Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Schoonderwoerd, N C J

Entanglement of Fock-space expansion and covariance in light-front Hamiltonian dynamics

Authors: N. C. J. Schoonderwoerd, B. L. G. Bakker, V. A. Karmanov

Abstract: We investigate in a model with scalar ``nucleons'' and mesons the contributions of higher Fock states that are neglected in the ladder approximation of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation. This leads to a breaking of covariance, both in light-front and in instant-form Hamiltonian dynamics. The lowest Fock sector neglected has two mesons in the intermediate state and corresponds to the stretched box.… ▽ More We investigate in a model with scalar ``nucleons'' and mesons the contributions of higher Fock states that are neglected in the ladder approximation of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation. This leads to a breaking of covariance, both in light-front and in instant-form Hamiltonian dynamics. The lowest Fock sector neglected has two mesons in the intermediate state and corresponds to the stretched box. First we show in a simplified example that the contributions of higher Fock states are much smaller on the light-front than in instant-form dynamics. Then we show for a scattering amplitude above threshold that the stretched boxes are small, however, necessary to retain covariance. For an off energy-shell amplitude covariance is not necessarily maintained and this is confirmed by our calculations. Again, the stretched boxes are found to be small. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 1998; originally announced June 1998.

Comments: 17 pages, revtex, 14 figures, submitted to Phys.Rev.C

Report number: VUTH 98-20

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.C58:3093-3108,1998

Equivalence of renormalized covariant and light-front perturbation theory: II. Transverse divergences in the Yukawa model

Authors: N. C. J. Schoonderwoerd, B. L. G. Bakker

Abstract: Light-front dynamics can only become a viable alternative to the covariant approach if doubts about its covariance can be taken away. As a minimal requirement we take that the physical quantities calculated with light-front perturbation theory are the same as those obtained using covariant perturbation theory. If this situation occurs, we use the word equivalent to characterize it. For quantitie… ▽ More Light-front dynamics can only become a viable alternative to the covariant approach if doubts about its covariance can be taken away. As a minimal requirement we take that the physical quantities calculated with light-front perturbation theory are the same as those obtained using covariant perturbation theory. If this situation occurs, we use the word equivalent to characterize it. For quantities that involve the calculation of superficially convergent diagrams, proofs of equivalence exist. For some types of divergent diagrams the proof of equivalence is complicated. Longitudinal divergences were dealt with in Part I. (hep-ph/9702311). In Part II we deal with diagrams with transverse divergences. Our method is based on minus regularization, which is inspired on BPHZ regularization. In a calculation using numerical methods we show how to obtain a rotationally invariant amplitude for two triangle diagrams contributing to the decay of a scalar boson in the Yukawa model. It concludes our proof of equivalence of covariant and light-front perturbation theory. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 1998; v1 submitted 29 January, 1998; originally announced January 1998.

Comments: 13 pages, revtex, epsf, 2 large figures, minor changes, accepted for publication in Phys.Rev.D

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.D58:025013,1998

Equivalence of renormalized covariant and light-front perturbation theory: I. Longitudinal divergences in the Yukawa model

Authors: N. C. J. Schoonderwoerd, B. L. G. Bakker

Abstract: Light-front perturbation theory has been proposed as an alternative to covariant perturbation theory. Light-front perturbation theory is only acceptable if it produces invariant S-matrix elements. Doubts have been raised concerning the equivalence of light-front and covariant perturbation theory. One of the obstacles to a rigorous proof of equivalence is the occurrence of longitudinal divergence… ▽ More Light-front perturbation theory has been proposed as an alternative to covariant perturbation theory. Light-front perturbation theory is only acceptable if it produces invariant S-matrix elements. Doubts have been raised concerning the equivalence of light-front and covariant perturbation theory. One of the obstacles to a rigorous proof of equivalence is the occurrence of longitudinal divergences not present in covariant perturbation theory. We show in the case of the Yukawa model of fermions interacting with scalar bosons at the one-loop level how to deal with the longitudinal divergences. Invariant S-matrix elements are obtained using our method. △ Less

Submitted 29 January, 1998; v1 submitted 12 February, 1997; originally announced February 1997.

Comments: 11 pages, epsf, revtex, contains more elaborate explanation of Forced Instantaneous Loops (FILs)

Report number: VUTH 97-4