder, we aim to showcase the capabilities of the method of fundamental solutions to predict the flow past other objects in two dimensions for which analytic solutions do not exist or are difficult to determine. For that, we investigate the problem of rarefied gas flow past an infinitely long semicircular cylinder.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2025; v1 submitted 26 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
$H$-theorem and boundary conditions for the linear R26 equations: application to flow past an evaporating droplet
Authors:
Anirudh S. Rana,
Vinay Kumar Gupta,
James E. Sprittles,
Manuel Torrilhon
Abstract:
Determining physically admissible boundary conditions for higher moments in an extended continuum model is recognised as a major obstacle. Boundary conditions for the regularised 26-moment (R26) equations obtained using Maxwell's accommodation model do exist in the literature; however, we show in this article that these boundary conditions violate the second law of thermodynamics and the Onsager r…
▽ More
Determining physically admissible boundary conditions for higher moments in an extended continuum model is recognised as a major obstacle. Boundary conditions for the regularised 26-moment (R26) equations obtained using Maxwell's accommodation model do exist in the literature; however, we show in this article that these boundary conditions violate the second law of thermodynamics and the Onsager reciprocity relations for certain boundary value problems, and, hence, are not physically admissible. We further prove that the linearised R26 (LR26) equations possess a proper $H$-theorem (second-law inequality) by determining a quadratic form without cross-product terms for the entropy density. The establishment of the $H$-theorem for the LR26 equations in turn leads to a complete set of boundary conditions that are physically admissible for all processes and comply with the Onsager reciprocity relations. As an application, the problem of a slow rarefied gas flow past a spherical droplet with and without evaporation is considered and solved analytically. The results are compared with the numerical solution of the linearised Boltzmann equation, experimental results from the literature and/or other macroscopic theories to show that the LR26 theory with the physically admissible boundary conditions provides an excellent prediction up to Knudsen number $\,\lesssim 1$ and, consequently, provides transpicuous insights into intriguing effects, such as thermal polarisation. In particular, the analytic results for the drag force obtained in the present work are in an excellent agreement with experimental results even for very large values of the Knudsen number.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2021; v1 submitted 28 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
