-
JUNO Sensitivity on Proton Decay $p\to \barνK^+$ Searches
Authors:
JUNO Collaboration,
Angel Abusleme,
Thomas Adam,
Shakeel Ahmad,
Rizwan Ahmed,
Sebastiano Aiello,
Muhammad Akram,
Fengpeng An,
Qi An,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nikolay Anfimov,
Vito Antonelli,
Tatiana Antoshkina,
Burin Asavapibhop,
João Pedro Athayde Marcondes de André,
Didier Auguste,
Nikita Balashov,
Wander Baldini,
Andrea Barresi,
Davide Basilico,
Eric Baussan,
Marco Bellato,
Antonio Bergnoli,
Thilo Birkenfeld,
Sylvie Blin
, et al. (586 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a large liquid scintillator detector designed to explore many topics in fundamental physics. In this paper, the potential on searching for proton decay in $p\to \barνK^+$ mode with JUNO is investigated.The kaon and its decay particles feature a clear three-fold coincidence signature that results in a high efficiency for identification. Moreov…
▽ More
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) is a large liquid scintillator detector designed to explore many topics in fundamental physics. In this paper, the potential on searching for proton decay in $p\to \barνK^+$ mode with JUNO is investigated.The kaon and its decay particles feature a clear three-fold coincidence signature that results in a high efficiency for identification. Moreover, the excellent energy resolution of JUNO permits to suppress the sizable background caused by other delayed signals. Based on these advantages, the detection efficiency for the proton decay via $p\to \barνK^+$ is 36.9% with a background level of 0.2 events after 10 years of data taking. The estimated sensitivity based on 200 kton-years exposure is $9.6 \times 10^{33}$ years, competitive with the current best limits on the proton lifetime in this channel.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2023; v1 submitted 16 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Prospects for Detecting the Diffuse Supernova Neutrino Background with JUNO
Authors:
JUNO Collaboration,
Angel Abusleme,
Thomas Adam,
Shakeel Ahmad,
Rizwan Ahmed,
Sebastiano Aiello,
Muhammad Akram,
Fengpeng An,
Qi An,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nikolay Anfimov,
Vito Antonelli,
Tatiana Antoshkina,
Burin Asavapibhop,
João Pedro Athayde Marcondes de André,
Didier Auguste,
Nikita Balashov,
Wander Baldini,
Andrea Barresi,
Davide Basilico,
Eric Baussan,
Marco Bellato,
Antonio Bergnoli,
Thilo Birkenfeld,
Sylvie Blin
, et al. (577 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the detection potential for the diffuse supernova neutrino background (DSNB) at the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), using the inverse-beta-decay (IBD) detection channel on free protons. We employ the latest information on the DSNB flux predictions, and investigate in detail the background and its reduction for the DSNB search at JUNO. The atmospheric neutrino induced n…
▽ More
We present the detection potential for the diffuse supernova neutrino background (DSNB) at the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), using the inverse-beta-decay (IBD) detection channel on free protons. We employ the latest information on the DSNB flux predictions, and investigate in detail the background and its reduction for the DSNB search at JUNO. The atmospheric neutrino induced neutral current (NC) background turns out to be the most critical background, whose uncertainty is carefully evaluated from both the spread of model predictions and an envisaged \textit{in situ} measurement. We also make a careful study on the background suppression with the pulse shape discrimination (PSD) and triple coincidence (TC) cuts. With latest DSNB signal predictions, more realistic background evaluation and PSD efficiency optimization, and additional TC cut, JUNO can reach the significance of 3$σ$ for 3 years of data taking, and achieve better than 5$σ$ after 10 years for a reference DSNB model. In the pessimistic scenario of non-observation, JUNO would strongly improve the limits and exclude a significant region of the model parameter space.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2022; v1 submitted 18 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Damping signatures at JUNO, a medium-baseline reactor neutrino oscillation experiment
Authors:
JUNO collaboration,
Jun Wang,
Jiajun Liao,
Wei Wang,
Angel Abusleme,
Thomas Adam,
Shakeel Ahmad,
Rizwan Ahmed,
Sebastiano Aiello,
Muhammad Akram,
Fengpeng An,
Qi An,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nikolay Anfimov,
Vito Antonelli,
Tatiana Antoshkina,
Burin Asavapibhop,
João Pedro Athayde Marcondes de André,
Didier Auguste,
Andrej Babic,
Nikita Balashov,
Wander Baldini,
Andrea Barresi,
Davide Basilico,
Eric Baussan
