Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Montgomery, H E

Statement from the American Linear Collider Committee to the P5 subpanel

Authors: J. A. Bagger, S. Belomestnykh, P. C. Bhat, J. E. Brau, M. Demarteau, D. Denisov, S. Gori, P. D. Grannis, T. Junginger, A. J. Lankford, M. Liepe, T. W. Markiewicz, H. E. Montgomery, M. Perelstein, M. E. Peskin, J. Strube, A. P. White, G. W. Wilson

Abstract: This statement from the American Linear Collider Committee to the P5 subpanel has three purposes. It presents a brief summary of the case for an $e^+e^-$ Higgs factory that has emerged from Snowmass 2021. It highlights the special virtues of the ILC that are shared with other linear colliders but not with circular colliders. Finally, it calls attention to the resources available in the ILC White P… ▽ More This statement from the American Linear Collider Committee to the P5 subpanel has three purposes. It presents a brief summary of the case for an $e^+e^-$ Higgs factory that has emerged from Snowmass 2021. It highlights the special virtues of the ILC that are shared with other linear colliders but not with circular colliders. Finally, it calls attention to the resources available in the ILC White Paper for Snowmass (arXiv:2203.07622). The ALCC urges P5 to move the Higgs factory forward as a global project by assigning the idea of an $e^+e^-$ Higgs factory high priority, initiating a global discussion of the technology choice and cost sharing, and offering the option of siting the Higgs factory in the U.S. △ Less

Submitted 17 May, 2023; v1 submitted 20 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: 6 pages

Motivation for Two Detectors at a Particle Physics Collider

Authors: Paul D. Grannis, Hugh E. Montgomery

Abstract: It is generally accepted that it is preferable to build two general purpose detectors at any given collider facility. We reinforce this point by discussing a number of aspects and particular instances in which this has been important. The examples are taken mainly, but not exclusively, from experience at the Tevatron collider. It is generally accepted that it is preferable to build two general purpose detectors at any given collider facility. We reinforce this point by discussing a number of aspects and particular instances in which this has been important. The examples are taken mainly, but not exclusively, from experience at the Tevatron collider. △ Less

Submitted 24 March, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: 12 pages, 11 figures

Report number: JLAB-PHY-23-3761

The International Linear Collider: Report to Snowmass 2021

Authors: Alexander Aryshev, Ties Behnke, Mikael Berggren, James Brau, Nathaniel Craig, Ayres Freitas, Frank Gaede, Spencer Gessner, Stefania Gori, Christophe Grojean, Sven Heinemeyer, Daniel Jeans, Katja Kruger, Benno List, Jenny List, Zhen Liu, Shinichiro Michizono, David W. Miller, Ian Moult, Hitoshi Murayama, Tatsuya Nakada, Emilio Nanni, Mihoko Nojiri, Hasan Padamsee, Maxim Perelstein , et al. (487 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The International Linear Collider (ILC) is on the table now as a new global energy-frontier accelerator laboratory taking data in the 2030s. The ILC addresses key questions for our current understanding of particle physics. It is based on a proven accelerator technology. Its experiments will challenge the Standard Model of particle physics and will provide a new window to look beyond it. This docu… ▽ More The International Linear Collider (ILC) is on the table now as a new global energy-frontier accelerator laboratory taking data in the 2030s. The ILC addresses key questions for our current understanding of particle physics. It is based on a proven accelerator technology. Its experiments will challenge the Standard Model of particle physics and will provide a new window to look beyond it. This document brings the story of the ILC up to date, emphasizing its strong physics motivation, its readiness for construction, and the opportunity it presents to the US and the global particle physics community. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: 356 pages, Large pdf file (40 MB) submitted to Snowmass 2021; v2 references to Snowmass contributions added, additional authors; v3 references added, some updates, additional authors

Report number: DESY-22-045, IFT--UAM/CSIC--22-028, KEK Preprint 2021-61, PNNL-SA-160884, SLAC-PUB-17662

Higgs Factory Considerations

Authors: J. A. Bagger, B. C. Barish, S. Belomestnykh, P. C. Bhat, J. E. Brau, M. Demarteau, D. Denisov, S. C. Eno, C. G. R. Geddes, P. D. Grannis, A. Hutton, A. J. Lankford, M. U. Liepe, D. B. MacFarlane, T. Markiewicz, H. E. Montgomery, J. R. Patterson, M. Perelstein, M. E. Peskin, M. C. Ross, J. Strube, A. P. White, G. W. Wilson

Abstract: We discuss considerations that can be used to formulate recommendations for initiating a lepton collider project that would provide precision studies of the Higgs boson and related electroweak phenomena. We discuss considerations that can be used to formulate recommendations for initiating a lepton collider project that would provide precision studies of the Higgs boson and related electroweak phenomena. △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2022; v1 submitted 11 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Comments: contribution to Snowmass 2021

Electron Ion Collider: Physics and Prospects

Authors: Hugh E. Montgomery

Abstract: We give an outline of the anticipated physics program for a future electron ion collider. The status and prospects for construction of such a device are discussed. We give an outline of the anticipated physics program for a future electron ion collider. The status and prospects for construction of such a device are discussed. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: 9 pages, 5 figures

Report number: JLAB-PHY-16-2310

A Vision of Nuclear and Particle Physics

Authors: Hugh E. Montgomery

Abstract: This paper will consist of a selected, personal view of some of the issues associated with the intersections of nuclear and particle physics. As well as touching on the recent developments we will attempt to look at how those aspects of the subject might evolve over the next few years. This paper will consist of a selected, personal view of some of the issues associated with the intersections of nuclear and particle physics. As well as touching on the recent developments we will attempt to look at how those aspects of the subject might evolve over the next few years. △ Less

Submitted 28 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: CIPANP 2015 Conference Proceedings. 11 pages, 5 figures

Run Scenarios for the Linear Collider

Authors: M. Battaglia, J. Barron, M. Dima, L. Hamilton, A. Johnson, U. Nauenberg, M. Route, D. Staszak, M. Stolte, T. Turner, C. Veeneman, J. Wells, J. Butler, H. E. Montgomery, R. N. Cahn, I. Hinchliffe, G. Bernardi, J. K. Mizukoshi, G. W. Wilson, G. A. Blair, J. Jaros, P. D. Grannis

Abstract: Scenarios are developed for runs at a Linear Collider, in the case that there is a rich program of new physics. Scenarios are developed for runs at a Linear Collider, in the case that there is a rich program of new physics. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2002; originally announced January 2002.

Comments: 12 pages, 10 tables, Latex; Snowmass 2001 plenary report

Journal ref: eConf C010630:E3006,2001