-
Significant Excess of ElectronLike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiment
Authors:
MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
J. M. Conrad,
R. L. Cooper,
R. Dharmapalan,
A. Diaz,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
E. -C. Huang,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh
, et al. (23 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $ν_e$ appearance data from $12.84 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over previously reported results. A $ν_e$ charged-current quasielastic event excess of $381.2 \pm 85.2$ events ($4.5 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$~MeV. Combining these da…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $ν_e$ appearance data from $12.84 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over previously reported results. A $ν_e$ charged-current quasielastic event excess of $381.2 \pm 85.2$ events ($4.5 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$~MeV. Combining these data with the $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, a total $ν_e$ plus $\bar ν_e$ charged-current quasielastic event excess of $460.5 \pm 99.0$ events ($4.7 σ$) is observed. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, $ν_μ \rightarrow ν_e$, the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of $21.1\%$, while the background-only fit has a $χ^2$ probability of $6 \times 10^{-7}$ relative to the best fit. The MiniBooNE data are consistent in energy and magnitude with the excess of events reported by the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), and the significance of the combined LSND and MiniBooNE excesses is $6.0 σ$. A two-neutrino oscillation interpretation of the data would require at least four neutrino types and indicate physics beyond the three neutrino paradigm.Although the data are fit with a two-neutrino oscillation model, other models may provide better fits to the data.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2018; v1 submitted 30 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
First Measurement of Monoenergetic Muon Neutrino Charged Current Interactions
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. L. Cooper,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. S. Fitzpatrick,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
J. R. Jordan,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
K. Mahn
, et al. (24 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report the first measurement of monoenergetic muon neutrino charged current interactions. MiniBooNE has isolated 236 MeV muon neutrino events originating from charged kaon decay at rest ($K^+ \rightarrow μ^+ ν_μ$) at the NuMI beamline absorber. These signal $ν_μ$-carbon events are distinguished from primarily pion decay in flight $ν_μ$ and $\overlineν_μ$ backgrounds produced at the target stati…
▽ More
We report the first measurement of monoenergetic muon neutrino charged current interactions. MiniBooNE has isolated 236 MeV muon neutrino events originating from charged kaon decay at rest ($K^+ \rightarrow μ^+ ν_μ$) at the NuMI beamline absorber. These signal $ν_μ$-carbon events are distinguished from primarily pion decay in flight $ν_μ$ and $\overlineν_μ$ backgrounds produced at the target station and decay pipe using their arrival time and reconstructed muon energy. The significance of the signal observation is at the 3.9$σ$ level. The muon kinetic energy, neutrino-nucleus energy transfer ($ω=E_ν-E_μ$), and total cross section for these events is extracted. This result is the first known-energy, weak-interaction-only probe of the nucleus to yield a measurement of $ω$ using neutrinos, a quantity thus far only accessible through electron scattering.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2018; v1 submitted 11 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Using L/E Oscillation Probability Distributions
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills,
J. Mirabal
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper explores the use of $L/E$ oscillation probability distributions to compare experimental measurements and to evaluate oscillation models. In this case, $L$ is the distance of neutrino travel and $E$ is a measure of the interacting neutrino's energy. While comparisons using allowed and excluded regions for oscillation model parameters are likely the only rigorous method for these comparis…
▽ More
This paper explores the use of $L/E$ oscillation probability distributions to compare experimental measurements and to evaluate oscillation models. In this case, $L$ is the distance of neutrino travel and $E$ is a measure of the interacting neutrino's energy. While comparisons using allowed and excluded regions for oscillation model parameters are likely the only rigorous method for these comparisons, the $L/E$ distributions are shown to give qualitative information on the agreement of an experiment's data with a simple two-neutrino oscillation model. In more detail, this paper also outlines how the $L/E$ distributions can be best calculated and used for model comparisons. Specifically, the paper presents the $L/E$ data points for the final MiniBooNE data samples and, in the Appendix, explains and corrects the mistaken analysis published by the ICARUS collaboration.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
The OscSNS White Paper
Authors:
OscSNS Collaboration,
R. Allen,
F. T. Avignone,
J. Boissevain,
Y. Efremenko,
M. Elnimr,
T. Gabriel,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
T. Handler,
W. Huelsnitz,
R. Imlay,
Y. Kamyshkov,
J. M. Link,
W. C. Louis,
G. B. Mills,
S. R. Mishra,
B. Osmanov,
Z. Pavlovic,
H. Ray,
B. P. Roe,
C. Rosenfeld,
I. Stancu,
R. Svoboda,
R. Tayloe
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
There exists a need to address and resolve the growing evidence for short-baseline neutrino oscillations and the possible existence of sterile neutrinos. Such non-standard particles require a mass of $\sim 1$ eV/c$^2$, far above the mass scale associated with active neutrinos, and were first invoked to explain the LSND $\bar ν_μ\rightarrow \bar ν_e$ appearance signal. More recently, the MiniBooNE…
▽ More
