CaloChallenge 2022: A Community Challenge for Fast Calorimeter Simulation
Authors:
Claudius Krause,
Michele Faucci Giannelli,
Gregor Kasieczka,
Benjamin Nachman,
Dalila Salamani,
David Shih,
Anna Zaborowska,
Oz Amram,
Kerstin Borras,
Matthew R. Buckley,
Erik Buhmann,
Thorsten Buss,
Renato Paulo Da Costa Cardoso,
Anthony L. Caterini,
Nadezda Chernyavskaya,
Federico A. G. Corchia,
Jesse C. Cresswell,
Sascha Diefenbacher,
Etienne Dreyer,
Vijay Ekambaram,
Engin Eren,
Florian Ernst,
Luigi Favaro,
Matteo Franchini,
Frank Gaede
, et al. (44 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the results of the "Fast Calorimeter Simulation Challenge 2022" - the CaloChallenge. We study state-of-the-art generative models on four calorimeter shower datasets of increasing dimensionality, ranging from a few hundred voxels to a few tens of thousand voxels. The 31 individual submissions span a wide range of current popular generative architectures, including Variational AutoEncoder…
▽ More
We present the results of the "Fast Calorimeter Simulation Challenge 2022" - the CaloChallenge. We study state-of-the-art generative models on four calorimeter shower datasets of increasing dimensionality, ranging from a few hundred voxels to a few tens of thousand voxels. The 31 individual submissions span a wide range of current popular generative architectures, including Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Normalizing Flows, Diffusion models, and models based on Conditional Flow Matching. We compare all submissions in terms of quality of generated calorimeter showers, as well as shower generation time and model size. To assess the quality we use a broad range of different metrics including differences in 1-dimensional histograms of observables, KPD/FPD scores, AUCs of binary classifiers, and the log-posterior of a multiclass classifier. The results of the CaloChallenge provide the most complete and comprehensive survey of cutting-edge approaches to calorimeter fast simulation to date. In addition, our work provides a uniquely detailed perspective on the important problem of how to evaluate generative models. As such, the results presented here should be applicable for other domains that use generative AI and require fast and faithful generation of samples in a large phase space.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
CaloMan: Fast generation of calorimeter showers with density estimation on learned manifolds
Authors:
Jesse C. Cresswell,
Brendan Leigh Ross,
Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem,
Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez,
Marco Letizia,
Anthony L. Caterini
Abstract:
Precision measurements and new physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider require efficient simulations of particle propagation and interactions within the detectors. The most computationally expensive simulations involve calorimeter showers. Advances in deep generative modelling - particularly in the realm of high-dimensional data - have opened the possibility of generating realistic calorimet…
▽ More
Precision measurements and new physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider require efficient simulations of particle propagation and interactions within the detectors. The most computationally expensive simulations involve calorimeter showers. Advances in deep generative modelling - particularly in the realm of high-dimensional data - have opened the possibility of generating realistic calorimeter showers orders of magnitude more quickly than physics-based simulation. However, the high-dimensional representation of showers belies the relative simplicity and structure of the underlying physical laws. This phenomenon is yet another example of the manifold hypothesis from machine learning, which states that high-dimensional data is supported on low-dimensional manifolds. We thus propose modelling calorimeter showers first by learning their manifold structure, and then estimating the density of data across this manifold. Learning manifold structure reduces the dimensionality of the data, which enables fast training and generation when compared with competing methods.
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
