-
Understanding the second quantization of fermions in Clifford and in Grassmann space -- New way of second quantization of fermions, Part I
Authors:
N. S. Mankoc Borstnik,
H. B. F. Nielsen
Abstract:
Both algebras, Clifford and Grassmann, offer "basis vectors" for describing the internal degrees of freedom of fermions. The oddness of the "basis vectors", transferred to the creation operators, which are tensor products of the finite number of "basis vectors" and the infinite number of momentum basis, and to their Hermitian conjugated partners annihilation operators, offers the second quantizati…
▽ More
Both algebras, Clifford and Grassmann, offer "basis vectors" for describing the internal degrees of freedom of fermions. The oddness of the "basis vectors", transferred to the creation operators, which are tensor products of the finite number of "basis vectors" and the infinite number of momentum basis, and to their Hermitian conjugated partners annihilation operators, offers the second quantization of fermions without postulating the conditions proposed by Dirac, enabling the explanation of the Dirac's postulates. But while the Clifford fermions manifest the half integer spins -- in agreement with the observed properties of quarks and leptons and antiquarks and antileptons -- the "Grassmann fermions" manifest the integer spins. In Part I properties of the creation and annihilation operators of integer spins "Grassmann fermions" are presented and the proposed equations of motion solved. The anticommutation relations of second quantized integer spin fermions are shown when applying on the vacuum state as well as when applying on the Hilbert space of the infinite number of "Slater determinants" with all the possibilities of empty and occupied "fermion states". In Part II the conditions are discussed under which the Clifford algebras offer the appearance of the second quantized fermions, enabling as well the appearance of families. In both parts, Part I and Part II, the relation between the Dirac way and our way of the second quantization of fermions is presented.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2020; v1 submitted 6 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Understanding the second quantization of fermions in Clifford and in Grassmann space -- New way of second quantization of fermions, Part II
Authors:
N. S. Mankoc Borstnik,
H. B. F. Nielsen
Abstract:
We present in Part II the description of the internal degrees of freedom of fermions by the superposition of odd products of the Clifford algebra elements, either $γ^a$'s or $\tildeγ^a$'s, which determine with their oddness the anticommuting properties of the creation and annihilation operators of the second quantized fermion fields in even $d$-dimensional space-time, as we do in Part I of this pa…
▽ More
We present in Part II the description of the internal degrees of freedom of fermions by the superposition of odd products of the Clifford algebra elements, either $γ^a$'s or $\tildeγ^a$'s, which determine with their oddness the anticommuting properties of the creation and annihilation operators of the second quantized fermion fields in even $d$-dimensional space-time, as we do in Part I of this paper by the Grassmann algebra elements $θ^a$'s and $\frac{\partial}{\partial θ_a}$'s. We discuss: {\bf i.} The properties of the two kinds of the odd Clifford algebras, forming two independent spaces, both expressible with the Grassmann algebra of $θ^{a}$'s and $\frac{\partial}{\partial θ_{a}}$'s. {\bf ii.} The freezing out procedure of one of the two kinds of the odd Clifford objects, enabling that the remaining Clifford objects determine with their oddness in the tensor products of the finite number of the Clifford basis vectors and the infinite number of momentum basis, the creation and annihilation operators carrying the family quantum numbers and fulfilling the anticommutation relations of the second quantized fermions: on the vacuum state, and on the whole Hilbert space defined by the sum of infinite number of "Slater determinants" of empty and occupied single fermion states. {\bf iii.} The relation between the second quantized fermions as postulated by Dirac and the ones following from our Clifford algebra creation and annihilation operators, what offers the explanation for the Dirac postulates.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2020; v1 submitted 6 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Fermionization, Number of Families
Authors:
N. S. Mankoc Borstnik,
H. B. F. Nielsen
Abstract:
We investigate bosonization/fermionization for free massless fermions being equivalent to free massless bosons with the purpose of checking and correcting the old rule by Aratyn and one of us (H.B.F.N.) for the number of boson species relative to the number of fermion species which is required to have bosonization possible. An important application of such a counting of degrees of freedom relation…
▽ More
We investigate bosonization/fermionization for free massless fermions being equivalent to free massless bosons with the purpose of checking and correcting the old rule by Aratyn and one of us (H.B.F.N.) for the number of boson species relative to the number of fermion species which is required to have bosonization possible. An important application of such a counting of degrees of freedom relation would be to invoke restrictions on the number of families that could be possible under the assumption, that all the fermions in nature are the result of fermionizing a system of boson species. Since a theory of fundamental fermions can be accused for not being properly local because of having anticommutativity at space like distances rather than commutation as is more physically reasonable to require, it is in fact called for to have all fermions arising from fermionization of bosons. To make a realistic scenario with the fermions all coming from