-
Measurements of the branching fractions of $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Σ^{+}K_{S}^{0}$, $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{0}π^{+}$, and $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{0}K^{+}$ at Belle and Belle II
Authors:
Belle,
Belle II Collaborations,
:,
I. Adachi,
J. K. Ahn,
Y. Ahn,
N. Akopov,
S. Alghamdi,
M. Alhakami,
N. Althubiti,
K. Amos,
N. Anh Ky,
C. Antonioli,
D. M. Asner,
M. Aversano,
R. Ayad,
V. Babu,
N. K. Baghel,
P. Bambade,
Sw. Banerjee,
M. Barrett,
M. Bartl,
J. Baudot,
A. Beaubien,
F. Becherer
, et al. (335 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using 983.0 $\rm{fb}^{-1}$ and 427.9 $\rm{fb}^{-1}$ data samples collected with the Belle and Belle II detectors at the KEKB and SuperKEKB asymmetric energy $e^+e^-$ colliders, respectively, we present studies of the Cabibbo-favored $Ξ_c^+$ decays ${Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Σ^{+}K_{S}^{0}}$ and $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{0}π^{+}$, and the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decay $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{0}K^{+}$. The ratios of branchin…
▽ More
Using 983.0 $\rm{fb}^{-1}$ and 427.9 $\rm{fb}^{-1}$ data samples collected with the Belle and Belle II detectors at the KEKB and SuperKEKB asymmetric energy $e^+e^-$ colliders, respectively, we present studies of the Cabibbo-favored $Ξ_c^+$ decays ${Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Σ^{+}K_{S}^{0}}$ and $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{0}π^{+}$, and the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decay $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{0}K^{+}$. The ratios of branching fractions of ${Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Σ^{+}K_{S}^{0}}$ and $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{0}K^{+}$ relative to that of $Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΞ^{-}π^{+}π^{+}$ are measured for the first time, while the ratio ${\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΞ^{0}π^{+})/{\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΞ^{-}π^{+}π^{+}) $ is also determined and improved by an order of magnitude in precision. The measured branching fraction ratios are $\frac{\cal{B}(Ξ_{c}^{+} \to Σ^{+}K_{S}^{0})}{\cal{B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{-}π^{+}π^+)}= 0.067 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.003$, $\frac{\cal{B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Ξ^{0}π^{+})}{\cal{B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{-}π^{+}π^+)} = 0.248 \pm 0.005 \pm 0.009$, $\frac{\cal{B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Ξ^{0}K^{+})}{\cal{B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Ξ^{-}π^{+}π^+)} = 0.017 \pm 0.003 \pm 0.001$. Additionally, the ratio ${\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΞ^{0}K^{+})/{\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΞ^{0}π^{+})$ is measured to be $ 0.068 \pm 0.010 \pm 0.004$. Here, the first and second uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. Multiplying the ratios by the branching fraction of the normalization mode, ${\mathcal B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΞ^{-}π^{+}π^+)= (2.9\pm 1.3)\%$, we obtain the following absolute branching fractions ${\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΣ^{+}K^{0}_{S}) = (0.194 \pm 0.021 \pm 0.009 \pm 0.087 )%$, ${\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΞ^{0}π^{+}) = (0.719 \pm 0.014 \pm 0.024 \pm 0.322 )%$, ${\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{+}\toΞ^{0}K^{+}) = (0.049 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.002 \pm 0.022 )%$.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Observations of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays $Ξ_c^{+} \to pK_{S}^{0}$, $Ξ_c^+ \to Λπ^+$, and $Ξ_c^+ \to Σ^{0} π^+$ at Belle and Belle II
Authors:
Belle,
Belle II Collaborations,
:,
I. Adachi,
L. Aggarwal,
N. Akopov,
M. Alhakami,
A. Aloisio,
N. Althubiti,
N. Anh Ky,
D. M. Asner,
H. Atmacan,
T. Aushev,
V. Aushev,
M. Aversano,
R. Ayad,
V. Babu,
N. K. Baghel,
S. Bahinipati,
P. Bambade,
Sw. Banerjee,
M. Barrett,
J. Baudot,
A. Baur,
A. Beaubien
, et al. (323 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using data samples of 983.0~$\rm fb^{-1}$ and 427.9~$\rm fb^{-1}$ accumulated with the Belle and Belle~II detectors operating at the KEKB and SuperKEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ colliders, singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays $Ξ_c^{+} \to pK_{S}^{0}$, $Ξ_c^+ \to Λπ^+$, and $Ξ_c^+ \to Σ^{0} π^+$ are observed for the first time. The ratios of branching fractions of $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to p K_{S}^{0}$,…
