-
The origin and evolution of the normal Type Ia SN 2018aoz with infant-phase reddening and excess emission
Authors:
Yuan Qi Ni,
Dae-Sik Moon,
Maria R. Drout,
Abigail Polin,
David J. Sand,
Santiago GonzÁlez-GaitÁn,
Sang Chul Kim,
Youngdae Lee,
Hong Soo Park,
D. Andrew Howell,
Peter E. Nugent,
Anthony L. Piro,
Peter J. Brown,
LluÍs Galbany,
Jamison Burke,
Daichi Hiramatsu,
Griffin Hosseinzadeh,
Stefano Valenti,
Niloufar Afsariardchi,
Jennifer E. Andrews,
John Antoniadis,
Rachael L. Beaton,
K. Azalee Bostroem,
Raymond G. Carlberg,
S. Bradley Cenko
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
SN~2018aoz is a Type Ia SN with a $B$-band plateau and excess emission in the infant-phase light curves $\lesssim$ 1 day after first light, evidencing an over-density of surface iron-peak elements as shown in our previous study. Here, we advance the constraints on the nature and origin of SN~2018aoz based on its evolution until the nebular phase. Near-peak spectroscopic features show the SN is int…
▽ More
SN~2018aoz is a Type Ia SN with a $B$-band plateau and excess emission in the infant-phase light curves $\lesssim$ 1 day after first light, evidencing an over-density of surface iron-peak elements as shown in our previous study. Here, we advance the constraints on the nature and origin of SN~2018aoz based on its evolution until the nebular phase. Near-peak spectroscopic features show the SN is intermediate between two subtypes of normal Type Ia: Core-Normal and Broad-Line. The excess emission could have contributions from the radioactive decay of surface iron-peak elements as well as ejecta interaction with either the binary companion or a small torus of circumstellar material. Nebular-phase limits on H$α$ and He~I favour a white dwarf companion, consistent with the small companion size constrained by the low early SN luminosity, while the absence of [O~I] and He~I disfavours a violent merger of the progenitor. Of the two main explosion mechanisms proposed to explain the distribution of surface iron-peak elements in SN~2018aoz, the asymmetric Chandrasekhar-mass explosion is less consistent with the progenitor constraints and the observed blueshifts of nebular-phase [Fe~II] and [Ni~II]. The helium-shell double-detonation explosion is compatible with the observed lack of C spectral features, but current 1-D models are incompatible with the infant-phase excess emission, $B_{\rm max}-V_{\rm max}$ color, and absence of nebular-phase [Ca~II]. Although the explosion processes of SN~2018aoz still need to be more precisely understood, the same processes could produce a significant fraction of Type Ia SNe that appear normal after $\sim$ 1 day.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2025; v1 submitted 24 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Physics Potentials with the Second Hyper-Kamiokande Detector in Korea
Authors:
Hyper-Kamiokande proto-collaboration,
:,
K. Abe,
Ke. Abe,
S. H. Ahn,
H. Aihara,
A. Aimi,
R. Akutsu,
C. Andreopoulos,
I. Anghel,
L. H. V. Anthony,
M. Antonova,
Y. Ashida,
V. Aushev,
M. Barbi,
G. J. Barker,
G. Barr,
P. Beltrame,
V. Berardi,
M. Bergevin,
S. Berkman,
L. Berns,
T. Berry,
S. Bhadra,
D. Bravo-Bergu no
, et al. (331 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Hyper-Kamiokande consists of two identical water-Cherenkov detectors of total 520~kt with the first one in Japan at 295~km from the J-PARC neutrino beam with 2.5$^{\textrm{o}}$ Off-Axis Angles (OAAs), and the second one possibly in Korea in a later stage. Having the second detector in Korea would benefit almost all areas of neutrino oscillation physics mainly due to longer baselines. There are sev…
▽ More
Hyper-Kamiokande consists of two identical water-Cherenkov detectors of total 520~kt with the first one in Japan at 295~km from the J-PARC neutrino beam with 2.5$^{\textrm{o}}$ Off-Axis Angles (OAAs), and the second one possibly in Korea in a later stage. Having the second detector in Korea would benefit almost all areas of neutrino oscillation physics mainly due to longer baselines. There are several candidate sites in Korea with baselines of 1,000$\sim$1,300~km and OAAs of 1$^{\textrm{o}}$$\sim$3$^{\textrm{o}}$. We conducted sensitivity studies on neutrino oscillation physics for a second detector, either in Japan (JD $\times$ 2) or Korea (JD + KD) and compared the results with a single detector in Japan. Leptonic CP violation sensitivity is improved especially when the CP is non-maximally violated. The larger matter effect at Korean candidate sites significantly enhances sensitivities to non-standard interactions of neutrinos and mass ordering determination. Current studies indicate the best sensitivity is obtained at Mt. Bisul (1,088~km baseline, $1.3^\circ$ OAA). Thanks to a larger (1,000~m) overburden than the first detector site, clear improvements to sensitivities for solar and supernova relic neutrino searches are expected.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2018; v1 submitted 18 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Search for solar axions with CsI(Tl) crystal detectors
Authors:
KIMS Collaboration,
Y. S. Yoon,
H. K. Park,
H. Bhang,
J. H. Choi,
S. Choi,
I. S. Hahn,
E. J. Jeon,
H. W. Joo,
W. G. Kang,
B. H. Kim,
G. B. Kim,
H. J. Kim,
K. W. Kim,
S. C. Kim,
S. K. Kim,
Y. D. Kim,
Y. H. Kim,
H. S. Lee,
J. H. Lee,
J. K. Lee,
S. J. Lee,
D. S. Leonard,
J. Li,
S. S. Myung
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The results of a search for solar axions from the Korea Invisible Mass Search (KIMS) experiment at the Yangyang Underground Laboratory are presented. Low-energy electron-recoil events would be produced by conversion of solar axions into electrons via the axio-electric effect in CsI(Tl) crystals. Using data from an exposure of 34,596 $\rm kg \cdot days$, we set a 90 \% confidence level upper limit…
▽ More
The results of a search for solar axions from the Korea Invisible Mass Search (KIMS) experiment at the Yangyang Underground Laboratory are presented. Low-energy electron-recoil events would be produced by conversion of solar axions into electrons via the axio-electric effect in CsI(Tl) crystals. Using data from an exposure of 34,596 $\rm kg \cdot days$, we set a 90 \% confidence level upper limit on the axion-electron coupling, $g_{ae}$, of $1.39 \times 10^{-11}$ for an axion mass less than 1 keV/$\rm c^2$. This limit is lower than the indirect solar neutrino bound, and fully excludes QCD axions heavier than 0.48 eV/$\rm c^2$ and 140.9 eV/$\rm c^2$ for the DFSZ and KSVZ models respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2016; v1 submitted 6 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.