-
A frequentist view on the two-body decaying dark matter model
Authors:
Thomas Montandon,
Elsa M. Teixeira,
Adèle Poudou,
Vivian Poulin
Abstract:
Decaying dark matter (DDM) has emerged as an interesting framework to extend the Lambda-cold-dark-matter (LCDM) model, as many particle physics models predict that dark matter may not be stable over cosmic time and can impact structure formation. In particular, a model in which DM decays at a rate $Γ$ and imprints a velocity kick $v$ onto its decay products leads to a low amplitude of fluctuations…
▽ More
Decaying dark matter (DDM) has emerged as an interesting framework to extend the Lambda-cold-dark-matter (LCDM) model, as many particle physics models predict that dark matter may not be stable over cosmic time and can impact structure formation. In particular, a model in which DM decays at a rate $Γ$ and imprints a velocity kick $v$ onto its decay products leads to a low amplitude of fluctuations, as quantified by the parameter $S_8$, in better agreement with that measured by some past weak lensing surveys. Bayesian analyses have provided mixed conclusions regarding its viability, with a reconstructed clustering amplitude only slightly below the standard LCDM value. In this paper, we perform a frequentist analysis of Planck+BAO data. We find $1σ$ constraints on the half-life of $6.93^{+7.88}_{-2.85}$Gyr and a velocity kick of $1250^{+1450}_{-1000}$km/s which differ from their Bayesian counterparts, indicating the presence of volume effects. Moreover, we find that under the DDM model, the frequentist analysis predicts lower values of $S_8$, in agreement with those found by KiDS-1000 and DES-Y3 at $1.5σ$. We further show that previously derived KiDS-1000 constraints that appeared to exclude the best-fit model from Planck data were driven by priors on the primordial parameters $A_s$ and $n_s$. When those are removed from the analysis, KiDS-1000 constraints on the DDM parameters are fully relaxed. It is only when applying Planck-informed priors on $A_s$ and $n_s$ to the KiDS-1000 analysis that one can constrain the model. We further highlight that in the absence of such priors, the region of scales best-measured by KiDS-1000 does not exactly match the $S_8$ kernel, but rather a slightly smaller range of scales centered around $k\sim 0.3\, h/$Mpc. One must thus be careful in applying $S_8$ constraints to a model instead of the full data likelihood.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Jackson Levi Said,
Adam Riess,
Agnieszka Pollo,
Vivian Poulin,
Adrià Gómez-Valent,
Amanda Weltman,
Antonella Palmese,
Caroline D. Huang,
Carsten van de Bruck,
Chandra Shekhar Saraf,
Cheng-Yu Kuo,
Cora Uhlemann,
Daniela Grandón,
Dante Paz,
Dominique Eckert,
Elsa M. Teixeira,
Emmanuel N. Saridakis,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Florian Beutler,
Florian Niedermann,
Francesco Bajardi,
Gabriela Barenboim,
Giulia Gubitosi,
Ilaria Musella
, et al. (513 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The standard model of cosmology has provided a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations both at astrophysical and cosmological scales for several decades. This concordance model is constructed by a universal cosmological constant and supported by a matter sector described by the standard model of particle physics and a cold dark matter contribution, as well as very early-t…
▽ More
The standard model of cosmology has provided a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations both at astrophysical and cosmological scales for several decades. This concordance model is constructed by a universal cosmological constant and supported by a matter sector described by the standard model of particle physics and a cold dark matter contribution, as well as very early-time inflationary physics, and underpinned by gravitation through general relativity. There have always been open questions about the soundness of the foundations of the standard model. However, recent years have shown that there may also be questions from the observational sector with the emergence of differences between certain cosmological probes. In this White Paper, we identify the key objectives that need to be addressed over the coming decade together with the core science projects that aim to meet these challenges. These discordances primarily rest on the divergence in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence. These possible statistical tensions may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model. After reviewing the principal probes used in the measurement of cosmological parameters, as well as potential systematics, we discuss the most promising array of potential new physics that may be observable in upcoming surveys. We also discuss the growing set of novel data analysis approaches that go beyond traditional methods to test physical models. [Abridged]
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2025; v1 submitted 2 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Self-interacting neutrinos in light of recent CMB and LSS data
Authors:
Adèle Poudou,
Théo Simon,
Thomas Montandon,
Elsa M. Teixeira,
Vivian Poulin
Abstract:
