-
The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Running of the Spectral Index
Authors:
Gabriella Agazie,
Akash Anumarlapudi,
Anne M. Archibald,
Zaven Arzoumanian,
Jeremy George Baier,
Paul T. Baker,
Bence Bécsy,
Laura Blecha,
Adam Brazier,
Paul R. Brook,
Sarah Burke-Spolaor,
J. Andrew Casey-Clyde,
Maria Charisi,
Shami Chatterjee,
Tyler Cohen,
James M. Cordes,
Neil J. Cornish,
Fronefield Crawford,
H. Thankful Cromartie,
Kathryn Crowter,
Megan E. DeCesar,
Paul B. Demorest,
Heling Deng,
Lankeswar Dey,
Timothy Dolch
, et al. (80 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The NANOGrav 15-year data provides compelling evidence for a stochastic gravitational-wave (GW) background at nanohertz frequencies. The simplest model-independent approach to characterizing the frequency spectrum of this signal consists in a simple power-law fit involving two parameters: an amplitude A and a spectral index γ. In this paper, we consider the next logical step beyond this minimal sp…
▽ More
The NANOGrav 15-year data provides compelling evidence for a stochastic gravitational-wave (GW) background at nanohertz frequencies. The simplest model-independent approach to characterizing the frequency spectrum of this signal consists in a simple power-law fit involving two parameters: an amplitude A and a spectral index γ. In this paper, we consider the next logical step beyond this minimal spectral model, allowing for a running (i.e., logarithmic frequency dependence) of the spectral index, γ_run(f) = γ+ β\ln(f/f_ref). We fit this running-power-law (RPL) model to the NANOGrav 15-year data and perform a Bayesian model comparison with the minimal constant-power-law (CPL) model, which results in a 95% credible interval for the parameter βconsistent with no running, β\in [-0.80,2.96], and an inconclusive Bayes factor, B(RPL vs. CPL) = 0.69 +- 0.01. We thus conclude that, at present, the minimal CPL model still suffices to adequately describe the NANOGrav signal; however, future data sets may well lead to a measurement of nonzero β. Finally, we interpret the RPL model as a description of primordial GWs generated during cosmic inflation, which allows us to combine our results with upper limits from big-bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background, and LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2025; v1 submitted 19 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics
Authors:
Adeela Afzal,
Gabriella Agazie,
Akash Anumarlapudi,
Anne M. Archibald,
Zaven Arzoumanian,
Paul T. Baker,
Bence Bécsy,
Jose Juan Blanco-Pillado,
Laura Blecha,
Kimberly K. Boddy,
Adam Brazier,
Paul R. Brook,
Sarah Burke-Spolaor,
Rand Burnette,
Robin Case,
Maria Charisi,
Shami Chatterjee,
Katerina Chatziioannou,
Belinda D. Cheeseboro,
Siyuan Chen,
Tyler Cohen,
James M. Cordes,
Neil J. Cornish,
Fronefield Crawford,
H. Thankful Cromartie
, et al. (98 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The 15-year pulsar timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) shows positive evidence for the presence of a low-frequency gravitational-wave (GW) background. In this paper, we investigate potential cosmological interpretations of this signal, specifically cosmic inflation, scalar-induced GWs, first-order phase transitions, cosmic string…
▽ More
The 15-year pulsar timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) shows positive evidence for the presence of a low-frequency gravitational-wave (GW) background. In this paper, we investigate potential cosmological interpretations of this signal, specifically cosmic inflation, scalar-induced GWs, first-order phase transitions, cosmic strings, and domain walls. We find that, with the exception of stable cosmic strings of field theory origin, all these models can reproduce the observed signal. When compared to the standard interpretation in terms of inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs), many cosmological models seem to provide a better fit resulting in Bayes factors in the range from 10 to 100. However, these results strongly depend on modeling assumptions about the cosmic SMBHB population and, at this stage, should not be regarded as evidence for new physics. Furthermore, we identify excluded parameter regions where the predicted GW signal from cosmological sources significantly exceeds the NANOGrav signal. These parameter constraints are independent of the origin of the NANOGrav signal and illustrate how pulsar timing data provide a new way to constrain the parameter space of these models. Finally, we search for deterministic signals produced by models of ultralight dark matter (ULDM) and dark matter substructures in the Milky Way. We find no evidence for either of these signals and thus report updated constraints on these models. In the case of ULDM, these constraints outperform torsion balance and atomic clock constraints for ULDM coupled to electrons, muons, or gluons.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Searching For Gravitational Waves From Cosmological Phase Transitions With The NANOGrav 12.5-year dataset
Authors:
Zaven Arzoumanian,
Paul T. Baker,
Harsha Blumer,
Bence Bécsy,
Adam Brazier,
Paul R. Brook,
Sarah Burke-Spolaor,
Maria Charisi,
Shami Chatterjee,
Siyuan Chen,
James M. Cordes,
Neil J. Cornish,
Fronefield Crawford,
H. Thankful Cromartie,
Megan E. DeCesar,
Paul B. Demorest,
Timothy Dolch,
Justin A. Ellis,
Elizabeth C. Ferrara,
William Fiore,
Emmanuel Fonseca,
Nathan Garver-Daniels,
Peter A. Gentile,
Deborah C. Good,
Jeffrey S. Hazboun
, et al. (40 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We search for a first-order phase transition gravitational wave signal in 45 pulsars from the NANOGrav 12.5 year dataset. We find that the data can be modeled in terms of a strong first order phase transition taking place at temperatures below the electroweak scale. However, we do not observe any strong preference for a phase-transition interpretation of the signal over the standard astrophysical…
▽ More
We search for a first-order phase transition gravitational wave signal in 45 pulsars from the NANOGrav 12.5 year dataset. We find that the data can be modeled in terms of a strong first order phase transition taking place at temperatures below the electroweak scale. However, we do not observe any strong preference for a phase-transition interpretation of the signal over the standard astrophysical interpretation in terms of supermassive black holes mergers; but we expect to gain additional discriminating power with future datasets, improving the signal to noise ratio and extending the sensitivity window to lower frequencies. An interesting open question is how well gravitational wave observatories could separate such signals.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2022; v1 submitted 28 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
