Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Krug, S

Two-pion exchange for coupled-channel scattering of two heavy mesons

Authors: J. T. Chacko, V. Baru, C. Hanhart, S. L. Krug

Abstract: To improve the theoretical understanding of multiquark states like $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$, we calculate the heavy-meson heavy-(anti)meson scattering potential up to next-to-leading order, $O(Q^2)$, within chiral effective field theory ($χ$EFT) employing a power counting scheme that explicitly keeps track with the large momentum scale $Q \sim \sqrt{2μδ}$ (where $δ= m_V - m_P$ is the vector-p… ▽ More To improve the theoretical understanding of multiquark states like $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$, we calculate the heavy-meson heavy-(anti)meson scattering potential up to next-to-leading order, $O(Q^2)$, within chiral effective field theory ($χ$EFT) employing a power counting scheme that explicitly keeps track with the large momentum scale $Q \sim \sqrt{2μδ}$ (where $δ= m_V - m_P$ is the vector-pseudoscalar mass difference and $μ$ their reduced mass) introduced by the coupled channel dynamics. We provide expressions for the two-pion exchange (TPE) terms up to $O(Q^2)$ and their partial-wave decomposition. We show that these potentials are well-approximated by contact terms at $O(Q^2)$, with minor residual non-analytic TPE contributions, supporting $χ$EFT convergence in the theoretical predictions for $Z_b(10610)$ and $Z_b(10650)$, as well as their spin partners. These findings are also relevant for $D^{(*)}D^{(*)}$ scattering, especially for the $T_{cc}$ state, for both physical and lattice QCD data with moderately larger pion masses. We further demonstrate that the differences between isovector and isoscalar potentials for heavy mesons are naturally explained by the TPE contributions. △ Less

Submitted 20 March, 2025; v1 submitted 20 November, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

Comments: 41 pages, 18 figures

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.D 111 (2025) 3, 034042

The regularization and determination of the Yang-Mills vacuum wave functional in three dimensions at O(e^2)

Authors: Sebastian Krug, Antonio Pineda

Abstract: We complete the computation of the Yang-Mills vacuum wave functional in three dimensions at weak coupling with O(e^2) precision. We use two different methods to solve the functional Schroedinger equation. One of them generalizes to O(e^2) the method followed by Hatfield at O(e). The other uses the weak coupling version of the gauge invariant formulation of the Schroedinger equation and the ground… ▽ More We complete the computation of the Yang-Mills vacuum wave functional in three dimensions at weak coupling with O(e^2) precision. We use two different methods to solve the functional Schroedinger equation. One of them generalizes to O(e^2) the method followed by Hatfield at O(e). The other uses the weak coupling version of the gauge invariant formulation of the Schroedinger equation and the ground state wave functional followed by Karabali, Nair, and Yelnikov. These methods need to be carefully regularized to yield correct results. This is done in this paper with full detail. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2013; v1 submitted 12 August, 2013; originally announced August 2013.

Comments: 37 pages, 1 figure, extended conclusions and added demonstration of hermiticity of regularized Hamiltonian, one new reference. Physics unchanged. To meet journal version

Journal ref: Nucl.Phys.B 878, 82 (2014)

The Yang-Mills vacuum wave functional in three dimensions at weak coupling

Authors: Sebastian Krug, Antonio Pineda

Abstract: We compute the Yang-Mills vacuum wave functional in three dimensions at weak coupling with O(e^2) precision. We use two different methods to solve the Schroedinger functional equation. One of them generalizes to O(e^2) the method followed by Hatfield at O(e). The other uses the weak coupling version of the gauge invariant formulation of the Schroedinger equation and the ground state wave functiona… ▽ More We compute the Yang-Mills vacuum wave functional in three dimensions at weak coupling with O(e^2) precision. We use two different methods to solve the Schroedinger functional equation. One of them generalizes to O(e^2) the method followed by Hatfield at O(e). The other uses the weak coupling version of the gauge invariant formulation of the Schroedinger equation and the ground state wave functional followed by Karabali, Nair, and Yelnikov. We compare both results and discuss the differences between them. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2013; v1 submitted 29 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Comments: 29 pages, two new references, minor changes, physics unchanged. To meet journal version

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.D 88, 125001 (2013)