Timing irregularities and glitches from the pulsar monitoring campaign at IAR
Authors:
E. Zubieta,
F. Garcia,
S. del Palacio,
S. B. Araujo Furlan,
G. Gancio,
C. O. Lousto,
J. A. Combi,
C. M. Espinoza
Abstract:
Context. Pulsars have a very stable rotation. However, sudden increases in their rotation frequency known as glitches, perturb their evolution. While large glitches are commonly detected, small glitches are harder to detect because of the lack of daily-cadence observations over long periods of time.
Aims. We aim to explore the timing behaviour of young pulsars at daily timescales looking for sma…
▽ More
Context. Pulsars have a very stable rotation. However, sudden increases in their rotation frequency known as glitches, perturb their evolution. While large glitches are commonly detected, small glitches are harder to detect because of the lack of daily-cadence observations over long periods of time.
Aims. We aim to explore the timing behaviour of young pulsars at daily timescales looking for small glitches and other irregularities. This will further our comprehension of the distribution of glitch sizes, which has also consequences for the theoretical modeling of the glitch mechanism.
Methods. We observed six pulsars with up to daily cadence during 5 years with the antennas of the Argentine Institute of Radio Astronomy (IAR). We used standard pulsar timing tools to characterise the rotation of pulsars and developed an algorithm to look for small timing events in the data and calculate the changes in $ν$ and $\dotν$ at those epochs.
Results. We found that the rotation of pulsars in this dataset is affected by small step changes in $ν$ and $\dotν$. We found three glitches that had not been reported before: two in PSR J1048-5832 with relative sizes $Δν/ ν= 9.1(4) \times 10^{-10}$ and $Δν/ ν= 4.5(1) \times 10^{-10}$, and one in the Vela pulsar with a size $Δν/ ν= 2.0(2) \times 10^{-10}$. We also report new decay terms on the 2021 Vela giant glitch, and on the 2022 giant glitches in PSR J0742-2822 and PSR J1740-3015 respectively. Besides, we found that the red noise contribution significantly diminished in PSR J0742-2822 after its giant glitch in 2022.
Conclusions. Our results highlight the importance of high-cadence monitoring with an exhaustive analysis of the residuals to better characterize the distribution of glitch sizes and to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms behind glitches, red noise and timing irregularities.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
The hottest superfluid and superconductor in the Universe: Discovery and nuclear physics implications
Authors:
Wynn C. G. Ho,
Nils Andersson,
Cristobal M. Espinoza,
Kostas Glampedakis,
Brynmor Haskell,
Craig O. Heinke
Abstract:
We present recent work on using astronomical observations of neutron stars to reveal unique insights into nuclear matter that cannot be obtained from laboratories on Earth. First, we discuss our measurement of the rapid cooling of the youngest neutron star in the Galaxy; this provides the first direct evidence for superfluidity and superconductivity in the supra-nuclear core of neutron stars. We s…
▽ More
We present recent work on using astronomical observations of neutron stars to reveal unique insights into nuclear matter that cannot be obtained from laboratories on Earth. First, we discuss our measurement of the rapid cooling of the youngest neutron star in the Galaxy; this provides the first direct evidence for superfluidity and superconductivity in the supra-nuclear core of neutron stars. We show that observations of thermonuclear X-ray bursts on neutron stars can be used to constrain properties of neutron superfluidity and neutrino emission. We describe the implications of rapid neutron star rotation rates on aspects of nuclear and superfluid physics. Finally, we show that entrainment coupling between the neutron superfluid and the nuclear lattice leads to a less mobile crust superfluid; this result puts into question the conventional picture of pulsar glitches as being solely due to the crust superfluid and suggests that the core superfluid also participates.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2013; v1 submitted 13 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
