Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Nielsen, H B F

Small Representation Principle

Authors: H. B. F. Nielsen

Abstract: In a previous article Don Bennett and I looked for, found and proposed a game in which the Standard Model Gauge Group $S(U(2) \times U(3))$ gets singled out as the "winner". This "game" means that the by Nature chosen gauge group should be just that one, which has the maximal value for a quantity, which is a modification of the ratio of the quadratic Casimir for the adjoint representation and that… ▽ More In a previous article Don Bennett and I looked for, found and proposed a game in which the Standard Model Gauge Group $S(U(2) \times U(3))$ gets singled out as the "winner". This "game" means that the by Nature chosen gauge group should be just that one, which has the maximal value for a quantity, which is a modification of the ratio of the quadratic Casimir for the adjoint representation and that for a "smallest" faithful representation. In a recent article I proposed to extend this "game" to construct a corresponding game between different potential dimensions for space-time. The idea is to formulate, how the same competition as the one between the potential gauge groups would run out, if restricted to the potential Lorentz or Poincare groups achievable for different dimensions of space-time $d$. The remarkable point is, that it is the experimental space-time dimension 4, which wins. It follows that the whole Standard Model is specified by requiring SMALLEST REPRESENTATIONS! Speculatively we even argue that our principle found suggests the group of gauge transformations and some manifold(suggestive of say general relativity). △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2014; originally announced March 2014.

Comments: Appeared in Proceedings to the 16th Workshop "What Comes Beyond the Standard Models?", Bled 14-21 of July 2013, Vol. 14, No. 2, DMFA Zaloznistvo, Ljubljana, Dec. 2013

Proceedings to the 14th International Workshop "What Comes Beyond the Standard Models", July 11-21, 2011, Bled, Slovenia

Authors: N. S. Mankoc Borstnik, H. B. F. Nielsen, M. Y. Khlopov, D. Lukman

Abstract: The contribution contains the preface to the Proceedings to the 14th Workshop What Comes Beyond the Standard Models, Bled, July 11 - 21, 2011, published in Bled workshops in physics, Vol.12, No. 2, DMFA-Zaloznistvo, Ljubljana, Dec. 2011, and links to the published contributions. The contribution contains the preface to the Proceedings to the 14th Workshop What Comes Beyond the Standard Models, Bled, July 11 - 21, 2011, published in Bled workshops in physics, Vol.12, No. 2, DMFA-Zaloznistvo, Ljubljana, Dec. 2011, and links to the published contributions. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2014; v1 submitted 10 September, 2013; originally announced September 2013.

Comments: One article reference fixed (transposed digits in arXiv number); "Bled Workshops in Physics", Vol. 12, No.2, DMFA Zaloznistvo, Ljubljana, December 2011

Discrete symmetries in the Kaluza-Klein-like theories

Authors: N. S. Mankoc Borstnik, H. B. F. Nielsen

Abstract: In theories of the Kaluza-Klein kind there are spins or total angular moments in higher dimensions which manifest as charges in the observable $d=(3+1)$. The charge conjugation requirement, if following the prescription in ($3+1$), would transform any particle state out of the Dirac sea into the hole in the Dirac sea, which manifests as an anti-particle having all the spin degrees of freedom in… ▽ More In theories of the Kaluza-Klein kind there are spins or total angular moments in higher dimensions which manifest as charges in the observable $d=(3+1)$. The charge conjugation requirement, if following the prescription in ($3+1$), would transform any particle state out of the Dirac sea into the hole in the Dirac sea, which manifests as an anti-particle having all the spin degrees of freedom in $d$, except $S^{03}$, the same as the corresponding particle state. This is in contradiction with what we observe for the anti-particle. In this paper we redefine the discrete symmetries so that we stay within the subgroups of the starting group of symmetries, while we require that the angular moments in higher dimensions manifest as charges in $d=(3+1)$. We pay attention on spaces with even $d$. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2014; v1 submitted 11 December, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

Comments: 34 pages, improved and corrected version

Journal ref: JHEP04(2014)165