-
United States Muon Collider Community White Paper for the European Strategy for Particle Physics Update
Authors:
A. Abdelhamid,
D. Acosta,
P. Affleck,
G. Agarwal,
K. Agashe,
P. Agrawal,
R. Alharthy,
B. Allmond,
D. Ally,
G. Ambrosio,
O. Amram,
A. Apresyan,
A. Apyan,
C. Aruta,
C. Arzate,
P. Asadi,
J. Ashley,
A. Avasthi,
J. Backus,
R. Bartek,
A. Batz,
L. Bauerdick,
C. Bell,
S. Belomestnykh,
J. S. Berg
, et al. (280 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This document is being submitted to the 2024-2026 European Strategy for Particle Physics Update (ESPPU) process on behalf of the US Muon Collider community, with its preparation coordinated by the interim US Muon Collider Coordination Group. The US Muon Collider Community comprises a few hundred American scientists. The purpose of the document is to inform ESPPU about the US plans for Muon Collide…
▽ More
This document is being submitted to the 2024-2026 European Strategy for Particle Physics Update (ESPPU) process on behalf of the US Muon Collider community, with its preparation coordinated by the interim US Muon Collider Coordination Group. The US Muon Collider Community comprises a few hundred American scientists. The purpose of the document is to inform ESPPU about the US plans for Muon Collider research and development (R&D), explain how these efforts align with the broader international R&D initiatives, and present the US community vision for the future realization of this transformative project.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2025; v1 submitted 30 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Snowmass 2001: Jet Energy Flow Project
Authors:
C. F. Berger,
E. L. Berger,
P. C. Bhat,
J. M. Butterworth,
S. D. Ellis,
B. Flaugher,
W. T. Giele,
W. Kilgore,
A. Kulesza,
S. Lammers,
S. Magill,
H. Prosper
Abstract:
Conventional cone jet algorithms arose from heuristic considerations of LO hard scattering coupled to independent showering. These algorithms implicitly assume that the final states of individual events can be mapped onto a unique set of jets that are in turn associated with a unique set of underlying hard scattering partons. Thus each final state hadron is assigned to a unique underlying parton…
▽ More
Conventional cone jet algorithms arose from heuristic considerations of LO hard scattering coupled to independent showering. These algorithms implicitly assume that the final states of individual events can be mapped onto a unique set of jets that are in turn associated with a unique set of underlying hard scattering partons. Thus each final state hadron is assigned to a unique underlying parton. The Jet Energy Flow (JEF) analysis described here does not make such assumptions. The final states of individual events are instead described in terms of flow distributions of hadronic energy. Quantities of physical interest are constructed from the energy flow distribution summed over all events. The resulting analysis is less sensitive to higher order perturbative corrections and the impact of showering and hadronization than the standard cone algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2002;
originally announced February 2002.
-
Results of the Survey on the Future of HEP
Authors:
B. T. Fleming,
J. Krane,
G. P. Zeller,
F. Canelli,
B. Connolly,
R. Erbacher,
G. T. Fleming,
D. A. Harris,
E. Hawker,
M. Hildreth,
B. Kilminster,
S. Lammers,
D. Medoff,
J. Monroe,
D. Toback,
M. Sorel,
A. Turcot,
M. Velasco,
M. O. Wascko,
G. Watts,
E. D. Zimmerman
Abstract:
The Young Physicists Panel (YPP) summarizes results from their Survey on the Future of High Energy Physics, which was conducted from July 2 to July 15, 2001. Over 1500 physicists from around the world, both young and tenured, responded to the survey. We first describe the origin, design, and advertisement of the survey, and then present the demographics of the respondents. Following sections ana…
▽ More
The Young Physicists Panel (YPP) summarizes results from their Survey on the Future of High Energy Physics, which was conducted from July 2 to July 15, 2001. Over 1500 physicists from around the world, both young and tenured, responded to the survey. We first describe the origin, design, and advertisement of the survey, and then present the demographics of the respondents. Following sections analyze the collected opinions on the desire for balance in the field, the impact of globalization, the necessity of outreach, how to build the field, the physics that drives the field, and the selection of the next big machine. Respondents' comments follow the survey analysis in an appendix.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2001; v1 submitted 23 August, 2001;
originally announced August 2001.