, et al. (582 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We study damping signatures at the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), a medium-baseline reactor neutrino oscillation experiment. These damping signatures are motivated by various new physics models, including quantum decoherence, $ν_3$ decay, neutrino absorption, and wave packet decoherence. The phenomenological effects of these models can be characterized by exponential damping fac…
▽ More
We study damping signatures at the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO), a medium-baseline reactor neutrino oscillation experiment. These damping signatures are motivated by various new physics models, including quantum decoherence, $ν_3$ decay, neutrino absorption, and wave packet decoherence. The phenomenological effects of these models can be characterized by exponential damping factors at the probability level. We assess how well JUNO can constrain these damping parameters and how to disentangle these different damping signatures at JUNO. Compared to current experimental limits, JUNO can significantly improve the limits on $τ_3/m_3$ in the $ν_3$ decay model, the width of the neutrino wave packet $σ_x$, and the intrinsic relative dispersion of neutrino momentum $σ_{\rm rel}$.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2022; v1 submitted 29 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Model studies of V0 production ratios in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}}$ = 0.2, 0.9, and 7 TeV
Authors:
M. Ajaz,
M. U. Ashraf,
M. Waqas,
Z. Yasin,
A. M. Khubrani,
S. Hassan,
A. Haj Ismail,
L. L. Li
Abstract:
A comparative study of $V^0$ ratios has been performed between HIJING, Sibyll and QGSJET model-based event generators in this paper. The ratios under study are {\alam}/{\lam}, {\alam}/{\ks} and {\xim}/{\lam} as a function of rapidity $y$, rapidity loss ($Δy$) and {\ppt} from $pp$ collisions at \sqrts~= 0.2, 0.9, and 7 TeV and these simulations are then compared with the STAR and LHCb fiducial phas…
▽ More
A comparative study of $V^0$ ratios has been performed between HIJING, Sibyll and QGSJET model-based event generators in this paper. The ratios under study are {\alam}/{\lam}, {\alam}/{\ks} and {\xim}/{\lam} as a function of rapidity $y$, rapidity loss ($Δy$) and {\ppt} from $pp$ collisions at \sqrts~= 0.2, 0.9, and 7 TeV and these simulations are then compared with the STAR and LHCb fiducial phase spaces in different {\ppt} regions. Although the models could produce some of the ratios in a limited {\ppt} and/or $y$ region, none of them completely predicts the experimental results. The QGSJET has good predictions with the data in most of the cases but since the model does not include the $Ξ$ particle definition, therefore it does not give any predictions for $Ξ$/{\lam} ratios. The extrapolation to the highest possible energies can be studied by re-tune some of the basic parameters based on current and previous measurements. These kinds of systematic comparison studies are also useful to apply certain constraints on the pQCD and non-pQCD-based hadronic event generators to significantly improve the predictions of Standard Model physics at the RHIC and LHC experimental data for the understanding of underlying physics mechanisms in high energy collisions.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2022; v1 submitted 27 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Study of pT spectra of light particles using modified Hagedorn function and cosmic rays Monte Carlo event generators in proton-proton collisions at 900 GeV center of mass energy
Authors:
Muhammad Ajaz,
Muhammad Waqas,
Guang-Xiong Peng,
Zafar Yasin,
Hannan Younis,
Abd Al Karim Haj Ismai l
Abstract:
Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles including pions, kaons and (anti-)protons measured by ALICE experiment in the pT range of 0.1-2.5 GeV/c and pseudorapidity less than 0.5 are studied in pp collisions at 900 GeV center of mass energy using modified Hagedorn function with embedded transverse flow velocity and are compared to the predictions of EPOS-LHC, Pythia, QGSJET and Sibyll model…
▽ More
Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles including pions, kaons and (anti-)protons measured by ALICE experiment in the pT range of 0.1-2.5 GeV/c and pseudorapidity less than 0.5 are studied in pp collisions at 900 GeV center of mass energy using modified Hagedorn function with embedded transverse flow velocity and are compared to the predictions of EPOS-LHC, Pythia, QGSJET and Sibyll models. We find that the average transverse flow velocity decreases with increasing the mass of the particle while the kinetic freeze-out temperature extracted from the function increases with the particle's mass. The former varies from 0.36 c to 0.25 c for pions to protons while the latter from 76 MeV to 95 MeV respectively. The fit of the models predictions also yield the same values for T0 and beta as the experimental data. The only difference is in the values of n, and N0 which yields different values for different models. The EPOS-LHC, Pythia, and QGSJET models reproduce the data in most of the pT range for pions, EPOS-LHC and Sibyll for kaons up to 1.5 GeV/c and EPOS-LHC for protons up to 1.6 GeV/c. The model simulations also reproduced the behavior of increasing average transverse momentum with mass reported by the ALICE experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Feasibility and physics potential of detecting $^8$B solar neutrinos at JUNO
