Skip to main content

Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Smith, R N

Searching in archive hep-ph. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2109.03261  [pdf, other

    astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO hep-ph

    New constraints on light Axion-Like Particles using Chandra Transmission Grating Spectroscopy of the powerful cluster-hosted quasar H1821+643

    Authors: Júlia Sisk Reynés, James H. Matthews, Christopher S. Reynolds, Helen R. Russell, Robyn N. Smith, M. C. David Marsh

    Abstract: Axion-Like Particles (ALPs) are predicted by several Beyond the Standard Model theories, in particular, string theory. In the presence of an external magnetic field perpendicular to the direction of propagation, ALPs can couple to photons. Therefore, if an X-ray source is viewed through a magnetised plasma, such as a luminous quasar in a galaxy cluster, we may expect spectral distortions that are… ▽ More

    Submitted 25 November, 2021; v1 submitted 7 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

    Comments: 14 pages, 7 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS on 24th November 2021. Comments welcome

  2. arXiv:1907.05475  [pdf, other

    hep-ph astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HE

    Astrophysical limits on very light axion-like particles from Chandra grating spectroscopy of NGC 1275

    Authors: Christopher S. Reynolds, M. C. David Marsh, Helen R. Russell, Andrew C. Fabian, Robyn N. Smith, Francesco Tombesi, Sylvain Veilleux

    Abstract: Axions/axion-like particles (ALPs) are a well motivated extension of the Standard Model and are generic within String Theory. The X-ray transparency of the intracluster medium (ICM) in galaxy clusters is a powerful probe of light ALPs (with mass $<10^{-11}\,{\rm eV}$); as X-ray photons from an embedded or background source propagate through the magnetized ICM, they may undergo energy-dependent qua… ▽ More

    Submitted 18 December, 2020; v1 submitted 11 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

    Comments: Published in The Astrophysical Journal, 2020, vol 890, pp59. This posting corrects typos in equation (2) and the likelihood function just prior to equation (3). Typos were introduced into the draft at late stage and the analysis is correct