-
LHC EFT WG Note: SMEFT predictions, event reweighting, and simulation
Authors:
Alberto Belvedere,
Saptaparna Bhattacharya,
Giacomo Boldrini,
Suman Chatterjee,
Alessandro Calandri,
Sergio Sánchez Cruz,
Jennet Dickinson,
Franz J. Glessgen,
Reza Goldouzian,
Alexander Grohsjean,
Laurids Jeppe,
Charlotte Knight,
Olivier Mattelaer,
Kelci Mohrman,
Hannah Nelson,
Vasilije Perovic,
Matteo Presilla,
Robert Schöfbeck,
Nick Smith
Abstract:
This note gives an overview of the tools for predicting expectations in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) at the tree level and one loop available through event generators. Methods of event reweighting, the separate simulation of squared matrix elements, and the simulation of the full SMEFT process are compared in terms of statistical efficacy and potential biases.
This note gives an overview of the tools for predicting expectations in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) at the tree level and one loop available through event generators. Methods of event reweighting, the separate simulation of squared matrix elements, and the simulation of the full SMEFT process are compared in terms of statistical efficacy and potential biases.
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2024; v1 submitted 20 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Measurements and EFT fits on detector level
Authors:
Kelci Mohrman
Abstract:
The framework of standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) provides a relatively model-agnostic tool with which to parameterize the off-shell effects of potential heavy new physics. In the top quark sector, the ATLAS and CMS experiments make use of data collected by the CERN LHC to search for these off-shell effects by probing dimension-six SMEFT operators involving top quarks. The analyses em…
▽ More
The framework of standard model effective field theory (SMEFT) provides a relatively model-agnostic tool with which to parameterize the off-shell effects of potential heavy new physics. In the top quark sector, the ATLAS and CMS experiments make use of data collected by the CERN LHC to search for these off-shell effects by probing dimension-six SMEFT operators involving top quarks. The analyses employ a variety of approaches, which range from relatively indirect (e.g. reinterpretations of unfolded measurements) to relatively direct (in which the SMEFT effects are propagated all the way to detector-level predictions). These proceedings discuss the landscape of detector-level SMEFT analyses in ATLAS and CMS, describe the methodology of the direct detector-level approach, and summarize several recent experimental results.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Matching in $pp \to t \bar{t} W/Z/h +$ jet SMEFT studies
Authors:
Reza Goldouzian,
Jeong Han Kim,
Kevin Lannon,
Adam Martin,
Kelci Mohrman,
Andrew Wightman
Abstract:
In this paper, we explore the impact of extra radiation on predictions of $pp \to t\bar{t}X, X = h/W^{\pm}/Z$ processes within the dimension-6 SMEFT framework. While full next-to-leading order calculations are of course preferred, they are not always practical, and so it is useful to be able to capture the impacts of extra radiation using leading-order matrix elements matched to the parton shower.…
▽ More
In this paper, we explore the impact of extra radiation on predictions of $pp \to t\bar{t}X, X = h/W^{\pm}/Z$ processes within the dimension-6 SMEFT framework. While full next-to-leading order calculations are of course preferred, they are not always practical, and so it is useful to be able to capture the impacts of extra radiation using leading-order matrix elements matched to the parton shower. While a matched leading-order calculation for $t\bar{t}X$ is not expected to reproduce the next-to-leading order inclusive cross section precisely, we show that it does capture the relative impact of the EFT effects by considering the ratio of matched SMEFT inclusive cross sections to Standard Model values, $σ_{\rm SMEFT}(t\bar{t}Xj)/σ_{\rm SM}(t\bar{t}Xj) \equiv μ$. Furthermore, we compare leading order calculations with and without extra radiation and find several cases, such as the effect of the operator $(\varphi^{\dagger}i\!\overleftrightarrow{D}_{\!μ}\varphi) (\bar{t}γ^μt)$ on $t\bar{t}h$ and $t\bar{t}W$, for which the relative cross section prediction increases by more than $10\%$ -- significantly larger than the uncertainty derived by varying the input scales in the calculation, including the additional scales required for matching. Being leading order at heart, matching has the benefit that it can be applied to all operators and processes relevant to $pp \to t\bar{t}X, X = h/W^{\pm}/Z +$ jet, is computationally fast and not susceptible to negative weights. Therefore, it is a useful approach in $t\bar{t}X+$ jet studies where complete next-to-leading order results are currently unavailable or unwieldy.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2022; v1 submitted 12 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
