-
On the Pipeline Dependence of DESI Dynamical Dark Energy
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari
Abstract:
We continue scientific scrutiny of the DESI dynamical dark energy (DE) claim by explicitly demonstrating that the result depends on the analysis pipeline. Concretely, we define a likelihood that converts the $w_0 w_a$CDM model back into the flat $Λ$CDM model, which we fit to DESI constraints on the flat $Λ$CDM model from DR1 Full-Shape (FS) modelling and BAO. We further incorporate CMB constraints…
▽ More
We continue scientific scrutiny of the DESI dynamical dark energy (DE) claim by explicitly demonstrating that the result depends on the analysis pipeline. Concretely, we define a likelihood that converts the $w_0 w_a$CDM model back into the flat $Λ$CDM model, which we fit to DESI constraints on the flat $Λ$CDM model from DR1 Full-Shape (FS) modelling and BAO. We further incorporate CMB constraints. Throughout, we find that $w_0$ and $w_a$ are within $1 σ$ of the flat $Λ$CDM Model. Our work makes it explicit that, in contrast to DR1 and DR2 BAO, there is no dynamical DE signal in FS modelling, even when combined with BAO and CMB. Moreover, one confirms late-time accelerated expansion today $(q_0 < 0)$ at $ \gtrsim 3.4 σ$ in FS modelling+BAO. On the contrary, DR1 and DR2 BAO fail to confirm $q_0 < 0$ under similar assumptions. Our analyses highlight the fact that trustable scientific results should be independent of the analysis pipeline.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
How much has DESI dark energy evolved since DR1?
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,
Lu Yin
Abstract:
DESI has reported a dynamical dark energy (DE) signal based on the $w_0 w_a$CDM model that is in conflict with Hubble tension. Recalling that the combination of DESI DR1 BAO and DR1 full-shape (FS) modeling are consistent with $Λ$CDM, in this letter we comment on the status of fluctuations in DR1 BAO documented in \cite{DESI:2024mwx, Colgain:2024xqj} in the DR2 update. In particular, we note that…
▽ More
DESI has reported a dynamical dark energy (DE) signal based on the $w_0 w_a$CDM model that is in conflict with Hubble tension. Recalling that the combination of DESI DR1 BAO and DR1 full-shape (FS) modeling are consistent with $Λ$CDM, in this letter we comment on the status of fluctuations in DR1 BAO documented in \cite{DESI:2024mwx, Colgain:2024xqj} in the DR2 update. In particular, we note that neither DR1 BAO nor DR2 BAO nor DR2 BAO+CMB confronted to the $w_0 w_a$CDM model with relaxed model parameter priors confirm late-time accelerated expansion today. Translating DESI BAO constraints into flat $Λ$CDM constraints, we observe that the LRG1 constraint remains the most prominent outlier, a distinction now held jointly with ELG1, LRG2 switches from smaller to larger $Ω_m$ values relative to Planck-$Λ$CDM, and ELG data drive the relatively low $Ω_m$ in the full DR2 BAO. We observe that one cannot restore $w_0 = -1$ within one $1 σ$ by removing either LRG1 or ELG1 or LRG2, but LRG2 in DR2, in contrast to LRG1 in DR1, now has the greatest bearing on $w_0 > -1$. We conclude that BAO has yet to stabilise, but the general trend is towards greater consistency with DESI DR1 FS modeling results, where there may be no dynamical DE signal in DESI data alone.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2025; v1 submitted 6 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Implications of DES 5YR SNe Dataset for $Λ$CDM
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari
Abstract:
Dark Energy Survey five-year supernovae data (DES 5YR SNe) in conjunction with Planck CMB and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) BAO data has detected a strong dynamical dark energy (DE) deviation from the $Λ$CDM model.Here we shift the focus of DES data to the pressureless matter sector in the $Λ$CDM model by studying the matter density parameter $Ω_m$. Employing primarily frequentist pr…
▽ More
Dark Energy Survey five-year supernovae data (DES 5YR SNe) in conjunction with Planck CMB and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) BAO data has detected a strong dynamical dark energy (DE) deviation from the $Λ$CDM model.Here we shift the focus of DES data to the pressureless matter sector in the $Λ$CDM model by studying the matter density parameter $Ω_m$. Employing primarily frequentist profile likelihoods, supported by complementary Bayesian methods, we demonstrate that $Ω_m$ increases with effective redshift in the DES data up to a point that there is a $2.5 σ$ discrepancy with Planck. We relax the traditional $Ω_m \leq 1$ prior to demonstrate negative DE densities $Ω_m > 1$ at the highest effective redshift probed. Nevertheless, the largest discrepancy with Planck occurs for profile likelihoods and posteriors peaked at $Ω_m < 1$ in the traditional $Λ$CDM regime. Our findings corroborate earlier observations in Pantheon and Pantheon+ datasets with an independent SNe dataset with a higher effective redshift. In an appendix, we confirm that curvature $Ω_k$ decreases with effective redshift disfavouring a flat Universe in higher redshift DES SNe at $> 3 σ$. Our choice of $Ω_k$ prior leads to an underestimation of the tension with a flat Universe.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2025; v1 submitted 10 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Does DESI 2024 Confirm $Λ$CDM?