We update constraints on a simple model of self-interacting neutrinos involving a heavy scalar mediator with universal flavor coupling. According to past literature, such a model is allowed by Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, with some CMB and large-scale structure data even favoring a strongly-interacting neutrino (SI$ν$) scenario over $Λ$CDM. In this work, we re-evaluate the constraints o…
▽ More
We update constraints on a simple model of self-interacting neutrinos involving a heavy scalar mediator with universal flavor coupling. According to past literature, such a model is allowed by Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, with some CMB and large-scale structure data even favoring a strongly-interacting neutrino (SI$ν$) scenario over $Λ$CDM. In this work, we re-evaluate the constraints on this model in light of the new Planck NPIPE data, DESI BAO data, and the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures (EFTofLSS) applied to BOSS data. We find that Planck NPIPE are more permissive to the SI$ν$ scenario and that DESI data favor the SI$ν$ over $Λ$CDM. However, when considering EFTofBOSS data, this mode is no longer preferred. Therefore, new DESI data analyzed under the EFTofLSS are particularly awaited to shed light on this disagreement.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Scalar field dark matter with time-varying equation of state
Authors:
Gaspard Poulot,
Elsa M. Teixeira,
Carsten van de Bruck,
Nelson J. Nunes
Abstract:
We propose a new model of scalar field dark matter interacting with dark energy. Adopting a fluid description of the dark matter field in the regime of rapid oscillations, we find that the equation of state for dark matter is non-zero and even becomes increasingly negative at late times during dark energy domination. Furthermore, the speed of sound of dark matter is non-vanishing at all length sca…
▽ More
We propose a new model of scalar field dark matter interacting with dark energy. Adopting a fluid description of the dark matter field in the regime of rapid oscillations, we find that the equation of state for dark matter is non-zero and even becomes increasingly negative at late times during dark energy domination. Furthermore, the speed of sound of dark matter is non-vanishing at all length scales, and a non-adiabatic pressure contribution arises. The results indicate that there are still unexplored possible interactions within the dark sector that lead to novel background effects and can impact structure formation processes.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Scalar field dark matter and dark energy: a hybrid model for the dark sector
Authors:
Carsten van de Bruck,
Gaspard Poulot,
Elsa M. Teixeira
Abstract:
Diverse cosmological and astrophysical observations strongly hint at the presence of dark matter and dark energy in the Universe. One of the main goals of Cosmology is to explain the nature of these two components. It may well be that both dark matter and dark energy have a common origin. In this paper, we develop a model in which the dark sector arises due to an interplay between two interacting…
▽ More
Diverse cosmological and astrophysical observations strongly hint at the presence of dark matter and dark energy in the Universe. One of the main goals of Cosmology is to explain the nature of these two components. It may well be that both dark matter and dark energy have a common origin. In this paper, we develop a model in which the dark sector arises due to an interplay between two interacting scalar fields. Employing a hybrid inflation potential, we show that the model can be described as a system of a pressureless fluid coupled to a light scalar field. We discuss this setup's cosmological consequences and the observational signatures in the cosmic microwave background radiation and the large-scale structures.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2023; v1 submitted 24 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
Authors:
Elcio Abdalla,
Guillermo Franco Abellán,
Amin Aboubrahim,
Adriano Agnello,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yashar Akrami,
George Alestas,
Daniel Aloni,
Luca Amendola,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Richard I. Anderson,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Vernon Barger,
Spyros Basilakos,
Ronaldo C. Batista,
Elia S. Battistelli,
Richard Battye,
Micol Benetti,
David Benisty,
Asher Berlin,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Emanuele Berti,
Bohdan Bidenko
, et al. (178 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of system…
▽ More
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the $5.0\,σ$ tension between the {\it Planck} CMB estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the {\it Planck} CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $Ω_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($σ_8,fσ_8$). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the $H_0$--$S_8$ tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals.[Abridged]
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2022; v1 submitted 11 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