Authors:
JUNO collaboration,
Angel Abusleme,
Thomas Adam,
Shakeel Ahmad,
Sebastiano Aiello,
Muhammad Akram,
Nawab Ali,
Fengpeng An,
Guangpeng An,
Qi An,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nikolay Anfimov,
Vito Antonelli,
Tatiana Antoshkina,
Burin Asavapibhop,
João Pedro Athayde Marcondes de André,
Didier Auguste,
Andrej Babic,
Wander Baldini,
Andrea Barresi,
Eric Baussan,
Marco Bellato,
Antonio Bergnoli,
Enrico Bernieri,
David Biare
, et al. (572 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory~(JUNO) features a 20~kt multi-purpose underground liquid scintillator sphere as its main detector. Some of JUNO's features make it an excellent experiment for $^8$B solar neutrino measurements, such as its low-energy threshold, its high energy resolution compared to water Cherenkov detectors, and its much large target mass compared to previous liquid s…
▽ More
The Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory~(JUNO) features a 20~kt multi-purpose underground liquid scintillator sphere as its main detector. Some of JUNO's features make it an excellent experiment for $^8$B solar neutrino measurements, such as its low-energy threshold, its high energy resolution compared to water Cherenkov detectors, and its much large target mass compared to previous liquid scintillator detectors. In this paper we present a comprehensive assessment of JUNO's potential for detecting $^8$B solar neutrinos via the neutrino-electron elastic scattering process. A reduced 2~MeV threshold on the recoil electron energy is found to be achievable assuming the intrinsic radioactive background $^{238}$U and $^{232}$Th in the liquid scintillator can be controlled to 10$^{-17}$~g/g. With ten years of data taking, about 60,000 signal and 30,000 background events are expected. This large sample will enable an examination of the distortion of the recoil electron spectrum that is dominated by the neutrino flavor transformation in the dense solar matter, which will shed new light on the tension between the measured electron spectra and the predictions of the standard three-flavor neutrino oscillation framework. If $Δm^{2}_{21}=4.8\times10^{-5}~(7.5\times10^{-5})$~eV$^{2}$, JUNO can provide evidence of neutrino oscillation in the Earth at the about 3$σ$~(2$σ$) level by measuring the non-zero signal rate variation with respect to the solar zenith angle. Moveover, JUNO can simultaneously measure $Δm^2_{21}$ using $^8$B solar neutrinos to a precision of 20\% or better depending on the central value and to sub-percent precision using reactor antineutrinos. A comparison of these two measurements from the same detector will help elucidate the current tension between the value of $Δm^2_{21}$ reported by solar neutrino experiments and the KamLAND experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
The Physics of the B Factories
Authors:
A. J. Bevan,
B. Golob,
Th. Mannel,
S. Prell,
B. D. Yabsley,
K. Abe,
H. Aihara,
F. Anulli,
N. Arnaud,
T. Aushev,
M. Beneke,
J. Beringer,
F. Bianchi,
I. I. Bigi,
M. Bona,
N. Brambilla,
J. B rodzicka,
P. Chang,
M. J. Charles,
C. H. Cheng,
H. -Y. Cheng,
R. Chistov,
P. Colangelo,
J. P. Coleman,
A. Drutskoy
, et al. (2009 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work is on the Physics of the B Factories. Part A of this book contains a brief description of the SLAC and KEK B Factories as well as their detectors, BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues. Part B discusses tools and methods used by the experiments in order to obtain results. The results themselves can be found in Part C.
Please note that version 3 on the archive is the auxiliary…
▽ More
This work is on the Physics of the B Factories. Part A of this book contains a brief description of the SLAC and KEK B Factories as well as their detectors, BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues. Part B discusses tools and methods used by the experiments in order to obtain results. The results themselves can be found in Part C.
Please note that version 3 on the archive is the auxiliary version of the Physics of the B Factories book. This uses the notation alpha, beta, gamma for the angles of the Unitarity Triangle. The nominal version uses the notation phi_1, phi_2 and phi_3. Please cite this work as Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 3026.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2015; v1 submitted 24 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
