Reconstructing Primordial Curvature Perturbations via Scalar-Induced Gravitational Waves with LISA
Authors:
Jonas El Gammal,
Aya Ghaleb,
Gabriele Franciolini,
Theodoros Papanikolaou,
Marco Peloso,
Gabriele Perna,
Mauro Pieroni,
Angelo Ricciardone,
Robert Rosati,
Gianmassimo Tasinato,
Matteo Braglia,
Jacopo Fumagalli,
Jun'ya Kume,
Enrico Morgante,
Germano Nardini,
Davide Racco,
Sébastien Renaux-Petel,
Hardi Veermäe,
Denis Werth,
Ivonne Zavala
Abstract:
Many early universe scenarios predict an enhancement of scalar perturbations at scales currently unconstrained by cosmological probes. These perturbations source gravitational waves (GWs) at second order in perturbation theory, leading to a scalar-induced gravitational wave (SIGW) background. The LISA detector, sensitive to mHz GWs, will be able to constrain curvature perturbations in a new window…
▽ More
Many early universe scenarios predict an enhancement of scalar perturbations at scales currently unconstrained by cosmological probes. These perturbations source gravitational waves (GWs) at second order in perturbation theory, leading to a scalar-induced gravitational wave (SIGW) background. The LISA detector, sensitive to mHz GWs, will be able to constrain curvature perturbations in a new window corresponding to scales $k \in [10^{10}, 10^{14}] \,{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, difficult to probe otherwise. In this work, we forecast the capabilities of LISA to constrain the source of SIGWs using different approaches: i) agnostic, where the spectrum of curvature perturbations is binned in frequency space; ii) template-based, modeling the curvature power spectrum based on motivated classes of models; iii) ab initio, starting from first-principles model of inflation featuring an ultra-slow roll phase. We compare the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. We also discuss the impact on the SIGW spectrum of non-standard thermal histories affecting the kernels of SIGW emission and non-Gaussianity in the statistics of the curvature perturbations. Finally, we propose simple tests to assess whether the signal is compatible with the SIGW hypothesis. The pipeline used is built into the SIGWAY code.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2025; v1 submitted 20 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
Circular reasoning: Solving the Hubble tension with a non-$π$ value of $π$
Authors:
Jonas El Gammal,
Sven Günther,
Emil Brinch Holm,
Andreas Nygaard
Abstract:
Recently, cosmology has seen a surge in alternative models that purport to solve the discrepancy between the values of the Hubble constant $H_0$ as measured by cosmological microwave background anisotropies and local supernovae, respectively. In particular, many of the most successful approaches have involved varying fundamental constants, such as an alternative value of the fine structure constan…
▽ More
Recently, cosmology has seen a surge in alternative models that purport to solve the discrepancy between the values of the Hubble constant $H_0$ as measured by cosmological microwave background anisotropies and local supernovae, respectively. In particular, many of the most successful approaches have involved varying fundamental constants, such as an alternative value of the fine structure constant and time-varying values of the electron mass, the latter of which showed particular promise as the strongest candidate in several earlier studies. Inspired by these approaches, in this paper, we investigate a cosmological model where the value of the geometric constant $π$ is taken to be a free model parameter. Using the latest CMB data from Planck as well as baryon-acoustic oscillation data, we constrain the parameters of the model and find a strong correlation between $π$ and $H_0$, with the final constraint $H_0 = 71.3 \pm 1.1 \ \mathrm{ km/s/Mpc}$, equivalent to a mere $1.5σ$ discrepancy with the value measured by the SH0ES collaboration. Furthermore, our results show that $π= 3.206 \pm 0.038$ at $95 \%$ C.L., which is in good agreement with several external measurements discussed in the paper. Hence, we conclude that the $πΛ$CDM model presented in this paper, which has only a single extra parameter, currently stands as the perhaps strongest solution to the Hubble tension.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