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Maria Giovanna Dainotti,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,
Dejan Stojkovic
Abstract:
We demonstrate that a $\sim 2 σ$ discrepancy with the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology in DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ translates into an unexpectedly large $Ω_m$ value, $Ω_m = 0.668^{+0.180}_{-0.169}$. We independently confirm that this anomaly drives the preference for $w_0 > -1$ in DESI data confronted to the $w_0 w_a$CDM model. We show that redshift bins of DESI cons…
▽ More
We demonstrate that a $\sim 2 σ$ discrepancy with the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology in DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ translates into an unexpectedly large $Ω_m$ value, $Ω_m = 0.668^{+0.180}_{-0.169}$. We independently confirm that this anomaly drives the preference for $w_0 > -1$ in DESI data confronted to the $w_0 w_a$CDM model. We show that redshift bins of DESI constraints allow $Ω_m$ to wiggle at the $\sim 2 σ$ level with increasing effective redshift in the $Λ$CDM model. Given that LRG data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ is at odds with Type Ia supernovae in overlapping redshifts, we expect that this anomaly will decrease in statistical significance with future DESI data releases leaving an increasing $Ω_m$ trend with effective redshift at higher redshifts. We estimate the significance of the latter in DESI data at $\sim 1.8 σ$ and comment on how it dovetails with independent observations. It is imperative to understand what makes DESI LRG data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ an outlier when it comes to $Ω_m$ determinations.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2024; v1 submitted 12 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
$S_8$ increases with effective redshift in $Λ$CDM cosmology
Authors:
Shahnawaz A. Adil,
Özgür Akarsu,
Mohammad Malekjani,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
Anjan A. Sen,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari
Abstract:
Hubble constant $H_0$ and weighted amplitude of matter fluctuations $S_8$ determinations are biased to higher and lower values, respectively, in the late Universe with respect to early Universe values inferred by the Planck collaboration within flat $Λ$CDM cosmology. If these anomalies are physical, i.e. not due to systematics, they naively suggest that $H_0$ decreases and $S_8$ increases with eff…
▽ More
Hubble constant $H_0$ and weighted amplitude of matter fluctuations $S_8$ determinations are biased to higher and lower values, respectively, in the late Universe with respect to early Universe values inferred by the Planck collaboration within flat $Λ$CDM cosmology. If these anomalies are physical, i.e. not due to systematics, they naively suggest that $H_0$ decreases and $S_8$ increases with effective redshift. Here, subjecting matter density today $Ω_{m}$ to a prior, corresponding to a combination of Planck CMB and BAO data, we perform a consistency test of the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology and show that $S_8$ determinations from $f σ_8(z)$ constraints increase with effective redshift. Due to the redshift evolution, a $\sim 3 σ$ tension in the $S_8$ parameter with Planck at lower redshifts remarkably becomes consistent with Planck within $1 σ$ at high redshifts. This provides corroborating support for an $S_8$ discrepancy that is physical in origin. We further confirm that the flat $Λ$CDM model is preferred over a theoretically ad hoc model with a jump in $S_8$ at a given redshift. In the absence of the CMB+BAO $Ω_m$ prior, we find that $> 3 σ$ tensions with Planck in low redshift data are ameliorated by shifts in the parameters in high redshift data. Results here and elsewhere suggest that the $Λ$CDM cosmological parameters are redshift dependent. Fitting parameters that evolve with redshift is a recognisable hallmark of model breakdown.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 13 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
On Redshift Evolution & Negative Dark Energy Density in Pantheon+ Supernovae
Authors:
Mohammad Malekjani,
Ruairí Mc Conville,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari
Abstract:
Within the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) framework, the Hubble constant $H_0$ is an integration constant. Thus, consistency of the model demands observational constancy of $H_0$. We demonstrate redshift evolution of best fit $Λ$CDM parameters $(H_0, Ω_{m})$ in Pantheon+ supernove (SNe). Redshift evolution of best fit cosmological parameters is a prerequisite to finding a statistically…
▽ More
Within the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) framework, the Hubble constant $H_0$ is an integration constant. Thus, consistency of the model demands observational constancy of $H_0$. We demonstrate redshift evolution of best fit $Λ$CDM parameters $(H_0, Ω_{m})$ in Pantheon+ supernove (SNe). Redshift evolution of best fit cosmological parameters is a prerequisite to finding a statistically significant evolution as well as identifying alternative models that are competitive with $Λ$CDM in a Bayesian model comparison. To assess statistical significance, we employ three different methods: i) Bayesian model comparison, ii) mock simulations and iii) profile distributions. The first shows a marginal preference for the vanilla $Λ$CDM model over an ad hoc model with 3 additional parameters and an unphysical jump in cosmological parameters at $z=1$. From mock simulations, we estimate the statistical significance of redshift evolution of best fit parameters and negative dark energy density ($Ω_m > 1$) to be in the $1-2 σ$ range, depending on the criteria employed. Importantly, in direct comparison to the same analysis with the earlier Pantheon sample we find that statistical significance of redshift evolution of best fit parameters has increased, as expected for a physical effect. Our profile distribution analysis demonstrates a shift in $(H_0, Ω_m)$ in excess of $95\%$ confidence level for SNe with redshifts $z > 1$ and also shows that a degeneracy in MCMC posteriors is not equivalent to a curve of constant $χ^2$. Our findings can be interpreted as a statistical fluctuation or unexplored systematics in Pantheon+ or $Λ$CDM model breakdown. The first two possibilities are disfavoured by similar trends in independent probes.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2024; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