There exists a need to address and resolve the growing evidence for short-baseline neutrino oscillations and the possible existence of sterile neutrinos. Such non-standard particles require a mass of $\sim 1$ eV/c$^2$, far above the mass scale associated with active neutrinos, and were first invoked to explain the LSND $\bar ν_μ\rightarrow \bar ν_e$ appearance signal. More recently, the MiniBooNE experiment has reported a $2.8 σ$ excess of events in antineutrino mode consistent with neutrino oscillations and with the LSND antineutrino appearance signal. MiniBooNE also observed a $3.4 σ$ excess of events in their neutrino mode data. Lower than expected neutrino-induced event rates using calibrated radioactive sources and nuclear reactors can also be explained by the existence of sterile neutrinos. Fits to the world's neutrino and antineutrino data are consistent with sterile neutrinos at this $\sim 1$ eV/c$^2$ mass scale, although there is some tension between measurements from disappearance and appearance experiments. In addition to resolving this potential major extension of the Standard Model, the existence of sterile neutrinos will impact design and planning for all future neutrino experiments. It should be an extremely high priority to conclusively establish if such unexpected light sterile neutrinos exist. The Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, built to usher in a new era in neutron research, provides a unique opportunity for US science to perform a definitive world-class search for sterile neutrinos.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2013; v1 submitted 26 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
-
Improved Search for $\bar ν_μ\rightarrow \bar ν_e$ Oscillations in the MiniBooNE Experiment
Authors:
The MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over the previously reported results. An event excess of $78.4 \pm 28.5$ events ($2.8 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscilla…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over the previously reported results. An event excess of $78.4 \pm 28.5$ events ($2.8 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, $\barν_μ\rightarrow\barν_e$, the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of 66% while the background-only fit has a $χ^2$-probability of 0.5% relative to the best fit. The data are consistent with antineutrino oscillations in the $0.01 < Δm^2 < 1.0$ eV$^2$ range and have some overlap with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND). All of the major backgrounds are constrained by in-situ event measurements so non-oscillation explanations would need to invoke new anomalous background processes. The neutrino mode running also shows an excess at low energy of $162.0 \pm 47.8$ events ($3.4 σ$) but the energy distribution of the excess is marginally compatible with a simple two neutrino oscillation formalism. Expanded models with several sterile neutrinos can reduce the incompatibility by allowing for CP violating effects between neutrino and antineutrino oscillations.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2013; v1 submitted 11 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
A Combined $ν_μ\to ν_e$ and $\barν_μ\to \barν_e$ Oscillation Analysis of the MiniBooNE Excesses
Authors:
MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of the combined $ν_e$ and $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $6.46 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode. A total excess of $240.3 \pm 34.5 \pm 52.6$ events ($3.8 σ$) is observed from combining the two data sets in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ Me…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of the combined $ν_e$ and $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $6.46 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode. A total excess of $240.3 \pm 34.5 \pm 52.6$ events ($3.8 σ$) is observed from combining the two data sets in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. In a combined fit for CP-conserving $ν_μ\rightarrow ν_e$ and $\barν_μ\rightarrow\barν_e$ oscillations via a two-neutrino model, the background-only fit has a $χ^2$-probability of 0.03% relative to the best oscillation fit. The data are consistent with neutrino oscillations in the $0.01 < Δm^2 < 1.0$ eV$^2$ range and with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND).
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2012; v1 submitted 19 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Test of Lorentz and CPT violation with Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Excesses
Authors:
The MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
C. E. Anderson,
A. O. Bazarko,
S. J. Brice,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
J. Cao,
L. Coney,
J. M. Conrad,
D. C. Cox,
A. Curioni,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
B. T. Fleming,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
C. Green,
J. A. Green,
T. L. Hart,
E. Hawker,
W. Huelsnitz
, et al. (63 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The sidereal time dependence of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and anti-electron neutrino appearance data are analyzed to search for evidence of Lorentz and CPT violation. An unbinned Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows both the electron neutrino and anti-electron neutrino appearance data are compatible with the null sidereal variation hypothesis to more than 5%. Using an unbinned likelihood fit with a Lor…
▽ More
The sidereal time dependence of MiniBooNE electron neutrino and anti-electron neutrino appearance data are analyzed to search for evidence of Lorentz and CPT violation. An unbinned Kolmogorov-Smirnov test shows both the electron neutrino and anti-electron neutrino appearance data are compatible with the null sidereal variation hypothesis to more than 5%. Using an unbinned likelihood fit with a Lorentz-violating oscillation model derived from the Standard Model Extension (SME) to describe any excess events over background, we find that the electron neutrino appearance data prefer a sidereal time-independent solution, and the anti-electron neutrino appearance data slightly prefer a sidereal time-dependent solution. Limits of order 10E-20 GeV are placed on combinations of SME coefficients. These limits give the best limits on certain SME coefficients for muon neutrino to electron neutrino and anti-muon neutrino to anti-electron neutrino oscillations. The fit values and limits of combinations of SME coefficients are provided.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2012; v1 submitted 15 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
