Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Liebschner, S

Event Generation with Sherpa 2.2

Authors: Enrico Bothmann, Gurpreet Singh Chahal, Stefan Höche, Johannes Krause, Frank Krauss, Silvan Kuttimalai, Sebastian Liebschner, Davide Napoletano, Marek Schönherr, Holger Schulz, Steffen Schumann, Frank Siegert

Abstract: Sherpa is a general-purpose Monte Carlo event generator for the simulation of particle collisions in high-energy collider experiments. We summarize essential features and improvements of the Sherpa 2.2 release series, which is heavily used for event generation in the analysis and interpretation of LHC Run 1 and Run 2 data. We highlight a decade of developments towards ever higher precision in the… ▽ More Sherpa is a general-purpose Monte Carlo event generator for the simulation of particle collisions in high-energy collider experiments. We summarize essential features and improvements of the Sherpa 2.2 release series, which is heavily used for event generation in the analysis and interpretation of LHC Run 1 and Run 2 data. We highlight a decade of developments towards ever higher precision in the simulation of particle-collision events. △ Less

Submitted 3 September, 2019; v1 submitted 22 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 39 pages, 18 figures, extended discussion

Report number: FERMILAB-PUB-19-218-T, SLAC-PUB-17433, IPPP/19/42, MCNET-19-11

Journal ref: SciPost Phys. 7, 034 (2019)

Resonance-aware subtraction in the dipole method

Authors: Stefan Höche, Sebastian Liebschner, Frank Siegert

Abstract: We present a technique for infrared subtraction in next-to-leading order QCD calculations that preserves the virtuality of resonant propagators. The approach is based on the pseudo-dipole subtraction method proposed by Catani and Seymour in the context of identified particle production. As the first applications, we compute the ee > WWbb and pp > WWjbjb cross-section, which are both dominated by t… ▽ More We present a technique for infrared subtraction in next-to-leading order QCD calculations that preserves the virtuality of resonant propagators. The approach is based on the pseudo-dipole subtraction method proposed by Catani and Seymour in the context of identified particle production. As the first applications, we compute the ee > WWbb and pp > WWjbjb cross-section, which are both dominated by top-quark pair production above the threshold. We compare the efficiency of our approach with a calculation performed using the standard dipole subtraction technique. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2019; v1 submitted 11 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Report number: SLAC-PUB-17299, FERMILAB-PUB-18-764-T, MCNET-18-15

Squark production in R-symmetric SUSY with Dirac gluinos: NLO corrections

Authors: Philip Diessner, Wojciech Kotlarski, Sebastian Liebschner, Dominik Stöckinger

Abstract: R-symmetry leads to a distinct realisation of SUSY with a significantly modified coloured sector featuring a Dirac gluino and a scalar colour octet (sgluon). We present the impact of R-symmetry on squark production at the 13 TeV LHC. We study the total cross sections and their NLO corrections from all strongly interacting states, their dependence on the Dirac gluino mass and sgluon mass as well as… ▽ More R-symmetry leads to a distinct realisation of SUSY with a significantly modified coloured sector featuring a Dirac gluino and a scalar colour octet (sgluon). We present the impact of R-symmetry on squark production at the 13 TeV LHC. We study the total cross sections and their NLO corrections from all strongly interacting states, their dependence on the Dirac gluino mass and sgluon mass as well as their systematics for selected benchmark points. We find that tree-level cross sections in the R-symmetric model are reduced compared to the MSSM but the NLO K-factors are generally larger in the order of ten to twenty per cent. In the course of this work we derive the required DREG $\to$ DRED transition counterterms and necessary on-shell renormalisation constants. The real corrections are treated using FKS subtraction, with results cross checked against an independent calculation employing the two cut phase space slicing method. △ Less

Submitted 8 November, 2017; v1 submitted 14 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: 46 pages, 15 figures; updated to match published version

Report number: DESY-17-100

Journal ref: J. High Energ. Phys. (2017) 2017: 142