▽ More
Using data samples of 983.0~$\rm fb^{-1}$ and 427.9~$\rm fb^{-1}$ accumulated with the Belle and Belle~II detectors operating at the KEKB and SuperKEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ colliders, singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays $Ξ_c^{+} \to pK_{S}^{0}$, $Ξ_c^+ \to Λπ^+$, and $Ξ_c^+ \to Σ^{0} π^+$ are observed for the first time. The ratios of branching fractions of $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to p K_{S}^{0}$, $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Λπ^{+}$, and $Ξ_{c}^{+}\to Σ^{0} π^{+}$ relative to that of $Ξ_c^+ \to Ξ^- π^{+} π^{+}$ are measured to be \begin{equation} \frac{{\cal B}(Ξ_c^+ \to pK_S^0)}{{\cal B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Ξ^{-} π^+ π^+)} = (2.47 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.07)\% \notag, \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{{\cal B}(Ξ_c^+ \to Λπ^+)}{{\cal B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Ξ^{-} π^+ π^+)} = (1.56 \pm 0.14 \pm 0.09)\% \notag, \end{equation} \begin{equation} \frac{{\cal B}(Ξ_c^+ \to Σ^0 π^+)}{{\cal B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Ξ^{-} π^+ π^+)} = (4.13 \pm 0.26 \pm 0.22)\% \notag. \end{equation} Multiplying these values by the branching fraction of the normalization channel, ${\cal B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Ξ^{-} π^+π^+) = (2.9 \pm 1.3)\%$, the absolute branching fractions are determined to be \begin{equation} {\cal B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to p K_{S}^{0}) = (7.16 \pm 0.46 \pm 0.20 \pm 3.21) \times 10^{-4} \notag, \end{equation} \begin{equation} {\cal B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Λπ^+) = (4.52 \pm 0.41 \pm 0.26 \pm 2.03) \times 10^{-4} \notag, \end{equation} \begin{equation} {\cal B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Σ^0 π^+) = (1.20 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.54) \times 10^{-3} \notag. \end{equation} The first and second uncertainties above are statistical and systematic, respectively, while the third ones arise from the uncertainty in ${\cal B}(Ξ_c^{+} \to Ξ^{-} π^{+} π^{+})$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Measurements of the branching fractions of $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}π^{0}$, $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}η$, and $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}η^{\prime}$ and asymmetry parameter of $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}π^{0}$
Authors:
Belle,
Belle II Collaborations,
:,
I. Adachi,
L. Aggarwal,
H. Aihara,
N. Akopov,
A. Aloisio,
N. Althubiti,
N. Anh Ky,
D. M. Asner,
H. Atmacan,
T. Aushev,
V. Aushev,
M. Aversano,
R. Ayad,
V. Babu,
H. Bae,
S. Bahinipati,
P. Bambade,
Sw. Banerjee,
M. Barrett,
J. Baudot,
A. Baur,
A. Beaubien
, et al. (360 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a study of $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}π^{0}$, $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}η$, and $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}η^{\prime}$ decays using the Belle and Belle~II data samples, which have integrated luminosities of 980~$\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ and 426~$\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$, respectively. We measure the following relative branching fractions…
▽ More
We present a study of $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}π^{0}$, $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}η$, and $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}η^{\prime}$ decays using the Belle and Belle~II data samples, which have integrated luminosities of 980~$\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ and 426~$\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$, respectively. We measure the following relative branching fractions $${\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}π^{0})/{\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{-}π^{+}) = 0.48 \pm 0.02 ({\rm stat}) \pm 0.03 ({\rm syst}) ,$$ $${\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}η)/{\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{-}π^{+}) = 0.11 \pm 0.01 ({\rm stat}) \pm 0.01 ({\rm syst}) ,$$ $${\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}η^{\prime})/{\cal B}(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{-}π^{+}) = 0.08 \pm 0.02 ({\rm stat}) \pm 0.01 ({\rm syst}) $$ for the first time, where the uncertainties are statistical ($\rm stat$) and systematic ($\rm syst$). By multiplying by the branching fraction of the normalization mode, ${\mathcal B}(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{-}π^{+})$, we obtain the following absolute branching fraction results $(6.9 \pm 0.3 ({\rm stat}) \pm 0.5 ({\rm syst}) \pm 1.3 ({\rm norm})) \times 10^{-3}$, $(1.6 \pm 0.2 ({\rm stat}) \pm 0.2 ({\rm syst}) \pm 0.3 ({\rm norm})) \times 10^{-3}$, and $(1.2 \pm 0.3 ({\rm stat}) \pm 0.1 ({\rm syst}) \pm 0.2 ({\rm norm})) \times 10^{-3}$, for $Ξ_{c}^{0}$ decays to $Ξ^{0}π^{0}$, $Ξ^{0}η$, and $Ξ^{0}η^{\prime}$ final states, respectively. The third errors are from the uncertainty on ${\mathcal B}(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{-}π^{+})$. The asymmetry parameter for $Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}π^{0}$ is measured to be $α(Ξ_{c}^{0}\toΞ^{0}π^{0}) = -0.90\pm0.15({\rm stat})\pm0.23({\rm syst})$.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2024; v1 submitted 7 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Electric and magnetic energy at axion haloscopes
Authors:
B. R. Ko,
H. Themann,
W. Jang,
J. Choi,
D. Kim,
M. J. Lee,
J. Lee,
E. Won,
Y. K. Semertzidis
Abstract:
We review a recent letter published in Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{116}$, 161804 (2016) of which the main argument is that the mode dependent magnetic form factors at axion haloscopes depend on the position of the cavity inside the solenoid while the corresponding electric form factors do not. We, however, find no such dependence, which is also equivalent to the statement that the electric and corre…
▽ More
We review a recent letter published in Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{116}$, 161804 (2016) of which the main argument is that the mode dependent magnetic form factors at axion haloscopes depend on the position of the cavity inside the solenoid while the corresponding electric form factors do not. We, however, find no such dependence, which is also equivalent to the statement that the electric and corresponding magnetic energy stored in the cavity modes are the same regardless of the position of the cavity inside the solenoid. Furthermore, we extend the statement to the cases satisfying $\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{B}_{\rm external}=0$, where $\vec{B}_{\rm external}$ is a static magnetic field provided by a magnet at an axion haloscope. Two typical magnets, solenoidal and toroidal, satisfy $\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{B}_{\rm external}=0$, thus the electric and corresponding magnetic energy stored in the cavity modes are always the same in both cases. The energy, however, is independent of the position of the cavity in axion haloscopes with a solenoid, but depends on those with a toroidal magnet.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
-
The Physics of the B Factories
Authors:
A. J. Bevan,
B. Golob,
Th. Mannel,
S. Prell,
B. D. Yabsley,
K. Abe,
H. Aihara,
F. Anulli,
N. Arnaud,
T. Aushev,
M. Beneke,
J. Beringer,
F. Bianchi,
I. I. Bigi,
M. Bona,
N. Brambilla,
J. B rodzicka,
P. Chang,
M. J. Charles,
C. H. Cheng,
H. -Y. Cheng,
R. Chistov,
P. Colangelo,
J. P. Coleman,
A. Drutskoy
, et al. (2009 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work is on the Physics of the B Factories. Part A of this book contains a brief description of the SLAC and KEK B Factories as well as their detectors, BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues. Part B discusses tools and methods used by the experiments in order to obtain results. The results themselves can be found in Part C.
Please note that version 3 on the archive is the auxiliary…
▽ More
This work is on the Physics of the B Factories. Part A of this book contains a brief description of the SLAC and KEK B Factories as well as their detectors, BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues. Part B discusses tools and methods used by the experiments in order to obtain results. The results themselves can be found in Part C.
Please note that version 3 on the archive is the auxiliary version of the Physics of the B Factories book. This uses the notation alpha, beta, gamma for the angles of the Unitarity Triangle. The nominal version uses the notation phi_1, phi_2 and phi_3. Please cite this work as Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 3026.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2015; v1 submitted 24 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