fermionizing some bosons we should still have at least some not fermionized bosons and we are driven towards that being a gravitational field, that is not fermionized. Essentially we reach the spin-charge-families theory by one of us (N.S.M.B.) with the detail that the number of fermion components and therefore of families get determined from what possibilities for fermionization will finally turn out to exist. The spin-charge-family theory has long been plagued by predicting 4 families rather than the phenomenologically more favoured 3. Unfortunately we do not yet understand well enough the unphysical negative norm square components in the system of bosons that can fermionize in higher dimensions because we have no working high dimensional case of fermionization. But suspecting they involve gauge fields with complicated unphysical state systems the corrections from such states could putatively improve the family number prediction.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Degrees of freedom of massless boson and fermion fields in any even dimension
Authors:
N. S. Mankoc Borstnik,
H. B. F. Nielsen
Abstract:
This is a discussion on degrees of freedom of massless fermion and boson fields, if they are free or weakly interacting. We generalize the gauge fields of $S^{ab}$ - $ω_{abc}$ - and of $\tilde{S}^{ab}$ - $ \tildeω_{abc}$ - of the spin-charge-family to the gauge fields of all possible products of $γ^a$'s and of all possible products of $\tildeγ^a$'s, the first taking care in the {\it spin-charge-fa…
▽ More
This is a discussion on degrees of freedom of massless fermion and boson fields, if they are free or weakly interacting. We generalize the gauge fields of $S^{ab}$ - $ω_{abc}$ - and of $\tilde{S}^{ab}$ - $ \tildeω_{abc}$ - of the spin-charge-family to the gauge fields of all possible products of $γ^a$'s and of all possible products of $\tildeγ^a$'s, the first taking care in the {\it spin-charge-family} theory of the spins and charges quantum numbers ($τ^{Ai}=\sum_{a,b} c^{Ai}{}_{ab} \,S^{ab}$) of fermions, the second ($\tildeτ^{Ai}= \sum_{a,b} \tilde{c}^{Ai}{}_{ab}\, \tilde{S}^{ab}$) taking care of the families quantum numbers.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Fermionization in an Arbitrary Number of Dimensions
Authors:
N. S. Mankoc Borstnik,
H. B. F. Nielsen
Abstract:
One purpose of this proceedings-contribution is to show that at least for free massless particles it is possible to construct an explicit boson theory which is exactly equivalent in terms of momenta and energy to a fermion theory. The fermions come as $2^{d/2-1}$ families and the to this whole system of fermions corresponding bosons come as a whole series of the Kalb-Ramond fields, one set of comp…
▽ More
One purpose of this proceedings-contribution is to show that at least for free massless particles it is possible to construct an explicit boson theory which is exactly equivalent in terms of momenta and energy to a fermion theory. The fermions come as $2^{d/2-1}$ families and the to this whole system of fermions corresponding bosons come as a whole series of the Kalb-Ramond fields, one set of components for each number of indexes on the tensor fields.
Since Kalb-Ramond fields naturally (only) couple to the extended objects or branes, we suspect that inclusion of interaction into such for a bosonization prepared system - except for the lowest dimensions - without including branes or something like that is not likely to be possible.
The need for the families is easily seen just by using the theorem long ago put forward by Aratyn and one of us (H.B.F.N.), which says that to have the statistical mechanics of the fermion system and the boson system to match one needs to have the number of the field components in the ratio $\frac{2^{d-1}-1}{2^{d-1}}= \frac{\# bosons}{\# fermions}$, enforcing that the number of fermion components must be a multiple of $2^{d-1}$, where $d$ is the space-time dimension. This "explanation" of the number of dimension is potentially useful for the explanation for the number of dimension put forward by one of us (S.N.M.B.) since long in the spin-charge-family theory, and leads like the latter to typically (a multiple of) $4$ families.
And this is the second purpose for our work on the fermionization in an arbitrary number of dimensions - namely to learn how "natural" is the inclusion of the families in the way the spin-charge-family theory does.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Discrete symmetries in the Kaluza-Klein-like theories
Authors:
N. S. Mankoc Borstnik,
H. B. F. Nielsen
Abstract:
In theories of the Kaluza-Klein kind there are spins or total angular moments in higher dimensions which manifest as charges in the observable $d=(3+1)$. The charge conjugation requirement, if following the prescription in ($3+1$), would transform any particle state out of the Dirac sea into the hole in the Dirac sea, which manifests as an anti-particle having all the spin degrees of freedom in…
▽ More
In theories of the Kaluza-Klein kind there are spins or total angular moments in higher dimensions which manifest as charges in the observable $d=(3+1)$. The charge conjugation requirement, if following the prescription in ($3+1$), would transform any particle state out of the Dirac sea into the hole in the Dirac sea, which manifests as an anti-particle having all the spin degrees of freedom in $d$, except $S^{03}$, the same as the corresponding particle state. This is in contradiction with what we observe for the anti-particle. In this paper we redefine the discrete symmetries so that we stay within the subgroups of the starting group of symmetries, while we require that the angular moments in higher dimensions manifest as charges in $d=(3+1)$. We pay attention on spaces with even $d$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2014; v1 submitted 11 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
